Is there a condensed side-by-side diff format?
I have two log files with thousands of lines. After pre-processing, only some lines differ. These remaining lines are either real differences, or shuffled groups of lines.
Unified diffs allow me to see the detailed differences, but it makes manual comparison with eyeballs hard. Side-by-side diffs seems more useful for comparison, but it also adds thousands of unchanged lines. Is there a way to get the advantage of both worlds?
Note, these log files are generated by xscope
which is a program that monitors Xorg protocol data. I am looking for general-purpose tools that can be applied to situations similar to the above, not specialized webserver access log analysis tools for example.
Two example log files are available at http://lekensteyn.nl/files/qemu-sdl-debug/ (log13
and log14
). A pre-processor command can be found in the xscope-filter
file which removes timestamps and other minor details.
diff
|
show 1 more comment
I have two log files with thousands of lines. After pre-processing, only some lines differ. These remaining lines are either real differences, or shuffled groups of lines.
Unified diffs allow me to see the detailed differences, but it makes manual comparison with eyeballs hard. Side-by-side diffs seems more useful for comparison, but it also adds thousands of unchanged lines. Is there a way to get the advantage of both worlds?
Note, these log files are generated by xscope
which is a program that monitors Xorg protocol data. I am looking for general-purpose tools that can be applied to situations similar to the above, not specialized webserver access log analysis tools for example.
Two example log files are available at http://lekensteyn.nl/files/qemu-sdl-debug/ (log13
and log14
). A pre-processor command can be found in the xscope-filter
file which removes timestamps and other minor details.
diff
1
Does yourdiff
have--suppress-common-lines
option? pastebin.com/KZrVCNFR
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 10:46
1
@manatwork Nice, it does. Any way to add more context (e.g. line numbers)?
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 10:50
5
Then maybevimdiff
(from the vim package) would serve your needs better: parallel display, colorized, common lines folded. Line numbers can be turned on with:set number
.
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 11:07
I think you should put vimdiff up as an answer :)
– Kotte
Jun 12 '13 at 14:03
1
CLI tools are preferred, but GUI tools are also allowed if they are tiny enough. I have tried kdiff3, but it still produced to much detail. Ideally, I don't see all unnecessary detail. I'll attach two data sets.
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:30
|
show 1 more comment
I have two log files with thousands of lines. After pre-processing, only some lines differ. These remaining lines are either real differences, or shuffled groups of lines.
Unified diffs allow me to see the detailed differences, but it makes manual comparison with eyeballs hard. Side-by-side diffs seems more useful for comparison, but it also adds thousands of unchanged lines. Is there a way to get the advantage of both worlds?
Note, these log files are generated by xscope
which is a program that monitors Xorg protocol data. I am looking for general-purpose tools that can be applied to situations similar to the above, not specialized webserver access log analysis tools for example.
Two example log files are available at http://lekensteyn.nl/files/qemu-sdl-debug/ (log13
and log14
). A pre-processor command can be found in the xscope-filter
file which removes timestamps and other minor details.
diff
I have two log files with thousands of lines. After pre-processing, only some lines differ. These remaining lines are either real differences, or shuffled groups of lines.
Unified diffs allow me to see the detailed differences, but it makes manual comparison with eyeballs hard. Side-by-side diffs seems more useful for comparison, but it also adds thousands of unchanged lines. Is there a way to get the advantage of both worlds?
Note, these log files are generated by xscope
which is a program that monitors Xorg protocol data. I am looking for general-purpose tools that can be applied to situations similar to the above, not specialized webserver access log analysis tools for example.
Two example log files are available at http://lekensteyn.nl/files/qemu-sdl-debug/ (log13
and log14
). A pre-processor command can be found in the xscope-filter
file which removes timestamps and other minor details.
diff
diff
edited Mar 17 '16 at 20:21
Randall
24919
24919
asked Jun 12 '13 at 10:40
LekensteynLekensteyn
9,963115288
9,963115288
1
Does yourdiff
have--suppress-common-lines
option? pastebin.com/KZrVCNFR
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 10:46
1
@manatwork Nice, it does. Any way to add more context (e.g. line numbers)?
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 10:50
5
Then maybevimdiff
(from the vim package) would serve your needs better: parallel display, colorized, common lines folded. Line numbers can be turned on with:set number
.
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 11:07
I think you should put vimdiff up as an answer :)
– Kotte
Jun 12 '13 at 14:03
1
CLI tools are preferred, but GUI tools are also allowed if they are tiny enough. I have tried kdiff3, but it still produced to much detail. Ideally, I don't see all unnecessary detail. I'll attach two data sets.
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:30
|
show 1 more comment
1
Does yourdiff
have--suppress-common-lines
option? pastebin.com/KZrVCNFR
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 10:46
1
@manatwork Nice, it does. Any way to add more context (e.g. line numbers)?
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 10:50
5
Then maybevimdiff
(from the vim package) would serve your needs better: parallel display, colorized, common lines folded. Line numbers can be turned on with:set number
.
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 11:07
I think you should put vimdiff up as an answer :)
– Kotte
Jun 12 '13 at 14:03
1
CLI tools are preferred, but GUI tools are also allowed if they are tiny enough. I have tried kdiff3, but it still produced to much detail. Ideally, I don't see all unnecessary detail. I'll attach two data sets.
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:30
1
1
Does your
diff
have --suppress-common-lines
option? pastebin.com/KZrVCNFR– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 10:46
Does your
diff
have --suppress-common-lines
option? pastebin.com/KZrVCNFR– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 10:46
1
1
@manatwork Nice, it does. Any way to add more context (e.g. line numbers)?
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 10:50
@manatwork Nice, it does. Any way to add more context (e.g. line numbers)?
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 10:50
5
5
Then maybe
vimdiff
(from the vim package) would serve your needs better: parallel display, colorized, common lines folded. Line numbers can be turned on with :set number
.– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 11:07
Then maybe
vimdiff
(from the vim package) would serve your needs better: parallel display, colorized, common lines folded. Line numbers can be turned on with :set number
.– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 11:07
I think you should put vimdiff up as an answer :)
– Kotte
Jun 12 '13 at 14:03
I think you should put vimdiff up as an answer :)
– Kotte
Jun 12 '13 at 14:03
1
1
CLI tools are preferred, but GUI tools are also allowed if they are tiny enough. I have tried kdiff3, but it still produced to much detail. Ideally, I don't see all unnecessary detail. I'll attach two data sets.
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:30
CLI tools are preferred, but GUI tools are also allowed if they are tiny enough. I have tried kdiff3, but it still produced to much detail. Ideally, I don't see all unnecessary detail. I'll attach two data sets.
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:30
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
The 2 diff tools I use the most would be meld and sdiff.
meld
Meld is a GUI but does a great job in showing diffs between files. It's geared more for software development with features such as the ability to move changes from one side to the other to merge changes but can be used as just a straight side-by-side diffing tool.
sdiff
I've used this tool for years. I generally run it with the following switches:
$ sdiff -bBWs file1 file2
-b
Ignore changes in the amount of white space.
-W
Ignore all white space.
-B
Ignore changes whose lines are all blank.
-s
Do not output common lines.
Often with log files you'll need to make the width of the columns wider, you can use -w <num>
to make the screen wider.
other tools that I use off and on
diffc
Diffc is a python script which colorizes unified diff output.
$ diffc [OPTION] FILE1 FILE2
vimdiff
Vimdiff is probably as good if not better than meld and it can be run from a terminal. I always forget to use it though which, to me, is a good indicator that I find the tool just a little to tough to use day to day. But YMMV.
1
One great feature of Meld, unfortunately not visible on your screenshot, is syntax highlighting of source code files.
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 14:35
Yes. I used to use vimdiff all the time, I've since moved to using meld, I find it easier to use and it's just easier to see what it's telling me vs. vimdiff.
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:42
@manatwork - added your link to the answer, thanks for the feedback!
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:51
1
Looks great for source code, but not so much for comparing log files. I often usecolordiff
from colordiff.org for source file. To my understanding,sdiff
is similar todiff -y
with no differences in output but slightly different options. +1 for showing some good alternatives to plain diff.
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:45
I've not ever used colordiff, I'll have to check it out. You're correct on thediff -y
. The addition of that switch todiff
seems to have happened at some point, or I never noticed it. Additionally here's a link to the gnu diff tools resource page. Good stuff for using this suite of tools.
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 16:15
add a comment |
Currently I am using side-by-side diff with grep filtering the different lines:
diff -y -W250 log.txt log2.txt | expand |
grep -E -C3 '^.{123} [|<>]( |$)' | colordiff | less -rS
- Option
-W250
makes the output wider such that I can see more data.
expand
is necessary to convert tabs to spaces
-C3
adds 3 lines of context to the grep output.
^.{123}
matches half of the data before the side-by-side diff markers.
colordiff
makes the output prettier to follow
less -rS
allows ANSI colors to be interpreted (-r
) and prevents wrapped lines (-S
).
This is a hack, alternatives are welcome.
1
This is wonderful.
– Pat Myron
Mar 17 '17 at 3:52
Nice idea. Unfortunately thegrep
regex is too slow. Alsodiff
has a-t
option to expand tabs.
– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:48
add a comment |
Nobody mentioned icdiff yet? It's great! Pic speaks for itself:
This is a very neat tool, also available on aur.
– Uzumaki D. Ichigo
Feb 16 '18 at 10:09
Too slow for large files though.
– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:30
add a comment |
The linux "sdiff" command shows side-by-side differences, by default including all lines, but you can use various options to show only differences:
sdiff -tWBs -w $COLUMNS config.xml config.xml.original
where
-t: translate tabs to spaces
-W: ignore whitespace differences
-B: ignore blank lines
-s: ignore lines that are the same
-w $COLUMNS: use full width of screen
The lines shown will be divided by |, <, or > -- see documentation, or just try it.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79135%2fis-there-a-condensed-side-by-side-diff-format%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The 2 diff tools I use the most would be meld and sdiff.
meld
Meld is a GUI but does a great job in showing diffs between files. It's geared more for software development with features such as the ability to move changes from one side to the other to merge changes but can be used as just a straight side-by-side diffing tool.
sdiff
I've used this tool for years. I generally run it with the following switches:
$ sdiff -bBWs file1 file2
-b
Ignore changes in the amount of white space.
-W
Ignore all white space.
-B
Ignore changes whose lines are all blank.
-s
Do not output common lines.
Often with log files you'll need to make the width of the columns wider, you can use -w <num>
to make the screen wider.
other tools that I use off and on
diffc
Diffc is a python script which colorizes unified diff output.
$ diffc [OPTION] FILE1 FILE2
vimdiff
Vimdiff is probably as good if not better than meld and it can be run from a terminal. I always forget to use it though which, to me, is a good indicator that I find the tool just a little to tough to use day to day. But YMMV.
1
One great feature of Meld, unfortunately not visible on your screenshot, is syntax highlighting of source code files.
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 14:35
Yes. I used to use vimdiff all the time, I've since moved to using meld, I find it easier to use and it's just easier to see what it's telling me vs. vimdiff.
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:42
@manatwork - added your link to the answer, thanks for the feedback!
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:51
1
Looks great for source code, but not so much for comparing log files. I often usecolordiff
from colordiff.org for source file. To my understanding,sdiff
is similar todiff -y
with no differences in output but slightly different options. +1 for showing some good alternatives to plain diff.
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:45
I've not ever used colordiff, I'll have to check it out. You're correct on thediff -y
. The addition of that switch todiff
seems to have happened at some point, or I never noticed it. Additionally here's a link to the gnu diff tools resource page. Good stuff for using this suite of tools.
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 16:15
add a comment |
The 2 diff tools I use the most would be meld and sdiff.
meld
Meld is a GUI but does a great job in showing diffs between files. It's geared more for software development with features such as the ability to move changes from one side to the other to merge changes but can be used as just a straight side-by-side diffing tool.
sdiff
I've used this tool for years. I generally run it with the following switches:
$ sdiff -bBWs file1 file2
-b
Ignore changes in the amount of white space.
-W
Ignore all white space.
-B
Ignore changes whose lines are all blank.
-s
Do not output common lines.
Often with log files you'll need to make the width of the columns wider, you can use -w <num>
to make the screen wider.
other tools that I use off and on
diffc
Diffc is a python script which colorizes unified diff output.
$ diffc [OPTION] FILE1 FILE2
vimdiff
Vimdiff is probably as good if not better than meld and it can be run from a terminal. I always forget to use it though which, to me, is a good indicator that I find the tool just a little to tough to use day to day. But YMMV.
1
One great feature of Meld, unfortunately not visible on your screenshot, is syntax highlighting of source code files.
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 14:35
Yes. I used to use vimdiff all the time, I've since moved to using meld, I find it easier to use and it's just easier to see what it's telling me vs. vimdiff.
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:42
@manatwork - added your link to the answer, thanks for the feedback!
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:51
1
Looks great for source code, but not so much for comparing log files. I often usecolordiff
from colordiff.org for source file. To my understanding,sdiff
is similar todiff -y
with no differences in output but slightly different options. +1 for showing some good alternatives to plain diff.
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:45
I've not ever used colordiff, I'll have to check it out. You're correct on thediff -y
. The addition of that switch todiff
seems to have happened at some point, or I never noticed it. Additionally here's a link to the gnu diff tools resource page. Good stuff for using this suite of tools.
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 16:15
add a comment |
The 2 diff tools I use the most would be meld and sdiff.
meld
Meld is a GUI but does a great job in showing diffs between files. It's geared more for software development with features such as the ability to move changes from one side to the other to merge changes but can be used as just a straight side-by-side diffing tool.
sdiff
I've used this tool for years. I generally run it with the following switches:
$ sdiff -bBWs file1 file2
-b
Ignore changes in the amount of white space.
-W
Ignore all white space.
-B
Ignore changes whose lines are all blank.
-s
Do not output common lines.
Often with log files you'll need to make the width of the columns wider, you can use -w <num>
to make the screen wider.
other tools that I use off and on
diffc
Diffc is a python script which colorizes unified diff output.
$ diffc [OPTION] FILE1 FILE2
vimdiff
Vimdiff is probably as good if not better than meld and it can be run from a terminal. I always forget to use it though which, to me, is a good indicator that I find the tool just a little to tough to use day to day. But YMMV.
The 2 diff tools I use the most would be meld and sdiff.
meld
Meld is a GUI but does a great job in showing diffs between files. It's geared more for software development with features such as the ability to move changes from one side to the other to merge changes but can be used as just a straight side-by-side diffing tool.
sdiff
I've used this tool for years. I generally run it with the following switches:
$ sdiff -bBWs file1 file2
-b
Ignore changes in the amount of white space.
-W
Ignore all white space.
-B
Ignore changes whose lines are all blank.
-s
Do not output common lines.
Often with log files you'll need to make the width of the columns wider, you can use -w <num>
to make the screen wider.
other tools that I use off and on
diffc
Diffc is a python script which colorizes unified diff output.
$ diffc [OPTION] FILE1 FILE2
vimdiff
Vimdiff is probably as good if not better than meld and it can be run from a terminal. I always forget to use it though which, to me, is a good indicator that I find the tool just a little to tough to use day to day. But YMMV.
edited Jun 12 '13 at 14:51
answered Jun 12 '13 at 14:27
slm♦slm
251k69529685
251k69529685
1
One great feature of Meld, unfortunately not visible on your screenshot, is syntax highlighting of source code files.
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 14:35
Yes. I used to use vimdiff all the time, I've since moved to using meld, I find it easier to use and it's just easier to see what it's telling me vs. vimdiff.
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:42
@manatwork - added your link to the answer, thanks for the feedback!
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:51
1
Looks great for source code, but not so much for comparing log files. I often usecolordiff
from colordiff.org for source file. To my understanding,sdiff
is similar todiff -y
with no differences in output but slightly different options. +1 for showing some good alternatives to plain diff.
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:45
I've not ever used colordiff, I'll have to check it out. You're correct on thediff -y
. The addition of that switch todiff
seems to have happened at some point, or I never noticed it. Additionally here's a link to the gnu diff tools resource page. Good stuff for using this suite of tools.
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 16:15
add a comment |
1
One great feature of Meld, unfortunately not visible on your screenshot, is syntax highlighting of source code files.
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 14:35
Yes. I used to use vimdiff all the time, I've since moved to using meld, I find it easier to use and it's just easier to see what it's telling me vs. vimdiff.
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:42
@manatwork - added your link to the answer, thanks for the feedback!
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:51
1
Looks great for source code, but not so much for comparing log files. I often usecolordiff
from colordiff.org for source file. To my understanding,sdiff
is similar todiff -y
with no differences in output but slightly different options. +1 for showing some good alternatives to plain diff.
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:45
I've not ever used colordiff, I'll have to check it out. You're correct on thediff -y
. The addition of that switch todiff
seems to have happened at some point, or I never noticed it. Additionally here's a link to the gnu diff tools resource page. Good stuff for using this suite of tools.
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 16:15
1
1
One great feature of Meld, unfortunately not visible on your screenshot, is syntax highlighting of source code files.
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 14:35
One great feature of Meld, unfortunately not visible on your screenshot, is syntax highlighting of source code files.
– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 14:35
Yes. I used to use vimdiff all the time, I've since moved to using meld, I find it easier to use and it's just easier to see what it's telling me vs. vimdiff.
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:42
Yes. I used to use vimdiff all the time, I've since moved to using meld, I find it easier to use and it's just easier to see what it's telling me vs. vimdiff.
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:42
@manatwork - added your link to the answer, thanks for the feedback!
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:51
@manatwork - added your link to the answer, thanks for the feedback!
– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 14:51
1
1
Looks great for source code, but not so much for comparing log files. I often use
colordiff
from colordiff.org for source file. To my understanding, sdiff
is similar to diff -y
with no differences in output but slightly different options. +1 for showing some good alternatives to plain diff.– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:45
Looks great for source code, but not so much for comparing log files. I often use
colordiff
from colordiff.org for source file. To my understanding, sdiff
is similar to diff -y
with no differences in output but slightly different options. +1 for showing some good alternatives to plain diff.– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:45
I've not ever used colordiff, I'll have to check it out. You're correct on the
diff -y
. The addition of that switch to diff
seems to have happened at some point, or I never noticed it. Additionally here's a link to the gnu diff tools resource page. Good stuff for using this suite of tools.– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 16:15
I've not ever used colordiff, I'll have to check it out. You're correct on the
diff -y
. The addition of that switch to diff
seems to have happened at some point, or I never noticed it. Additionally here's a link to the gnu diff tools resource page. Good stuff for using this suite of tools.– slm♦
Jun 12 '13 at 16:15
add a comment |
Currently I am using side-by-side diff with grep filtering the different lines:
diff -y -W250 log.txt log2.txt | expand |
grep -E -C3 '^.{123} [|<>]( |$)' | colordiff | less -rS
- Option
-W250
makes the output wider such that I can see more data.
expand
is necessary to convert tabs to spaces
-C3
adds 3 lines of context to the grep output.
^.{123}
matches half of the data before the side-by-side diff markers.
colordiff
makes the output prettier to follow
less -rS
allows ANSI colors to be interpreted (-r
) and prevents wrapped lines (-S
).
This is a hack, alternatives are welcome.
1
This is wonderful.
– Pat Myron
Mar 17 '17 at 3:52
Nice idea. Unfortunately thegrep
regex is too slow. Alsodiff
has a-t
option to expand tabs.
– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:48
add a comment |
Currently I am using side-by-side diff with grep filtering the different lines:
diff -y -W250 log.txt log2.txt | expand |
grep -E -C3 '^.{123} [|<>]( |$)' | colordiff | less -rS
- Option
-W250
makes the output wider such that I can see more data.
expand
is necessary to convert tabs to spaces
-C3
adds 3 lines of context to the grep output.
^.{123}
matches half of the data before the side-by-side diff markers.
colordiff
makes the output prettier to follow
less -rS
allows ANSI colors to be interpreted (-r
) and prevents wrapped lines (-S
).
This is a hack, alternatives are welcome.
1
This is wonderful.
– Pat Myron
Mar 17 '17 at 3:52
Nice idea. Unfortunately thegrep
regex is too slow. Alsodiff
has a-t
option to expand tabs.
– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:48
add a comment |
Currently I am using side-by-side diff with grep filtering the different lines:
diff -y -W250 log.txt log2.txt | expand |
grep -E -C3 '^.{123} [|<>]( |$)' | colordiff | less -rS
- Option
-W250
makes the output wider such that I can see more data.
expand
is necessary to convert tabs to spaces
-C3
adds 3 lines of context to the grep output.
^.{123}
matches half of the data before the side-by-side diff markers.
colordiff
makes the output prettier to follow
less -rS
allows ANSI colors to be interpreted (-r
) and prevents wrapped lines (-S
).
This is a hack, alternatives are welcome.
Currently I am using side-by-side diff with grep filtering the different lines:
diff -y -W250 log.txt log2.txt | expand |
grep -E -C3 '^.{123} [|<>]( |$)' | colordiff | less -rS
- Option
-W250
makes the output wider such that I can see more data.
expand
is necessary to convert tabs to spaces
-C3
adds 3 lines of context to the grep output.
^.{123}
matches half of the data before the side-by-side diff markers.
colordiff
makes the output prettier to follow
less -rS
allows ANSI colors to be interpreted (-r
) and prevents wrapped lines (-S
).
This is a hack, alternatives are welcome.
answered Jun 12 '13 at 10:55
LekensteynLekensteyn
9,963115288
9,963115288
1
This is wonderful.
– Pat Myron
Mar 17 '17 at 3:52
Nice idea. Unfortunately thegrep
regex is too slow. Alsodiff
has a-t
option to expand tabs.
– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:48
add a comment |
1
This is wonderful.
– Pat Myron
Mar 17 '17 at 3:52
Nice idea. Unfortunately thegrep
regex is too slow. Alsodiff
has a-t
option to expand tabs.
– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:48
1
1
This is wonderful.
– Pat Myron
Mar 17 '17 at 3:52
This is wonderful.
– Pat Myron
Mar 17 '17 at 3:52
Nice idea. Unfortunately the
grep
regex is too slow. Also diff
has a -t
option to expand tabs.– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:48
Nice idea. Unfortunately the
grep
regex is too slow. Also diff
has a -t
option to expand tabs.– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:48
add a comment |
Nobody mentioned icdiff yet? It's great! Pic speaks for itself:
This is a very neat tool, also available on aur.
– Uzumaki D. Ichigo
Feb 16 '18 at 10:09
Too slow for large files though.
– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:30
add a comment |
Nobody mentioned icdiff yet? It's great! Pic speaks for itself:
This is a very neat tool, also available on aur.
– Uzumaki D. Ichigo
Feb 16 '18 at 10:09
Too slow for large files though.
– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:30
add a comment |
Nobody mentioned icdiff yet? It's great! Pic speaks for itself:
Nobody mentioned icdiff yet? It's great! Pic speaks for itself:
answered May 24 '17 at 10:07
Radek PostołowiczRadek Postołowicz
21125
21125
This is a very neat tool, also available on aur.
– Uzumaki D. Ichigo
Feb 16 '18 at 10:09
Too slow for large files though.
– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:30
add a comment |
This is a very neat tool, also available on aur.
– Uzumaki D. Ichigo
Feb 16 '18 at 10:09
Too slow for large files though.
– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:30
This is a very neat tool, also available on aur.
– Uzumaki D. Ichigo
Feb 16 '18 at 10:09
This is a very neat tool, also available on aur.
– Uzumaki D. Ichigo
Feb 16 '18 at 10:09
Too slow for large files though.
– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:30
Too slow for large files though.
– Timmmm
Jul 27 '18 at 13:30
add a comment |
The linux "sdiff" command shows side-by-side differences, by default including all lines, but you can use various options to show only differences:
sdiff -tWBs -w $COLUMNS config.xml config.xml.original
where
-t: translate tabs to spaces
-W: ignore whitespace differences
-B: ignore blank lines
-s: ignore lines that are the same
-w $COLUMNS: use full width of screen
The lines shown will be divided by |, <, or > -- see documentation, or just try it.
New contributor
add a comment |
The linux "sdiff" command shows side-by-side differences, by default including all lines, but you can use various options to show only differences:
sdiff -tWBs -w $COLUMNS config.xml config.xml.original
where
-t: translate tabs to spaces
-W: ignore whitespace differences
-B: ignore blank lines
-s: ignore lines that are the same
-w $COLUMNS: use full width of screen
The lines shown will be divided by |, <, or > -- see documentation, or just try it.
New contributor
add a comment |
The linux "sdiff" command shows side-by-side differences, by default including all lines, but you can use various options to show only differences:
sdiff -tWBs -w $COLUMNS config.xml config.xml.original
where
-t: translate tabs to spaces
-W: ignore whitespace differences
-B: ignore blank lines
-s: ignore lines that are the same
-w $COLUMNS: use full width of screen
The lines shown will be divided by |, <, or > -- see documentation, or just try it.
New contributor
The linux "sdiff" command shows side-by-side differences, by default including all lines, but you can use various options to show only differences:
sdiff -tWBs -w $COLUMNS config.xml config.xml.original
where
-t: translate tabs to spaces
-W: ignore whitespace differences
-B: ignore blank lines
-s: ignore lines that are the same
-w $COLUMNS: use full width of screen
The lines shown will be divided by |, <, or > -- see documentation, or just try it.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 40 mins ago
Moshe YudkowskyMoshe Yudkowsky
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79135%2fis-there-a-condensed-side-by-side-diff-format%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Does your
diff
have--suppress-common-lines
option? pastebin.com/KZrVCNFR– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 10:46
1
@manatwork Nice, it does. Any way to add more context (e.g. line numbers)?
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 10:50
5
Then maybe
vimdiff
(from the vim package) would serve your needs better: parallel display, colorized, common lines folded. Line numbers can be turned on with:set number
.– manatwork
Jun 12 '13 at 11:07
I think you should put vimdiff up as an answer :)
– Kotte
Jun 12 '13 at 14:03
1
CLI tools are preferred, but GUI tools are also allowed if they are tiny enough. I have tried kdiff3, but it still produced to much detail. Ideally, I don't see all unnecessary detail. I'll attach two data sets.
– Lekensteyn
Jun 12 '13 at 15:30