What is the least resource intensive way to generate the luatex font cache for a new font?
When a font is first used with lualatex, luaotfload does some magic to produce font cache files.
For large fonts (e.g., Noto Sans CJK) this can take a lot of time and a lot of memory.
I have an old computer (5 year old MacBook air with 4GB RAM) running Linux with a 4GB swap partition. The initial cache generation of this font can take more than 15 min and render my computer unusable. Sometimes I just run out of memory and the process is killed.
Let's say I want to use the font as such:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
setmainfont[Script=CJK,Language=Chinese Simplified]{Noto Sans CJK SC}
begin{document}
中文
end{document}
What is the least resource intensive way and/or fastest way to generate the required cache files?
At the moment, I quit everything (even X11) and run lualatex from the console, but it still takes a long time, and quitting everything is a bit of a pain.
fonts luatex fontspec luaotfload
add a comment |
When a font is first used with lualatex, luaotfload does some magic to produce font cache files.
For large fonts (e.g., Noto Sans CJK) this can take a lot of time and a lot of memory.
I have an old computer (5 year old MacBook air with 4GB RAM) running Linux with a 4GB swap partition. The initial cache generation of this font can take more than 15 min and render my computer unusable. Sometimes I just run out of memory and the process is killed.
Let's say I want to use the font as such:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
setmainfont[Script=CJK,Language=Chinese Simplified]{Noto Sans CJK SC}
begin{document}
中文
end{document}
What is the least resource intensive way and/or fastest way to generate the required cache files?
At the moment, I quit everything (even X11) and run lualatex from the console, but it still takes a long time, and quitting everything is a bit of a pain.
fonts luatex fontspec luaotfload
1
That is a very good question, but I don't think you can do any better as you do now. Here is Hans' statement about this: mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/092703.html
– Henri Menke
47 mins ago
See also this answer tex.stackexchange.com/questions/453143/… and this comment tex.stackexchange.com/questions/453143/… of mine.
– Henri Menke
44 mins ago
add a comment |
When a font is first used with lualatex, luaotfload does some magic to produce font cache files.
For large fonts (e.g., Noto Sans CJK) this can take a lot of time and a lot of memory.
I have an old computer (5 year old MacBook air with 4GB RAM) running Linux with a 4GB swap partition. The initial cache generation of this font can take more than 15 min and render my computer unusable. Sometimes I just run out of memory and the process is killed.
Let's say I want to use the font as such:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
setmainfont[Script=CJK,Language=Chinese Simplified]{Noto Sans CJK SC}
begin{document}
中文
end{document}
What is the least resource intensive way and/or fastest way to generate the required cache files?
At the moment, I quit everything (even X11) and run lualatex from the console, but it still takes a long time, and quitting everything is a bit of a pain.
fonts luatex fontspec luaotfload
When a font is first used with lualatex, luaotfload does some magic to produce font cache files.
For large fonts (e.g., Noto Sans CJK) this can take a lot of time and a lot of memory.
I have an old computer (5 year old MacBook air with 4GB RAM) running Linux with a 4GB swap partition. The initial cache generation of this font can take more than 15 min and render my computer unusable. Sometimes I just run out of memory and the process is killed.
Let's say I want to use the font as such:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
setmainfont[Script=CJK,Language=Chinese Simplified]{Noto Sans CJK SC}
begin{document}
中文
end{document}
What is the least resource intensive way and/or fastest way to generate the required cache files?
At the moment, I quit everything (even X11) and run lualatex from the console, but it still takes a long time, and quitting everything is a bit of a pain.
fonts luatex fontspec luaotfload
fonts luatex fontspec luaotfload
asked 3 hours ago
David PurtonDavid Purton
10.7k2939
10.7k2939
1
That is a very good question, but I don't think you can do any better as you do now. Here is Hans' statement about this: mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/092703.html
– Henri Menke
47 mins ago
See also this answer tex.stackexchange.com/questions/453143/… and this comment tex.stackexchange.com/questions/453143/… of mine.
– Henri Menke
44 mins ago
add a comment |
1
That is a very good question, but I don't think you can do any better as you do now. Here is Hans' statement about this: mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/092703.html
– Henri Menke
47 mins ago
See also this answer tex.stackexchange.com/questions/453143/… and this comment tex.stackexchange.com/questions/453143/… of mine.
– Henri Menke
44 mins ago
1
1
That is a very good question, but I don't think you can do any better as you do now. Here is Hans' statement about this: mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/092703.html
– Henri Menke
47 mins ago
That is a very good question, but I don't think you can do any better as you do now. Here is Hans' statement about this: mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/092703.html
– Henri Menke
47 mins ago
See also this answer tex.stackexchange.com/questions/453143/… and this comment tex.stackexchange.com/questions/453143/… of mine.
– Henri Menke
44 mins ago
See also this answer tex.stackexchange.com/questions/453143/… and this comment tex.stackexchange.com/questions/453143/… of mine.
– Henri Menke
44 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can do as proposed in section 9.2.1 “Trimming fonts“ in Fonts out of ConTeXt and remove all the glyph names in the font.

Adapted to LaTeX and your example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec,luacode}
begin{luacode*}
fonts.handlers.otf.readers.registerextender {
name = "remove names from Noto Sans CJK SC",
action = function(fontdata)
if string.match(fontdata.metadata.fullname, "Noto Sans CJK SC") then
texio.write_nl("Trimming font " .. fontdata.metadata.fullname)
for k, v in next, fontdata.descriptions do
v.name = nil
end
end
end
}
end{luacode*}
setmainfont[Script=CJK,Language=Chinese Simplified]{Noto Sans CJK SC}
begin{document}
中文
end{document}
Can this solution be problematic in some cases?
– Paul Gaborit
16 mins ago
@PaulGaborit Yes, anything that wants to access glyphs by name won't work. In ConTeXt there isgetnamedglyphdirectwhich will break. I don't think there is anything like this in LaTeX. Also those name lookups are not very efficient.
– Henri Menke
9 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479744%2fwhat-is-the-least-resource-intensive-way-to-generate-the-luatex-font-cache-for-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can do as proposed in section 9.2.1 “Trimming fonts“ in Fonts out of ConTeXt and remove all the glyph names in the font.

Adapted to LaTeX and your example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec,luacode}
begin{luacode*}
fonts.handlers.otf.readers.registerextender {
name = "remove names from Noto Sans CJK SC",
action = function(fontdata)
if string.match(fontdata.metadata.fullname, "Noto Sans CJK SC") then
texio.write_nl("Trimming font " .. fontdata.metadata.fullname)
for k, v in next, fontdata.descriptions do
v.name = nil
end
end
end
}
end{luacode*}
setmainfont[Script=CJK,Language=Chinese Simplified]{Noto Sans CJK SC}
begin{document}
中文
end{document}
Can this solution be problematic in some cases?
– Paul Gaborit
16 mins ago
@PaulGaborit Yes, anything that wants to access glyphs by name won't work. In ConTeXt there isgetnamedglyphdirectwhich will break. I don't think there is anything like this in LaTeX. Also those name lookups are not very efficient.
– Henri Menke
9 mins ago
add a comment |
You can do as proposed in section 9.2.1 “Trimming fonts“ in Fonts out of ConTeXt and remove all the glyph names in the font.

Adapted to LaTeX and your example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec,luacode}
begin{luacode*}
fonts.handlers.otf.readers.registerextender {
name = "remove names from Noto Sans CJK SC",
action = function(fontdata)
if string.match(fontdata.metadata.fullname, "Noto Sans CJK SC") then
texio.write_nl("Trimming font " .. fontdata.metadata.fullname)
for k, v in next, fontdata.descriptions do
v.name = nil
end
end
end
}
end{luacode*}
setmainfont[Script=CJK,Language=Chinese Simplified]{Noto Sans CJK SC}
begin{document}
中文
end{document}
Can this solution be problematic in some cases?
– Paul Gaborit
16 mins ago
@PaulGaborit Yes, anything that wants to access glyphs by name won't work. In ConTeXt there isgetnamedglyphdirectwhich will break. I don't think there is anything like this in LaTeX. Also those name lookups are not very efficient.
– Henri Menke
9 mins ago
add a comment |
You can do as proposed in section 9.2.1 “Trimming fonts“ in Fonts out of ConTeXt and remove all the glyph names in the font.

Adapted to LaTeX and your example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec,luacode}
begin{luacode*}
fonts.handlers.otf.readers.registerextender {
name = "remove names from Noto Sans CJK SC",
action = function(fontdata)
if string.match(fontdata.metadata.fullname, "Noto Sans CJK SC") then
texio.write_nl("Trimming font " .. fontdata.metadata.fullname)
for k, v in next, fontdata.descriptions do
v.name = nil
end
end
end
}
end{luacode*}
setmainfont[Script=CJK,Language=Chinese Simplified]{Noto Sans CJK SC}
begin{document}
中文
end{document}
You can do as proposed in section 9.2.1 “Trimming fonts“ in Fonts out of ConTeXt and remove all the glyph names in the font.

Adapted to LaTeX and your example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec,luacode}
begin{luacode*}
fonts.handlers.otf.readers.registerextender {
name = "remove names from Noto Sans CJK SC",
action = function(fontdata)
if string.match(fontdata.metadata.fullname, "Noto Sans CJK SC") then
texio.write_nl("Trimming font " .. fontdata.metadata.fullname)
for k, v in next, fontdata.descriptions do
v.name = nil
end
end
end
}
end{luacode*}
setmainfont[Script=CJK,Language=Chinese Simplified]{Noto Sans CJK SC}
begin{document}
中文
end{document}
answered 29 mins ago
Henri MenkeHenri Menke
76.8k8168283
76.8k8168283
Can this solution be problematic in some cases?
– Paul Gaborit
16 mins ago
@PaulGaborit Yes, anything that wants to access glyphs by name won't work. In ConTeXt there isgetnamedglyphdirectwhich will break. I don't think there is anything like this in LaTeX. Also those name lookups are not very efficient.
– Henri Menke
9 mins ago
add a comment |
Can this solution be problematic in some cases?
– Paul Gaborit
16 mins ago
@PaulGaborit Yes, anything that wants to access glyphs by name won't work. In ConTeXt there isgetnamedglyphdirectwhich will break. I don't think there is anything like this in LaTeX. Also those name lookups are not very efficient.
– Henri Menke
9 mins ago
Can this solution be problematic in some cases?
– Paul Gaborit
16 mins ago
Can this solution be problematic in some cases?
– Paul Gaborit
16 mins ago
@PaulGaborit Yes, anything that wants to access glyphs by name won't work. In ConTeXt there is
getnamedglyphdirect which will break. I don't think there is anything like this in LaTeX. Also those name lookups are not very efficient.– Henri Menke
9 mins ago
@PaulGaborit Yes, anything that wants to access glyphs by name won't work. In ConTeXt there is
getnamedglyphdirect which will break. I don't think there is anything like this in LaTeX. Also those name lookups are not very efficient.– Henri Menke
9 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479744%2fwhat-is-the-least-resource-intensive-way-to-generate-the-luatex-font-cache-for-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
That is a very good question, but I don't think you can do any better as you do now. Here is Hans' statement about this: mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/092703.html
– Henri Menke
47 mins ago
See also this answer tex.stackexchange.com/questions/453143/… and this comment tex.stackexchange.com/questions/453143/… of mine.
– Henri Menke
44 mins ago