Using NF with FPAT – what am I doing wrong?
I'm trying to figure out, and to learn AWK, why, when NF is used with FPAT regex, the comma is considered a field. I prefer using NF and FPAT:
1) NF – to limit the output to the actual number of fields for the record
2) FPAT – to handle an embedded comma in a quoted field like line 3:
"Bus Driver, City/Transit",51
3) the awk script is used for several input files that have a different number of columns for record 6 - record 6 is the column name/header for the contents of the file...
The output from testing, the first, test1, uses a fixed value for number of fields, the second, test2, uses NF for the number of fields.
I've been using this script to experiment with some ideas/concepts - I'm not well versed with AWK so I'm trying to learn...
thank you - any help is much appreciated
using gawk 4.1.4
BEGIN {
FPAT = "(^,)|([^,]+)|("[^"]+")"
OFS = "t"
}
NR == 6 {
for (i = 1; 6 >= i; ++i) {
#for (i = 1; NF >= i; ++i) {
colName[i] = $i
print "Column Name: " colName[i]
}
{ print "", "number of fields: " NF }
}
Input File starting at record 6: NR == 6 {...
Occupation,States Licensed
Barber,51
"Bus Driver, City/Transit",51
The output I expect/want:
Column Name: Occupation
Column Name: States Licensed
number of fields: 2
test 1: for (i = 1; 6 >= i; ++i) {...
output is correct - what I expect/want, except, of course, for the 4 columns/fields that are not valid but are shown because of using a fixed value of 6.
Column Name: Occupation
Column Name: States Licensed
Column Name:
Column Name:
Column Name:
Column Name:
number of fields: 2
test 2: for (i = 1; NF >= i; ++i) {...
output is NOT what I expect/want; note the comma is a indicate as a field
Column Name: Occupation
Column Name: ,
Column Name: States Licensed
number of fields: 3
text-processing awk csv gawk
edited 19 mins ago
G-Man
13.2k93566
asked 51 mins ago
TomMTomM
62
New contributor
TomM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'm trying to figure out, and to learn AWK, why, when NF is used with FPAT regex, the comma is considered a field. I prefer using NF and FPAT:
1) NF – to limit the output to the actual number of fields for the record
2) FPAT – to handle an embedded comma in a quoted field like line 3:
"Bus Driver, City/Transit",51
3) the awk script is used for several input files that have a different number of columns for record 6 - record 6 is the column name/header for the contents of the file...
The output from testing, the first, test1, uses a fixed value for number of fields, the second, test2, uses NF for the number of fields.
I've been using this script to experiment with some ideas/concepts - I'm not well versed with AWK so I'm trying to learn...
thank you - any help is much appreciated
using gawk 4.1.4
BEGIN {
FPAT = "(^,)|([^,]+)|("[^"]+")"
OFS = "t"
}
NR == 6 {
for (i = 1; 6 >= i; ++i) {
#for (i = 1; NF >= i; ++i) {
colName[i] = $i
print "Column Name: " colName[i]
}
{ print "", "number of fields: " NF }
}
Input File starting at record 6: NR == 6 {...
Occupation,States Licensed
Barber,51
"Bus Driver, City/Transit",51
The output I expect/want:
Column Name: Occupation
Column Name: States Licensed
number of fields: 2
test 1: for (i = 1; 6 >= i; ++i) {...
output is correct - what I expect/want, except, of course, for the 4 columns/fields that are not valid but are shown because of using a fixed value of 6.
Column Name: Occupation
Column Name: States Licensed
Column Name:
Column Name:
Column Name:
Column Name:
number of fields: 2
test 2: for (i = 1; NF >= i; ++i) {...
output is NOT what I expect/want; note the comma is a indicate as a field
Column Name: Occupation
Column Name: ,
Column Name: States Licensed
number of fields: 3
text-processing awk csv gawk
edited 19 mins ago
G-Man
13.2k93566
asked 51 mins ago
TomMTomM
62
New contributor
TomM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'm trying to figure out, and to learn AWK, why, when NF is used with FPAT regex, the comma is considered a field. I prefer using NF and FPAT:
1) NF – to limit the output to the actual number of fields for the record
2) FPAT – to handle an embedded comma in a quoted field like line 3:
"Bus Driver, City/Transit",51
3) the awk script is used for several input files that have a different number of columns for record 6 - record 6 is the column name/header for the contents of the file...
The output from testing, the first, test1, uses a fixed value for number of fields, the second, test2, uses NF for the number of fields.
I've been using this script to experiment with some ideas/concepts - I'm not well versed with AWK so I'm trying to learn...
thank you - any help is much appreciated
using gawk 4.1.4
BEGIN {
FPAT = "(^,)|([^,]+)|("[^"]+")"
OFS = "t"
}
NR == 6 {
for (i = 1; 6 >= i; ++i) {
#for (i = 1; NF >= i; ++i) {
colName[i] = $i
print "Column Name: " colName[i]
}
{ print "", "number of fields: " NF }
}
Input File starting at record 6: NR == 6 {...
Occupation,States Licensed
Barber,51
"Bus Driver, City/Transit",51
The output I expect/want:
Column Name: Occupation
Column Name: States Licensed
number of fields: 2
test 1: for (i = 1; 6 >= i; ++i) {...
output is correct - what I expect/want, except, of course, for the 4 columns/fields that are not valid but are shown because of using a fixed value of 6.
Column Name: Occupation
Column Name: States Licensed
Column Name:
Column Name:
Column Name:
Column Name:
number of fields: 2
test 2: for (i = 1; NF >= i; ++i) {...
output is NOT what I expect/want; note the comma is a indicate as a field
Column Name: Occupation
Column Name: ,
Column Name: States Licensed
number of fields: 3
text-processing awk csv gawk
edited 19 mins ago
G-Man
13.2k93566
asked 51 mins ago
TomMTomM
62
New contributor
TomM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm trying to figure out, and to learn AWK, why, when NF is used with FPAT regex, the comma is considered a field. I prefer using NF and FPAT:
1) NF – to limit the output to the actual number of fields for the record
2) FPAT – to handle an embedded comma in a quoted field like line 3:
"Bus Driver, City/Transit",51
3) the awk script is used for several input files that have a different number of columns for record 6 - record 6 is the column name/header for the contents of the file...
The output from testing, the first, test1, uses a fixed value for number of fields, the second, test2, uses NF for the number of fields.
I've been using this script to experiment with some ideas/concepts - I'm not well versed with AWK so I'm trying to learn...
thank you - any help is much appreciated
using gawk 4.1.4
BEGIN {
FPAT = "(^,)|([^,]+)|("[^"]+")"
OFS = "t"
}
NR == 6 {
for (i = 1; 6 >= i; ++i) {
#for (i = 1; NF >= i; ++i) {
colName[i] = $i
print "Column Name: " colName[i]
}
{ print "", "number of fields: " NF }
}
Input File starting at record 6: NR == 6 {...
Occupation,States Licensed
Barber,51
"Bus Driver, City/Transit",51
The output I expect/want:
Column Name: Occupation
Column Name: States Licensed
number of fields: 2
test 1: for (i = 1; 6 >= i; ++i) {...
output is correct - what I expect/want, except, of course, for the 4 columns/fields that are not valid but are shown because of using a fixed value of 6.
Column Name: Occupation
Column Name: States Licensed
Column Name:
Column Name:
Column Name:
Column Name:
number of fields: 2
test 2: for (i = 1; NF >= i; ++i) {...
output is NOT what I expect/want; note the comma is a indicate as a field
Column Name: Occupation
Column Name: ,
Column Name: States Licensed
number of fields: 3
text-processing awk csv gawk
text-processing awk csv gawk
edited 19 mins ago
G-Man
13.2k93566
asked 51 mins ago
TomMTomM
62
New contributor
TomM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 19 mins ago
G-Man
13.2k93566
asked 51 mins ago
TomMTomM
62
New contributor
TomM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 19 mins ago
G-Man
13.2k93566
edited 19 mins ago
G-Man
13.2k93566
edited 19 mins ago
G-Man
13.2k93566
13.2k93566
asked 51 mins ago
TomMTomM
62
New contributor
TomM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 51 mins ago
TomMTomM
62
asked 51 mins ago
TomMTomM
62
62
New contributor
TomM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
TomM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
TomM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
TomM is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f503891%2fusing-nf-with-fpat-what-am-i-doing-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
TomM is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
TomM is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
TomM is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
TomM is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f503891%2fusing-nf-with-fpat-what-am-i-doing-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
