3D plot of Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) for suitable ranges of Lˆ and k
$begingroup$
Giving that Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) is as follow:

How can I Produce a 3D plot of AIC for suitable ranges of Lˆ and k.
In other words what could be a suitable ranges of L to try?
Moreover, what is the function of L^? I am struggling to find the equation to represent L^ so that I can plot it.
Thanks.
data-visualization model aic bic
New contributor
Jan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Giving that Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) is as follow:

How can I Produce a 3D plot of AIC for suitable ranges of Lˆ and k.
In other words what could be a suitable ranges of L to try?
Moreover, what is the function of L^? I am struggling to find the equation to represent L^ so that I can plot it.
Thanks.
data-visualization model aic bic
New contributor
Jan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Giving that Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) is as follow:

How can I Produce a 3D plot of AIC for suitable ranges of Lˆ and k.
In other words what could be a suitable ranges of L to try?
Moreover, what is the function of L^? I am struggling to find the equation to represent L^ so that I can plot it.
Thanks.
data-visualization model aic bic
New contributor
Jan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Giving that Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) is as follow:

How can I Produce a 3D plot of AIC for suitable ranges of Lˆ and k.
In other words what could be a suitable ranges of L to try?
Moreover, what is the function of L^? I am struggling to find the equation to represent L^ so that I can plot it.
Thanks.
data-visualization model aic bic
data-visualization model aic bic
New contributor
Jan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 5 hours ago
Jan
New contributor
Jan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
JanJan
1464
1464
New contributor
Jan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Jan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
According to wiki, for the specification you presented:
Let $k$ be the number of estimated parameters in the model. Let
$hat{L}$ be the maximum value of the function for the model.
While $k$ is always non-negative, the range and shape of the model likelihood function $hat{L}$ is different for each problem, since it depends on the densities and data you are working with.
For this reason, even though you can create the surface you want for different specifications of the same model, it's impossible to obtain an AIC surface that is representative for all types of models.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks Lucas, but I feel that I got confused with your answer. Can you please explain more?
$endgroup$
– Jan
40 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$hat{L}$ is the value of the assumed likelihood function evaluated at $hat{theta}$, i.e. at its maximum value for the observed data. If our likelihood function is $L(mathbf{X};theta)$ then $hat{L}=L(mathbf{X};hat{theta})$. $k$ is the number of model parameters being estimated.
For comparing 2 models, the one with lower AIC is preferred. Higher values of the log-likelihood imply lower values of the AIC, holding $k$ constant, while fewer model parameters also imply lower values of AIC, holding $hat{L}$ constant. The idea is to reward higher likelihood and penalize each time you add a parameter to the model, as you are losing degrees of freedom.
Assuming you are intending to construct a 3-D plot using triplets (AIC,$hat{L},k$) from various models you have estimated, I'm not sure the plot will give you much insight beyond simply looking at AIC. The problem with creating a surface (as mentioned in the answer from @Lucas Farias) is that $k$ alone does not tell us which regressors we are including. For example $y=a_0+a_1x+a_2z$ and $y=b_0+b_1w+b_2v$ both have $k=2$, but will yield different values of $hat{L}$ and AIC.
New contributor
dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks dlnB for the clarification. In simple words, what do you suggest values to use to plot this 3D plot.
$endgroup$
– Jan
38 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Jan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f397807%2f3d-plot-of-akaike-information-criterion-aic-for-suitable-ranges-of-l%25cb%2586-and-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
According to wiki, for the specification you presented:
Let $k$ be the number of estimated parameters in the model. Let
$hat{L}$ be the maximum value of the function for the model.
While $k$ is always non-negative, the range and shape of the model likelihood function $hat{L}$ is different for each problem, since it depends on the densities and data you are working with.
For this reason, even though you can create the surface you want for different specifications of the same model, it's impossible to obtain an AIC surface that is representative for all types of models.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks Lucas, but I feel that I got confused with your answer. Can you please explain more?
$endgroup$
– Jan
40 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
According to wiki, for the specification you presented:
Let $k$ be the number of estimated parameters in the model. Let
$hat{L}$ be the maximum value of the function for the model.
While $k$ is always non-negative, the range and shape of the model likelihood function $hat{L}$ is different for each problem, since it depends on the densities and data you are working with.
For this reason, even though you can create the surface you want for different specifications of the same model, it's impossible to obtain an AIC surface that is representative for all types of models.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks Lucas, but I feel that I got confused with your answer. Can you please explain more?
$endgroup$
– Jan
40 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
According to wiki, for the specification you presented:
Let $k$ be the number of estimated parameters in the model. Let
$hat{L}$ be the maximum value of the function for the model.
While $k$ is always non-negative, the range and shape of the model likelihood function $hat{L}$ is different for each problem, since it depends on the densities and data you are working with.
For this reason, even though you can create the surface you want for different specifications of the same model, it's impossible to obtain an AIC surface that is representative for all types of models.
$endgroup$
According to wiki, for the specification you presented:
Let $k$ be the number of estimated parameters in the model. Let
$hat{L}$ be the maximum value of the function for the model.
While $k$ is always non-negative, the range and shape of the model likelihood function $hat{L}$ is different for each problem, since it depends on the densities and data you are working with.
For this reason, even though you can create the surface you want for different specifications of the same model, it's impossible to obtain an AIC surface that is representative for all types of models.
answered 4 hours ago
Lucas FariasLucas Farias
8251522
8251522
$begingroup$
Thanks Lucas, but I feel that I got confused with your answer. Can you please explain more?
$endgroup$
– Jan
40 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks Lucas, but I feel that I got confused with your answer. Can you please explain more?
$endgroup$
– Jan
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks Lucas, but I feel that I got confused with your answer. Can you please explain more?
$endgroup$
– Jan
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks Lucas, but I feel that I got confused with your answer. Can you please explain more?
$endgroup$
– Jan
40 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$hat{L}$ is the value of the assumed likelihood function evaluated at $hat{theta}$, i.e. at its maximum value for the observed data. If our likelihood function is $L(mathbf{X};theta)$ then $hat{L}=L(mathbf{X};hat{theta})$. $k$ is the number of model parameters being estimated.
For comparing 2 models, the one with lower AIC is preferred. Higher values of the log-likelihood imply lower values of the AIC, holding $k$ constant, while fewer model parameters also imply lower values of AIC, holding $hat{L}$ constant. The idea is to reward higher likelihood and penalize each time you add a parameter to the model, as you are losing degrees of freedom.
Assuming you are intending to construct a 3-D plot using triplets (AIC,$hat{L},k$) from various models you have estimated, I'm not sure the plot will give you much insight beyond simply looking at AIC. The problem with creating a surface (as mentioned in the answer from @Lucas Farias) is that $k$ alone does not tell us which regressors we are including. For example $y=a_0+a_1x+a_2z$ and $y=b_0+b_1w+b_2v$ both have $k=2$, but will yield different values of $hat{L}$ and AIC.
New contributor
dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks dlnB for the clarification. In simple words, what do you suggest values to use to plot this 3D plot.
$endgroup$
– Jan
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$hat{L}$ is the value of the assumed likelihood function evaluated at $hat{theta}$, i.e. at its maximum value for the observed data. If our likelihood function is $L(mathbf{X};theta)$ then $hat{L}=L(mathbf{X};hat{theta})$. $k$ is the number of model parameters being estimated.
For comparing 2 models, the one with lower AIC is preferred. Higher values of the log-likelihood imply lower values of the AIC, holding $k$ constant, while fewer model parameters also imply lower values of AIC, holding $hat{L}$ constant. The idea is to reward higher likelihood and penalize each time you add a parameter to the model, as you are losing degrees of freedom.
Assuming you are intending to construct a 3-D plot using triplets (AIC,$hat{L},k$) from various models you have estimated, I'm not sure the plot will give you much insight beyond simply looking at AIC. The problem with creating a surface (as mentioned in the answer from @Lucas Farias) is that $k$ alone does not tell us which regressors we are including. For example $y=a_0+a_1x+a_2z$ and $y=b_0+b_1w+b_2v$ both have $k=2$, but will yield different values of $hat{L}$ and AIC.
New contributor
dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks dlnB for the clarification. In simple words, what do you suggest values to use to plot this 3D plot.
$endgroup$
– Jan
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$hat{L}$ is the value of the assumed likelihood function evaluated at $hat{theta}$, i.e. at its maximum value for the observed data. If our likelihood function is $L(mathbf{X};theta)$ then $hat{L}=L(mathbf{X};hat{theta})$. $k$ is the number of model parameters being estimated.
For comparing 2 models, the one with lower AIC is preferred. Higher values of the log-likelihood imply lower values of the AIC, holding $k$ constant, while fewer model parameters also imply lower values of AIC, holding $hat{L}$ constant. The idea is to reward higher likelihood and penalize each time you add a parameter to the model, as you are losing degrees of freedom.
Assuming you are intending to construct a 3-D plot using triplets (AIC,$hat{L},k$) from various models you have estimated, I'm not sure the plot will give you much insight beyond simply looking at AIC. The problem with creating a surface (as mentioned in the answer from @Lucas Farias) is that $k$ alone does not tell us which regressors we are including. For example $y=a_0+a_1x+a_2z$ and $y=b_0+b_1w+b_2v$ both have $k=2$, but will yield different values of $hat{L}$ and AIC.
New contributor
dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$hat{L}$ is the value of the assumed likelihood function evaluated at $hat{theta}$, i.e. at its maximum value for the observed data. If our likelihood function is $L(mathbf{X};theta)$ then $hat{L}=L(mathbf{X};hat{theta})$. $k$ is the number of model parameters being estimated.
For comparing 2 models, the one with lower AIC is preferred. Higher values of the log-likelihood imply lower values of the AIC, holding $k$ constant, while fewer model parameters also imply lower values of AIC, holding $hat{L}$ constant. The idea is to reward higher likelihood and penalize each time you add a parameter to the model, as you are losing degrees of freedom.
Assuming you are intending to construct a 3-D plot using triplets (AIC,$hat{L},k$) from various models you have estimated, I'm not sure the plot will give you much insight beyond simply looking at AIC. The problem with creating a surface (as mentioned in the answer from @Lucas Farias) is that $k$ alone does not tell us which regressors we are including. For example $y=a_0+a_1x+a_2z$ and $y=b_0+b_1w+b_2v$ both have $k=2$, but will yield different values of $hat{L}$ and AIC.
New contributor
dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 4 hours ago
New contributor
dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 4 hours ago
dlnBdlnB
6989
6989
New contributor
dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
Thanks dlnB for the clarification. In simple words, what do you suggest values to use to plot this 3D plot.
$endgroup$
– Jan
38 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks dlnB for the clarification. In simple words, what do you suggest values to use to plot this 3D plot.
$endgroup$
– Jan
38 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks dlnB for the clarification. In simple words, what do you suggest values to use to plot this 3D plot.
$endgroup$
– Jan
38 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thanks dlnB for the clarification. In simple words, what do you suggest values to use to plot this 3D plot.
$endgroup$
– Jan
38 mins ago
add a comment |
Jan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f397807%2f3d-plot-of-akaike-information-criterion-aic-for-suitable-ranges-of-l%25cb%2586-and-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown