Suppose $U_1,dots,U_k$ and $V_1,dots,V_k$ are $ntimes n$ unitary matrices. Show that $|U_1cdots U_k-V_1cdots...












4












$begingroup$


Let $V,W$ be complex inner product spaces. Suppose $T: V to W$ is a linear map, then we define
$$|T|:=sup{|Tv|_{W}:|v|_{V}=1}$$ where $|v_{V}|:=sqrt{langle v,vrangle}$ and $|Tv|_{W}:=sqrt{langle Tv,Tvrangle}$.



Question: Suppose $U_1,ldots,U_k$ and $V_1,ldots,V_k$ are $n {times} n$ unitary matrices. Show that
$$|U_1cdots U_k-V_1cdots V_k| leq sum_{i=1}^{k}|U_i-V_i|$$



I have tried to use triangle inequality for norms and induction but failed. Can anyone give some hints? Thank you!






linear-algebra matrices functional-analysis norm







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    Let $V,W$ be complex inner product spaces. Suppose $T: V to W$ is a linear map, then we define
    $$|T|:=sup{|Tv|_{W}:|v|_{V}=1}$$ where $|v_{V}|:=sqrt{langle v,vrangle}$ and $|Tv|_{W}:=sqrt{langle Tv,Tvrangle}$.



    Question: Suppose $U_1,ldots,U_k$ and $V_1,ldots,V_k$ are $n {times} n$ unitary matrices. Show that
    $$|U_1cdots U_k-V_1cdots V_k| leq sum_{i=1}^{k}|U_i-V_i|$$



    I have tried to use triangle inequality for norms and induction but failed. Can anyone give some hints? Thank you!






    linear-algebra matrices functional-analysis norm







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let $V,W$ be complex inner product spaces. Suppose $T: V to W$ is a linear map, then we define
      $$|T|:=sup{|Tv|_{W}:|v|_{V}=1}$$ where $|v_{V}|:=sqrt{langle v,vrangle}$ and $|Tv|_{W}:=sqrt{langle Tv,Tvrangle}$.



      Question: Suppose $U_1,ldots,U_k$ and $V_1,ldots,V_k$ are $n {times} n$ unitary matrices. Show that
      $$|U_1cdots U_k-V_1cdots V_k| leq sum_{i=1}^{k}|U_i-V_i|$$



      I have tried to use triangle inequality for norms and induction but failed. Can anyone give some hints? Thank you!






      linear-algebra matrices functional-analysis norm







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $V,W$ be complex inner product spaces. Suppose $T: V to W$ is a linear map, then we define
      $$|T|:=sup{|Tv|_{W}:|v|_{V}=1}$$ where $|v_{V}|:=sqrt{langle v,vrangle}$ and $|Tv|_{W}:=sqrt{langle Tv,Tvrangle}$.



      Question: Suppose $U_1,ldots,U_k$ and $V_1,ldots,V_k$ are $n {times} n$ unitary matrices. Show that
      $$|U_1cdots U_k-V_1cdots V_k| leq sum_{i=1}^{k}|U_i-V_i|$$



      I have tried to use triangle inequality for norms and induction but failed. Can anyone give some hints? Thank you!






      linear-algebra matrices functional-analysis norm




      linear-algebra matrices functional-analysis norm






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      Asaf Karagila♦

      306k33438769




      306k33438769










      asked 4 hours ago









      bbwbbw

      52239




      52239






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7












          $begingroup$

          For $k = 1$, the inequality becomes an identity. So, start with the special case $k = 2$:
          $$
          begin{array}{ll}
          & ||U_1 U_2 - V_1 V_2||\ \
          = & ||U_1 U_2 - V_1 U_2 + V_1 U_2 - V_1 V_2||\ \
          = &
          || ( U_1 - V_1) U_2 + V_1 (U_2 - V_2) || \ \
          leq & ||( U_1 - V_1) U_2 || + ||V_1 (U_2 - V_2) ||.\
          end{array}
          $$
          (The last inequality is the triangle inequality.) Now, since $U_2$ is unitary, we have $||U_{2}|| = 1$, so
          $$
          || ( U_1 - V_1) U_2 || leq || U_1 - V_1 ||.
          $$
          A similar bound obtains for $||V_1 (U_2 - V_2) ||$.



          This should give you enough "building blocks".:)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much!
            $endgroup$
            – bbw
            4 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You are welcome. I edited to remove the (unjustified) assumption that the matrices commute.:)
            $endgroup$
            – avs
            3 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3149889%2fsuppose-u-1-dots-u-k-and-v-1-dots-v-k-are-n-times-n-unitary-matrices-sh%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7












          $begingroup$

          For $k = 1$, the inequality becomes an identity. So, start with the special case $k = 2$:
          $$
          begin{array}{ll}
          & ||U_1 U_2 - V_1 V_2||\ \
          = & ||U_1 U_2 - V_1 U_2 + V_1 U_2 - V_1 V_2||\ \
          = &
          || ( U_1 - V_1) U_2 + V_1 (U_2 - V_2) || \ \
          leq & ||( U_1 - V_1) U_2 || + ||V_1 (U_2 - V_2) ||.\
          end{array}
          $$
          (The last inequality is the triangle inequality.) Now, since $U_2$ is unitary, we have $||U_{2}|| = 1$, so
          $$
          || ( U_1 - V_1) U_2 || leq || U_1 - V_1 ||.
          $$
          A similar bound obtains for $||V_1 (U_2 - V_2) ||$.



          This should give you enough "building blocks".:)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much!
            $endgroup$
            – bbw
            4 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You are welcome. I edited to remove the (unjustified) assumption that the matrices commute.:)
            $endgroup$
            – avs
            3 hours ago
















          7












          $begingroup$

          For $k = 1$, the inequality becomes an identity. So, start with the special case $k = 2$:
          $$
          begin{array}{ll}
          & ||U_1 U_2 - V_1 V_2||\ \
          = & ||U_1 U_2 - V_1 U_2 + V_1 U_2 - V_1 V_2||\ \
          = &
          || ( U_1 - V_1) U_2 + V_1 (U_2 - V_2) || \ \
          leq & ||( U_1 - V_1) U_2 || + ||V_1 (U_2 - V_2) ||.\
          end{array}
          $$
          (The last inequality is the triangle inequality.) Now, since $U_2$ is unitary, we have $||U_{2}|| = 1$, so
          $$
          || ( U_1 - V_1) U_2 || leq || U_1 - V_1 ||.
          $$
          A similar bound obtains for $||V_1 (U_2 - V_2) ||$.



          This should give you enough "building blocks".:)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much!
            $endgroup$
            – bbw
            4 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You are welcome. I edited to remove the (unjustified) assumption that the matrices commute.:)
            $endgroup$
            – avs
            3 hours ago














          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          For $k = 1$, the inequality becomes an identity. So, start with the special case $k = 2$:
          $$
          begin{array}{ll}
          & ||U_1 U_2 - V_1 V_2||\ \
          = & ||U_1 U_2 - V_1 U_2 + V_1 U_2 - V_1 V_2||\ \
          = &
          || ( U_1 - V_1) U_2 + V_1 (U_2 - V_2) || \ \
          leq & ||( U_1 - V_1) U_2 || + ||V_1 (U_2 - V_2) ||.\
          end{array}
          $$
          (The last inequality is the triangle inequality.) Now, since $U_2$ is unitary, we have $||U_{2}|| = 1$, so
          $$
          || ( U_1 - V_1) U_2 || leq || U_1 - V_1 ||.
          $$
          A similar bound obtains for $||V_1 (U_2 - V_2) ||$.



          This should give you enough "building blocks".:)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          For $k = 1$, the inequality becomes an identity. So, start with the special case $k = 2$:
          $$
          begin{array}{ll}
          & ||U_1 U_2 - V_1 V_2||\ \
          = & ||U_1 U_2 - V_1 U_2 + V_1 U_2 - V_1 V_2||\ \
          = &
          || ( U_1 - V_1) U_2 + V_1 (U_2 - V_2) || \ \
          leq & ||( U_1 - V_1) U_2 || + ||V_1 (U_2 - V_2) ||.\
          end{array}
          $$
          (The last inequality is the triangle inequality.) Now, since $U_2$ is unitary, we have $||U_{2}|| = 1$, so
          $$
          || ( U_1 - V_1) U_2 || leq || U_1 - V_1 ||.
          $$
          A similar bound obtains for $||V_1 (U_2 - V_2) ||$.



          This should give you enough "building blocks".:)







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 3 hours ago

























          answered 4 hours ago









          avsavs

          3,434513




          3,434513












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much!
            $endgroup$
            – bbw
            4 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You are welcome. I edited to remove the (unjustified) assumption that the matrices commute.:)
            $endgroup$
            – avs
            3 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you so much!
            $endgroup$
            – bbw
            4 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You are welcome. I edited to remove the (unjustified) assumption that the matrices commute.:)
            $endgroup$
            – avs
            3 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you so much!
          $endgroup$
          – bbw
          4 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Thank you so much!
          $endgroup$
          – bbw
          4 hours ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          You are welcome. I edited to remove the (unjustified) assumption that the matrices commute.:)
          $endgroup$
          – avs
          3 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          You are welcome. I edited to remove the (unjustified) assumption that the matrices commute.:)
          $endgroup$
          – avs
          3 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3149889%2fsuppose-u-1-dots-u-k-and-v-1-dots-v-k-are-n-times-n-unitary-matrices-sh%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Loup dans la culture

          Image
          Loups sur une enluminure du Bestiaire d'Aberdeen Le loup est l'animal le plus emblématique de l'histoire de l'Eurasie, il était à l'honneur durant l'Antiquité chez la totalité des anciens peuples européens [ 1 ] . Sommaire 1 Le loup dans la mythologie 2 Les loups dans le folklore 2.1 L'évolution des mentalités 2.2 Le loup dans la psychanalyse 3 Le loup dans les œuvres culturelles 3.1 Le loup dans la littérature 3.1.1 Fables 3.1.2 Poésie 3.1.3 Romans 3.1.4 Littérature jeunesse 3.1.4.1 Quelques titres d'albums contemporains 3.1.5 Bande dessinée 3.2 Le loup à l'écran 3.2.1 Le cinéma et la télévision 3.2.2 Documentaires 3.2.3 Dessins animés 3.2.4 Jeux vidéo 3.3 Le loup en peinture et en sculpture 3.4 Le loup dans les œuvres musicales 4 Le loup et les noms propres 5 Bibliographie 6 Notes et références 7 Voir aussi 7.1 Articles connexes
          Read more

          How to solve the problem of ntp “Unable to contact time server” from KDE?

          Image
          1 0 I want to set date and time automatically but this error appears when I try to .. I'm using openSUSE, I tried different servers but it didn't work either, help please! It doesn't seem to be a network problem: $ ping pool.ntp.org 64 bytes from 41.78.128.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=41 time=260 ms To the question of whether ntpd is installed and running: $ ps -C ntpd PID TTY TIME CMD i.e. there's no ntpd process running. $ rpm -qa | grep ntp yast2-ntp-client-3.1.12-1.7.noarch ntp-4.2.6p5-25.2.1.i586 Further information from the comments: $ sudo ntpdate pool.ntp.org 25 Sep 19:41:51 ntpdate[3162]: no server suitable for synchronization found networking kde opensuse ntp ntpd sh
          Read more

          ASUS Zenbook UX433/UX333 — Configure Touchpad-embedded numpad on Linux

          Image
          0 1 I have an ASUS Zenbook UX433,on which ASUS decided to innovate by embedding a Numpad inside the touchpad (see picture 1). Toggling between classic touchpad mode and numpad (also turns the touchpad LEDs on) can be done through the golden button in the top-right corner of the touchpad. However, on my Manjaro arch Linux config, this behavior does not work by default and I can only use the touchpad, no numpad. Has anyone been able to configure the numpad to work on Linux, or have any idea how this could be achieved? EDIT1: I have had a look at the official Windows drivers for the UX433FA TouchPad, but was not able to make anything of it. I tried installing them on Linux using tools like NDISWrapper, but they do not detect the TouchPad/Numpad hardware, and my understanding of drivers is too limited.
          Read more