Is there a defined priority for pattern matching?












3












$begingroup$


If you define a function g, like so:



g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"    

g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"


why will Mathematica always return g[2] == "Even", even though NumberQ[2] == True?



More specifically, is there a defined order in which Mathematica will try to match function cases? Does it evaluate the most specific match first?






pattern-matching expression-test







share|improve this question









New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    g[x_NumberQ] means to match arguments with the head NumberQ. What you want is to match arguments such that NumberQ[x] is True, which is g[x_?NumberQ]. Look up PatternTest. (Before you make this correction, make sure to run Clear[g] first.)
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    That's right---fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – wgoodall01
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Once you have made this fix, evaluate DownValues[g]; that should give a hint as to which case gets applied first. Generally, it tries to put special cases first before general ones.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Or just execute ?g to see the order of the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    20 mins ago
















3












$begingroup$


If you define a function g, like so:



g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"    

g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"


why will Mathematica always return g[2] == "Even", even though NumberQ[2] == True?



More specifically, is there a defined order in which Mathematica will try to match function cases? Does it evaluate the most specific match first?






pattern-matching expression-test







share|improve this question









New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    g[x_NumberQ] means to match arguments with the head NumberQ. What you want is to match arguments such that NumberQ[x] is True, which is g[x_?NumberQ]. Look up PatternTest. (Before you make this correction, make sure to run Clear[g] first.)
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    That's right---fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – wgoodall01
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Once you have made this fix, evaluate DownValues[g]; that should give a hint as to which case gets applied first. Generally, it tries to put special cases first before general ones.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Or just execute ?g to see the order of the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    20 mins ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


If you define a function g, like so:



g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"    

g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"


why will Mathematica always return g[2] == "Even", even though NumberQ[2] == True?



More specifically, is there a defined order in which Mathematica will try to match function cases? Does it evaluate the most specific match first?






pattern-matching expression-test







share|improve this question









New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




If you define a function g, like so:



g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"    

g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"


why will Mathematica always return g[2] == "Even", even though NumberQ[2] == True?



More specifically, is there a defined order in which Mathematica will try to match function cases? Does it evaluate the most specific match first?






pattern-matching expression-test




pattern-matching expression-test






share|improve this question









New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







wgoodall01













New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









wgoodall01wgoodall01

1185




1185




New contributor




wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






wgoodall01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    g[x_NumberQ] means to match arguments with the head NumberQ. What you want is to match arguments such that NumberQ[x] is True, which is g[x_?NumberQ]. Look up PatternTest. (Before you make this correction, make sure to run Clear[g] first.)
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    That's right---fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – wgoodall01
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Once you have made this fix, evaluate DownValues[g]; that should give a hint as to which case gets applied first. Generally, it tries to put special cases first before general ones.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Or just execute ?g to see the order of the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    20 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    g[x_NumberQ] means to match arguments with the head NumberQ. What you want is to match arguments such that NumberQ[x] is True, which is g[x_?NumberQ]. Look up PatternTest. (Before you make this correction, make sure to run Clear[g] first.)
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    That's right---fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – wgoodall01
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Once you have made this fix, evaluate DownValues[g]; that should give a hint as to which case gets applied first. Generally, it tries to put special cases first before general ones.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is computer-less♦
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Or just execute ?g to see the order of the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    20 mins ago
















$begingroup$
g[x_NumberQ] means to match arguments with the head NumberQ. What you want is to match arguments such that NumberQ[x] is True, which is g[x_?NumberQ]. Look up PatternTest. (Before you make this correction, make sure to run Clear[g] first.)
$endgroup$
– J. M. is computer-less♦
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
g[x_NumberQ] means to match arguments with the head NumberQ. What you want is to match arguments such that NumberQ[x] is True, which is g[x_?NumberQ]. Look up PatternTest. (Before you make this correction, make sure to run Clear[g] first.)
$endgroup$
– J. M. is computer-less♦
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
That's right---fixed.
$endgroup$
– wgoodall01
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
That's right---fixed.
$endgroup$
– wgoodall01
1 hour ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Once you have made this fix, evaluate DownValues[g]; that should give a hint as to which case gets applied first. Generally, it tries to put special cases first before general ones.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is computer-less♦
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
Once you have made this fix, evaluate DownValues[g]; that should give a hint as to which case gets applied first. Generally, it tries to put special cases first before general ones.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is computer-less♦
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
Or just execute ?g to see the order of the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Roman
20 mins ago




$begingroup$
Or just execute ?g to see the order of the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Roman
20 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

TheOrderingOfDefinitions




  • ... The Wolfram System follows the principle of trying to put more general definitions after more specific ones. This means that special cases of rules are typically tried before more general cases.

  • Although in many practical cases, the Wolfram System can recognize when one rule is more general than another, you should realize that this is not always possible. For example, if two rules both contain complicated /; conditions, it may not be possible to work out which is more general, and, in fact, there may not be a definite ordering. Whenever the appropriate ordering is not clear, the Wolfram System stores rules in the order you give them.




ClearAll[g]

g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"

g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"

g /@ {1, 2}



{"number", "even"}




ClearAll[h]

h[x_?NumberQ] := "number"

h[x_?EvenQ] := "even"

h /@ {1, 2}



{"number", "number"}







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    wgoodall01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192278%2fis-there-a-defined-priority-for-pattern-matching%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    TheOrderingOfDefinitions




    • ... The Wolfram System follows the principle of trying to put more general definitions after more specific ones. This means that special cases of rules are typically tried before more general cases.

    • Although in many practical cases, the Wolfram System can recognize when one rule is more general than another, you should realize that this is not always possible. For example, if two rules both contain complicated /; conditions, it may not be possible to work out which is more general, and, in fact, there may not be a definite ordering. Whenever the appropriate ordering is not clear, the Wolfram System stores rules in the order you give them.




    ClearAll[g]
    
g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
    
g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
    
g /@ {1, 2}



    {"number", "even"}




    ClearAll[h]
    
h[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
    
h[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
    
h /@ {1, 2}



    {"number", "number"}







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      TheOrderingOfDefinitions




      • ... The Wolfram System follows the principle of trying to put more general definitions after more specific ones. This means that special cases of rules are typically tried before more general cases.

      • Although in many practical cases, the Wolfram System can recognize when one rule is more general than another, you should realize that this is not always possible. For example, if two rules both contain complicated /; conditions, it may not be possible to work out which is more general, and, in fact, there may not be a definite ordering. Whenever the appropriate ordering is not clear, the Wolfram System stores rules in the order you give them.




      ClearAll[g]
      
g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
      
g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
      
g /@ {1, 2}



      {"number", "even"}




      ClearAll[h]
      
h[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
      
h[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
      
h /@ {1, 2}



      {"number", "number"}







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        TheOrderingOfDefinitions




        • ... The Wolfram System follows the principle of trying to put more general definitions after more specific ones. This means that special cases of rules are typically tried before more general cases.

        • Although in many practical cases, the Wolfram System can recognize when one rule is more general than another, you should realize that this is not always possible. For example, if two rules both contain complicated /; conditions, it may not be possible to work out which is more general, and, in fact, there may not be a definite ordering. Whenever the appropriate ordering is not clear, the Wolfram System stores rules in the order you give them.




        ClearAll[g]
        
g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
        
g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
        
g /@ {1, 2}



        {"number", "even"}




        ClearAll[h]
        
h[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
        
h[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
        
h /@ {1, 2}



        {"number", "number"}







        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        TheOrderingOfDefinitions




        • ... The Wolfram System follows the principle of trying to put more general definitions after more specific ones. This means that special cases of rules are typically tried before more general cases.

        • Although in many practical cases, the Wolfram System can recognize when one rule is more general than another, you should realize that this is not always possible. For example, if two rules both contain complicated /; conditions, it may not be possible to work out which is more general, and, in fact, there may not be a definite ordering. Whenever the appropriate ordering is not clear, the Wolfram System stores rules in the order you give them.




        ClearAll[g]
        
g[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
        
g[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
        
g /@ {1, 2}



        {"number", "even"}




        ClearAll[h]
        
h[x_?NumberQ] := "number"
        
h[x_?EvenQ] := "even"
        
h /@ {1, 2}



        {"number", "number"}








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        kglrkglr

        186k10202421




        186k10202421






















            wgoodall01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            wgoodall01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            wgoodall01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            wgoodall01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192278%2fis-there-a-defined-priority-for-pattern-matching%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Loup dans la culture

            Image
            Loups sur une enluminure du Bestiaire d'Aberdeen Le loup est l'animal le plus emblématique de l'histoire de l'Eurasie, il était à l'honneur durant l'Antiquité chez la totalité des anciens peuples européens [ 1 ] . Sommaire 1 Le loup dans la mythologie 2 Les loups dans le folklore 2.1 L'évolution des mentalités 2.2 Le loup dans la psychanalyse 3 Le loup dans les œuvres culturelles 3.1 Le loup dans la littérature 3.1.1 Fables 3.1.2 Poésie 3.1.3 Romans 3.1.4 Littérature jeunesse 3.1.4.1 Quelques titres d'albums contemporains 3.1.5 Bande dessinée 3.2 Le loup à l'écran 3.2.1 Le cinéma et la télévision 3.2.2 Documentaires 3.2.3 Dessins animés 3.2.4 Jeux vidéo 3.3 Le loup en peinture et en sculpture 3.4 Le loup dans les œuvres musicales 4 Le loup et les noms propres 5 Bibliographie 6 Notes et références 7 Voir aussi 7.1 Articles connexes
            Read more

            How to solve the problem of ntp “Unable to contact time server” from KDE?

            Image
            1 0 I want to set date and time automatically but this error appears when I try to .. I'm using openSUSE, I tried different servers but it didn't work either, help please! It doesn't seem to be a network problem: $ ping pool.ntp.org 64 bytes from 41.78.128.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=41 time=260 ms To the question of whether ntpd is installed and running: $ ps -C ntpd PID TTY TIME CMD i.e. there's no ntpd process running. $ rpm -qa | grep ntp yast2-ntp-client-3.1.12-1.7.noarch ntp-4.2.6p5-25.2.1.i586 Further information from the comments: $ sudo ntpdate pool.ntp.org 25 Sep 19:41:51 ntpdate[3162]: no server suitable for synchronization found networking kde opensuse ntp ntpd sh
            Read more

            ASUS Zenbook UX433/UX333 — Configure Touchpad-embedded numpad on Linux

            Image
            0 1 I have an ASUS Zenbook UX433,on which ASUS decided to innovate by embedding a Numpad inside the touchpad (see picture 1). Toggling between classic touchpad mode and numpad (also turns the touchpad LEDs on) can be done through the golden button in the top-right corner of the touchpad. However, on my Manjaro arch Linux config, this behavior does not work by default and I can only use the touchpad, no numpad. Has anyone been able to configure the numpad to work on Linux, or have any idea how this could be achieved? EDIT1: I have had a look at the official Windows drivers for the UX433FA TouchPad, but was not able to make anything of it. I tried installing them on Linux using tools like NDISWrapper, but they do not detect the TouchPad/Numpad hardware, and my understanding of drivers is too limited.
            Read more