Is there any way to turn an existing Javascript object into an array without creating a new separate array?
There are a lot of mentions on differentes readings that arrays are a special class of object in Javascript. For example here:
https://www.codingame.com/playgrounds/6181/javascript-arrays---tips-tricks-and-examples
So, and since an object
is a collection of properties (or keys) and values, I was thinking if there is a way to start with an object and ends with an array (in the sense that the method Array.isArray()
returns true
for that object emulating an array). I have started looking at the arrays properties:
let arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(arr));
console.log(Array.isArray(arr));
So I tried to emulate the same using an object:
let arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, 3:3, 4:4, 5:5, "length":6};
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
But Array.isArray(arrEmulation)
still returns false
. First, I want to apologize if this is an stupid question, but is there any way I can manually convert an object
to array
adding special properties (or keys) to it?
Please, note I don't want to know how to convert object to array, I just want to understand which are those special things that make possible to interpret an object like an array.
javascript arrays object
New contributor
add a comment |
There are a lot of mentions on differentes readings that arrays are a special class of object in Javascript. For example here:
https://www.codingame.com/playgrounds/6181/javascript-arrays---tips-tricks-and-examples
So, and since an object
is a collection of properties (or keys) and values, I was thinking if there is a way to start with an object and ends with an array (in the sense that the method Array.isArray()
returns true
for that object emulating an array). I have started looking at the arrays properties:
let arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(arr));
console.log(Array.isArray(arr));
So I tried to emulate the same using an object:
let arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, 3:3, 4:4, 5:5, "length":6};
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
But Array.isArray(arrEmulation)
still returns false
. First, I want to apologize if this is an stupid question, but is there any way I can manually convert an object
to array
adding special properties (or keys) to it?
Please, note I don't want to know how to convert object to array, I just want to understand which are those special things that make possible to interpret an object like an array.
javascript arrays object
New contributor
1
Possible duplicate of How to convert an Object {} to an Array of key-value pairs in JavaScript
– jmargolisvt
2 hours ago
7
I don't believe the suggested duplicate addresses this portion of OP's question: "I just want to understand which are those special things that make possible to interpret an object like an array." OP, perhaps this MIT article might be of use. It's the one referenced in MDN's ownisArray()
documentation... though I'm not sure it really hits the detail you're looking for.
– Tyler Roper
2 hours ago
1
@jmargolisvt I don't want to know how to convert an object to array, I want to undesrtand what are the properties or keys that I need to add to an object so they are interpreted like an array.
– SmaGal
2 hours ago
@TylerRoper thanks, I'm going to give it a read...
– SmaGal
2 hours ago
1
Looking at the MDN polyfill (developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…) perhaps you can try gettingObject.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation)
to return[object Array]
. I'm not sure what the definition of that function is though.
– david
1 hour ago
add a comment |
There are a lot of mentions on differentes readings that arrays are a special class of object in Javascript. For example here:
https://www.codingame.com/playgrounds/6181/javascript-arrays---tips-tricks-and-examples
So, and since an object
is a collection of properties (or keys) and values, I was thinking if there is a way to start with an object and ends with an array (in the sense that the method Array.isArray()
returns true
for that object emulating an array). I have started looking at the arrays properties:
let arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(arr));
console.log(Array.isArray(arr));
So I tried to emulate the same using an object:
let arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, 3:3, 4:4, 5:5, "length":6};
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
But Array.isArray(arrEmulation)
still returns false
. First, I want to apologize if this is an stupid question, but is there any way I can manually convert an object
to array
adding special properties (or keys) to it?
Please, note I don't want to know how to convert object to array, I just want to understand which are those special things that make possible to interpret an object like an array.
javascript arrays object
New contributor
There are a lot of mentions on differentes readings that arrays are a special class of object in Javascript. For example here:
https://www.codingame.com/playgrounds/6181/javascript-arrays---tips-tricks-and-examples
So, and since an object
is a collection of properties (or keys) and values, I was thinking if there is a way to start with an object and ends with an array (in the sense that the method Array.isArray()
returns true
for that object emulating an array). I have started looking at the arrays properties:
let arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(arr));
console.log(Array.isArray(arr));
So I tried to emulate the same using an object:
let arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, 3:3, 4:4, 5:5, "length":6};
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
But Array.isArray(arrEmulation)
still returns false
. First, I want to apologize if this is an stupid question, but is there any way I can manually convert an object
to array
adding special properties (or keys) to it?
Please, note I don't want to know how to convert object to array, I just want to understand which are those special things that make possible to interpret an object like an array.
let arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(arr));
console.log(Array.isArray(arr));
let arr = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(arr));
console.log(Array.isArray(arr));
let arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, 3:3, 4:4, 5:5, "length":6};
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
let arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, 3:3, 4:4, 5:5, "length":6};
console.log(Object.getOwnPropertyNames(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
javascript arrays object
javascript arrays object
New contributor
New contributor
edited 43 mins ago
CertainPerformance
84.3k154169
84.3k154169
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
SmaGalSmaGal
625
625
New contributor
New contributor
1
Possible duplicate of How to convert an Object {} to an Array of key-value pairs in JavaScript
– jmargolisvt
2 hours ago
7
I don't believe the suggested duplicate addresses this portion of OP's question: "I just want to understand which are those special things that make possible to interpret an object like an array." OP, perhaps this MIT article might be of use. It's the one referenced in MDN's ownisArray()
documentation... though I'm not sure it really hits the detail you're looking for.
– Tyler Roper
2 hours ago
1
@jmargolisvt I don't want to know how to convert an object to array, I want to undesrtand what are the properties or keys that I need to add to an object so they are interpreted like an array.
– SmaGal
2 hours ago
@TylerRoper thanks, I'm going to give it a read...
– SmaGal
2 hours ago
1
Looking at the MDN polyfill (developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…) perhaps you can try gettingObject.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation)
to return[object Array]
. I'm not sure what the definition of that function is though.
– david
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
Possible duplicate of How to convert an Object {} to an Array of key-value pairs in JavaScript
– jmargolisvt
2 hours ago
7
I don't believe the suggested duplicate addresses this portion of OP's question: "I just want to understand which are those special things that make possible to interpret an object like an array." OP, perhaps this MIT article might be of use. It's the one referenced in MDN's ownisArray()
documentation... though I'm not sure it really hits the detail you're looking for.
– Tyler Roper
2 hours ago
1
@jmargolisvt I don't want to know how to convert an object to array, I want to undesrtand what are the properties or keys that I need to add to an object so they are interpreted like an array.
– SmaGal
2 hours ago
@TylerRoper thanks, I'm going to give it a read...
– SmaGal
2 hours ago
1
Looking at the MDN polyfill (developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…) perhaps you can try gettingObject.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation)
to return[object Array]
. I'm not sure what the definition of that function is though.
– david
1 hour ago
1
1
Possible duplicate of How to convert an Object {} to an Array of key-value pairs in JavaScript
– jmargolisvt
2 hours ago
Possible duplicate of How to convert an Object {} to an Array of key-value pairs in JavaScript
– jmargolisvt
2 hours ago
7
7
I don't believe the suggested duplicate addresses this portion of OP's question: "I just want to understand which are those special things that make possible to interpret an object like an array." OP, perhaps this MIT article might be of use. It's the one referenced in MDN's own
isArray()
documentation... though I'm not sure it really hits the detail you're looking for.– Tyler Roper
2 hours ago
I don't believe the suggested duplicate addresses this portion of OP's question: "I just want to understand which are those special things that make possible to interpret an object like an array." OP, perhaps this MIT article might be of use. It's the one referenced in MDN's own
isArray()
documentation... though I'm not sure it really hits the detail you're looking for.– Tyler Roper
2 hours ago
1
1
@jmargolisvt I don't want to know how to convert an object to array, I want to undesrtand what are the properties or keys that I need to add to an object so they are interpreted like an array.
– SmaGal
2 hours ago
@jmargolisvt I don't want to know how to convert an object to array, I want to undesrtand what are the properties or keys that I need to add to an object so they are interpreted like an array.
– SmaGal
2 hours ago
@TylerRoper thanks, I'm going to give it a read...
– SmaGal
2 hours ago
@TylerRoper thanks, I'm going to give it a read...
– SmaGal
2 hours ago
1
1
Looking at the MDN polyfill (developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…) perhaps you can try getting
Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation)
to return [object Array]
. I'm not sure what the definition of that function is though.– david
1 hour ago
Looking at the MDN polyfill (developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…) perhaps you can try getting
Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation)
to return [object Array]
. I'm not sure what the definition of that function is though.– david
1 hour ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
I don't think it's possible, in the strictest sense, given the standard specification. Looking up Array.isArray:
If the value of the [[Class]] internal property of arg is "Array", then return true.
So, for Array.isArray(arrEmulation)
to return true
, you must somehow modify the [[Class]]
of the object to be Array
, rather than Object
. But, looking at ES5's 8.6.2 Object Internal Properties and Methods regarding [[Class]]
:
Note: This specification defines no ECMAScript language operators or built-in functions that permit a program to modify an object’s [[Class]] or [[Prototype]] internal properties or to change the value of [[Extensible]] from false to true. Implementation specific extensions that modify [[Class]], [[Prototype]] or [[Extensible]] must not violate the invariants defined in the preceding paragraph.
Also:
Note that this specification does not provide any means for a program to access that value except through
Object.prototype.toString
So, the official specification doesn't provide a way to do it in ES5 - if there was a way to do it, it would be non-standard and implementation dependent.
That said, unless you absolutely need to use Array.isArray
or have Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation)
to return [object Array]
, you can still use Object.setPrototypeOf
to set the prototype of arrEmulation
to Array.prototype
, allowing you to use array methods on the object and have instanceof Array
return true
:
const arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, "length":6};
Object.setPrototypeOf(arrEmulation, Array.prototype);
console.log(arrEmulation instanceof Array);
arrEmulation.forEach((value) => {
console.log(value);
});
// Internal [[Class]] property is still `Object`, though:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
// Unlike a true array:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call());
console.log('-----');
// although you can set the `toStringTag` to the string 'Array' in ES6+,
// it is cosmetic only and does not pass an `Array.isArray` test:
arrEmulation[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'Array';
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
But note that you should avoid using Object.setPrototypeOf
in real code:
Warning: Changing the
[[Prototype]]
of an object is, by the nature of how modern JavaScript engines optimize property accesses, a very slow operation, in every browser and JavaScript engine. The effects on performance of altering inheritance are subtle and far-flung, and are not limited to simply the time spent in theObject.setPrototypeOf(...)
statement, but may extend to any code that has access to any object whose[[Prototype]]
has been altered. If you care about performance you should avoid setting the[[Prototype]]
of an object. Instead, create a new object with the desired[[Prototype]]
usingObject.create()
.
(of course, Object.create
involves creating a new object, which is different from what you want to do, which is to change the existing arrEmulation
object)
There doesn't look to be a way to do it in ES6+ either - its text is somewhat similar, but not identical. Specifically, for Array.isArray
to return true
, the object in question needs to be an "Array exotic object" (or a Proxy
that points to one) - but setPrototypeOf
only sets the prototype, neither it nor any other method can make the object actually become an Array exotic object (which looks like it has to be natively constructed by the interpreter, and is not emulatable enough).
Thanks dude, this information gives me some more clarity to understand the differences between and standard object and an array. Just to you know, I'm not really looking to emulate an array with an object, but just to understand they differences and this helps me. +1!
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Javascript is all about prototypal inheritance:
Prototype Inheritance
All JavaScript objects inherit properties and methods from a
prototype:
Date objects inherit from Date.prototype Array objects inherit from
Array.prototype Person objects inherit from Person.prototype The
Object.prototype is on the top of the prototype inheritance chain:
Date objects, Array objects, and Person objects inherit from
Object.prototype.
As seen here isArray is an function in prototype chain of the Array object.
An alternative as suggested in MDN Array.isArray() alternate if isArray is not present is:
if (!Array.isArray) {
Array.isArray = function(arg) {
return Object.prototype.toString.call(arg) === '[object Array]';
};
}
So the type is determined by the prototype chain instead of what value it returns.
Similarly, as per Tio Zed's answer
const newArray = Array.from(arrEmulation) // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Array.isArray(newArray)
What it really does is just change to prototype from that of object to that of an Array.
Hum... nope. That's not whatArray.isArray
checks. That is a simple polyfill posted on an MDN article, it is in no way how any browser will implement it. Here is what the specs asks though they're not clear as to how the check is made to know if it is an Array exotic Object. And here is a proof that it's not how it is implemented: jsfiddle.net/f6182mkh
– Kaiido
40 mins ago
I edited my answer I just wanted to show that it all depends on prototypes and not the keys they see in the value. BTW thanks for correcting me. Please edit my answer if you still feel something wrong with my answer. @Kaiido
– Black Mamba
34 mins ago
Well even the prototype thing is not correct either: jsfiddle.net/vLrgdp86
– Kaiido
30 mins ago
add a comment |
You can convert anything that is close enough to an array by using Array.from().
In your example, we could just call:
const arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, 3:3, 4:4, 5:5, length: 6};
const newArray = Array.from(arrEmulation) // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Array.isArray(newArray) // true
1
I'm not looking at how to convert object to array, but to understand they differences...
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
1
@SmaGal, be fair - do you not say 'convert' in the question title?
– eric99
59 mins ago
@eric99 the down-vote don't come from me. I just explained that I was not looking for that.
– SmaGal
29 mins ago
@SmaGal my comment was a bit tongue-in-cheek. TioZed deserves some credit for his answer, given the question has now morphed into something more specific.
– eric99
23 mins ago
add a comment |
//converting object to array.
var person = {
name: 'manav',
age: '21'
}
var answer = function () {
return Object.keys(person).map(i => person[i])
}
console.log(answer());
simplest way to do it.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
SmaGal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54527480%2fis-there-any-way-to-turn-an-existing-javascript-object-into-an-array-without-cre%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I don't think it's possible, in the strictest sense, given the standard specification. Looking up Array.isArray:
If the value of the [[Class]] internal property of arg is "Array", then return true.
So, for Array.isArray(arrEmulation)
to return true
, you must somehow modify the [[Class]]
of the object to be Array
, rather than Object
. But, looking at ES5's 8.6.2 Object Internal Properties and Methods regarding [[Class]]
:
Note: This specification defines no ECMAScript language operators or built-in functions that permit a program to modify an object’s [[Class]] or [[Prototype]] internal properties or to change the value of [[Extensible]] from false to true. Implementation specific extensions that modify [[Class]], [[Prototype]] or [[Extensible]] must not violate the invariants defined in the preceding paragraph.
Also:
Note that this specification does not provide any means for a program to access that value except through
Object.prototype.toString
So, the official specification doesn't provide a way to do it in ES5 - if there was a way to do it, it would be non-standard and implementation dependent.
That said, unless you absolutely need to use Array.isArray
or have Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation)
to return [object Array]
, you can still use Object.setPrototypeOf
to set the prototype of arrEmulation
to Array.prototype
, allowing you to use array methods on the object and have instanceof Array
return true
:
const arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, "length":6};
Object.setPrototypeOf(arrEmulation, Array.prototype);
console.log(arrEmulation instanceof Array);
arrEmulation.forEach((value) => {
console.log(value);
});
// Internal [[Class]] property is still `Object`, though:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
// Unlike a true array:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call());
console.log('-----');
// although you can set the `toStringTag` to the string 'Array' in ES6+,
// it is cosmetic only and does not pass an `Array.isArray` test:
arrEmulation[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'Array';
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
But note that you should avoid using Object.setPrototypeOf
in real code:
Warning: Changing the
[[Prototype]]
of an object is, by the nature of how modern JavaScript engines optimize property accesses, a very slow operation, in every browser and JavaScript engine. The effects on performance of altering inheritance are subtle and far-flung, and are not limited to simply the time spent in theObject.setPrototypeOf(...)
statement, but may extend to any code that has access to any object whose[[Prototype]]
has been altered. If you care about performance you should avoid setting the[[Prototype]]
of an object. Instead, create a new object with the desired[[Prototype]]
usingObject.create()
.
(of course, Object.create
involves creating a new object, which is different from what you want to do, which is to change the existing arrEmulation
object)
There doesn't look to be a way to do it in ES6+ either - its text is somewhat similar, but not identical. Specifically, for Array.isArray
to return true
, the object in question needs to be an "Array exotic object" (or a Proxy
that points to one) - but setPrototypeOf
only sets the prototype, neither it nor any other method can make the object actually become an Array exotic object (which looks like it has to be natively constructed by the interpreter, and is not emulatable enough).
Thanks dude, this information gives me some more clarity to understand the differences between and standard object and an array. Just to you know, I'm not really looking to emulate an array with an object, but just to understand they differences and this helps me. +1!
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I don't think it's possible, in the strictest sense, given the standard specification. Looking up Array.isArray:
If the value of the [[Class]] internal property of arg is "Array", then return true.
So, for Array.isArray(arrEmulation)
to return true
, you must somehow modify the [[Class]]
of the object to be Array
, rather than Object
. But, looking at ES5's 8.6.2 Object Internal Properties and Methods regarding [[Class]]
:
Note: This specification defines no ECMAScript language operators or built-in functions that permit a program to modify an object’s [[Class]] or [[Prototype]] internal properties or to change the value of [[Extensible]] from false to true. Implementation specific extensions that modify [[Class]], [[Prototype]] or [[Extensible]] must not violate the invariants defined in the preceding paragraph.
Also:
Note that this specification does not provide any means for a program to access that value except through
Object.prototype.toString
So, the official specification doesn't provide a way to do it in ES5 - if there was a way to do it, it would be non-standard and implementation dependent.
That said, unless you absolutely need to use Array.isArray
or have Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation)
to return [object Array]
, you can still use Object.setPrototypeOf
to set the prototype of arrEmulation
to Array.prototype
, allowing you to use array methods on the object and have instanceof Array
return true
:
const arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, "length":6};
Object.setPrototypeOf(arrEmulation, Array.prototype);
console.log(arrEmulation instanceof Array);
arrEmulation.forEach((value) => {
console.log(value);
});
// Internal [[Class]] property is still `Object`, though:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
// Unlike a true array:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call());
console.log('-----');
// although you can set the `toStringTag` to the string 'Array' in ES6+,
// it is cosmetic only and does not pass an `Array.isArray` test:
arrEmulation[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'Array';
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
But note that you should avoid using Object.setPrototypeOf
in real code:
Warning: Changing the
[[Prototype]]
of an object is, by the nature of how modern JavaScript engines optimize property accesses, a very slow operation, in every browser and JavaScript engine. The effects on performance of altering inheritance are subtle and far-flung, and are not limited to simply the time spent in theObject.setPrototypeOf(...)
statement, but may extend to any code that has access to any object whose[[Prototype]]
has been altered. If you care about performance you should avoid setting the[[Prototype]]
of an object. Instead, create a new object with the desired[[Prototype]]
usingObject.create()
.
(of course, Object.create
involves creating a new object, which is different from what you want to do, which is to change the existing arrEmulation
object)
There doesn't look to be a way to do it in ES6+ either - its text is somewhat similar, but not identical. Specifically, for Array.isArray
to return true
, the object in question needs to be an "Array exotic object" (or a Proxy
that points to one) - but setPrototypeOf
only sets the prototype, neither it nor any other method can make the object actually become an Array exotic object (which looks like it has to be natively constructed by the interpreter, and is not emulatable enough).
Thanks dude, this information gives me some more clarity to understand the differences between and standard object and an array. Just to you know, I'm not really looking to emulate an array with an object, but just to understand they differences and this helps me. +1!
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I don't think it's possible, in the strictest sense, given the standard specification. Looking up Array.isArray:
If the value of the [[Class]] internal property of arg is "Array", then return true.
So, for Array.isArray(arrEmulation)
to return true
, you must somehow modify the [[Class]]
of the object to be Array
, rather than Object
. But, looking at ES5's 8.6.2 Object Internal Properties and Methods regarding [[Class]]
:
Note: This specification defines no ECMAScript language operators or built-in functions that permit a program to modify an object’s [[Class]] or [[Prototype]] internal properties or to change the value of [[Extensible]] from false to true. Implementation specific extensions that modify [[Class]], [[Prototype]] or [[Extensible]] must not violate the invariants defined in the preceding paragraph.
Also:
Note that this specification does not provide any means for a program to access that value except through
Object.prototype.toString
So, the official specification doesn't provide a way to do it in ES5 - if there was a way to do it, it would be non-standard and implementation dependent.
That said, unless you absolutely need to use Array.isArray
or have Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation)
to return [object Array]
, you can still use Object.setPrototypeOf
to set the prototype of arrEmulation
to Array.prototype
, allowing you to use array methods on the object and have instanceof Array
return true
:
const arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, "length":6};
Object.setPrototypeOf(arrEmulation, Array.prototype);
console.log(arrEmulation instanceof Array);
arrEmulation.forEach((value) => {
console.log(value);
});
// Internal [[Class]] property is still `Object`, though:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
// Unlike a true array:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call());
console.log('-----');
// although you can set the `toStringTag` to the string 'Array' in ES6+,
// it is cosmetic only and does not pass an `Array.isArray` test:
arrEmulation[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'Array';
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
But note that you should avoid using Object.setPrototypeOf
in real code:
Warning: Changing the
[[Prototype]]
of an object is, by the nature of how modern JavaScript engines optimize property accesses, a very slow operation, in every browser and JavaScript engine. The effects on performance of altering inheritance are subtle and far-flung, and are not limited to simply the time spent in theObject.setPrototypeOf(...)
statement, but may extend to any code that has access to any object whose[[Prototype]]
has been altered. If you care about performance you should avoid setting the[[Prototype]]
of an object. Instead, create a new object with the desired[[Prototype]]
usingObject.create()
.
(of course, Object.create
involves creating a new object, which is different from what you want to do, which is to change the existing arrEmulation
object)
There doesn't look to be a way to do it in ES6+ either - its text is somewhat similar, but not identical. Specifically, for Array.isArray
to return true
, the object in question needs to be an "Array exotic object" (or a Proxy
that points to one) - but setPrototypeOf
only sets the prototype, neither it nor any other method can make the object actually become an Array exotic object (which looks like it has to be natively constructed by the interpreter, and is not emulatable enough).
I don't think it's possible, in the strictest sense, given the standard specification. Looking up Array.isArray:
If the value of the [[Class]] internal property of arg is "Array", then return true.
So, for Array.isArray(arrEmulation)
to return true
, you must somehow modify the [[Class]]
of the object to be Array
, rather than Object
. But, looking at ES5's 8.6.2 Object Internal Properties and Methods regarding [[Class]]
:
Note: This specification defines no ECMAScript language operators or built-in functions that permit a program to modify an object’s [[Class]] or [[Prototype]] internal properties or to change the value of [[Extensible]] from false to true. Implementation specific extensions that modify [[Class]], [[Prototype]] or [[Extensible]] must not violate the invariants defined in the preceding paragraph.
Also:
Note that this specification does not provide any means for a program to access that value except through
Object.prototype.toString
So, the official specification doesn't provide a way to do it in ES5 - if there was a way to do it, it would be non-standard and implementation dependent.
That said, unless you absolutely need to use Array.isArray
or have Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation)
to return [object Array]
, you can still use Object.setPrototypeOf
to set the prototype of arrEmulation
to Array.prototype
, allowing you to use array methods on the object and have instanceof Array
return true
:
const arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, "length":6};
Object.setPrototypeOf(arrEmulation, Array.prototype);
console.log(arrEmulation instanceof Array);
arrEmulation.forEach((value) => {
console.log(value);
});
// Internal [[Class]] property is still `Object`, though:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
// Unlike a true array:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call());
console.log('-----');
// although you can set the `toStringTag` to the string 'Array' in ES6+,
// it is cosmetic only and does not pass an `Array.isArray` test:
arrEmulation[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'Array';
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
But note that you should avoid using Object.setPrototypeOf
in real code:
Warning: Changing the
[[Prototype]]
of an object is, by the nature of how modern JavaScript engines optimize property accesses, a very slow operation, in every browser and JavaScript engine. The effects on performance of altering inheritance are subtle and far-flung, and are not limited to simply the time spent in theObject.setPrototypeOf(...)
statement, but may extend to any code that has access to any object whose[[Prototype]]
has been altered. If you care about performance you should avoid setting the[[Prototype]]
of an object. Instead, create a new object with the desired[[Prototype]]
usingObject.create()
.
(of course, Object.create
involves creating a new object, which is different from what you want to do, which is to change the existing arrEmulation
object)
There doesn't look to be a way to do it in ES6+ either - its text is somewhat similar, but not identical. Specifically, for Array.isArray
to return true
, the object in question needs to be an "Array exotic object" (or a Proxy
that points to one) - but setPrototypeOf
only sets the prototype, neither it nor any other method can make the object actually become an Array exotic object (which looks like it has to be natively constructed by the interpreter, and is not emulatable enough).
const arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, "length":6};
Object.setPrototypeOf(arrEmulation, Array.prototype);
console.log(arrEmulation instanceof Array);
arrEmulation.forEach((value) => {
console.log(value);
});
// Internal [[Class]] property is still `Object`, though:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
// Unlike a true array:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call());
console.log('-----');
// although you can set the `toStringTag` to the string 'Array' in ES6+,
// it is cosmetic only and does not pass an `Array.isArray` test:
arrEmulation[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'Array';
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
const arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, "length":6};
Object.setPrototypeOf(arrEmulation, Array.prototype);
console.log(arrEmulation instanceof Array);
arrEmulation.forEach((value) => {
console.log(value);
});
// Internal [[Class]] property is still `Object`, though:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
// Unlike a true array:
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call());
console.log('-----');
// although you can set the `toStringTag` to the string 'Array' in ES6+,
// it is cosmetic only and does not pass an `Array.isArray` test:
arrEmulation[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'Array';
console.log(Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation));
console.log(Array.isArray(arrEmulation));
edited 59 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
CertainPerformanceCertainPerformance
84.3k154169
84.3k154169
Thanks dude, this information gives me some more clarity to understand the differences between and standard object and an array. Just to you know, I'm not really looking to emulate an array with an object, but just to understand they differences and this helps me. +1!
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks dude, this information gives me some more clarity to understand the differences between and standard object and an array. Just to you know, I'm not really looking to emulate an array with an object, but just to understand they differences and this helps me. +1!
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
Thanks dude, this information gives me some more clarity to understand the differences between and standard object and an array. Just to you know, I'm not really looking to emulate an array with an object, but just to understand they differences and this helps me. +1!
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
Thanks dude, this information gives me some more clarity to understand the differences between and standard object and an array. Just to you know, I'm not really looking to emulate an array with an object, but just to understand they differences and this helps me. +1!
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Javascript is all about prototypal inheritance:
Prototype Inheritance
All JavaScript objects inherit properties and methods from a
prototype:
Date objects inherit from Date.prototype Array objects inherit from
Array.prototype Person objects inherit from Person.prototype The
Object.prototype is on the top of the prototype inheritance chain:
Date objects, Array objects, and Person objects inherit from
Object.prototype.
As seen here isArray is an function in prototype chain of the Array object.
An alternative as suggested in MDN Array.isArray() alternate if isArray is not present is:
if (!Array.isArray) {
Array.isArray = function(arg) {
return Object.prototype.toString.call(arg) === '[object Array]';
};
}
So the type is determined by the prototype chain instead of what value it returns.
Similarly, as per Tio Zed's answer
const newArray = Array.from(arrEmulation) // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Array.isArray(newArray)
What it really does is just change to prototype from that of object to that of an Array.
Hum... nope. That's not whatArray.isArray
checks. That is a simple polyfill posted on an MDN article, it is in no way how any browser will implement it. Here is what the specs asks though they're not clear as to how the check is made to know if it is an Array exotic Object. And here is a proof that it's not how it is implemented: jsfiddle.net/f6182mkh
– Kaiido
40 mins ago
I edited my answer I just wanted to show that it all depends on prototypes and not the keys they see in the value. BTW thanks for correcting me. Please edit my answer if you still feel something wrong with my answer. @Kaiido
– Black Mamba
34 mins ago
Well even the prototype thing is not correct either: jsfiddle.net/vLrgdp86
– Kaiido
30 mins ago
add a comment |
Javascript is all about prototypal inheritance:
Prototype Inheritance
All JavaScript objects inherit properties and methods from a
prototype:
Date objects inherit from Date.prototype Array objects inherit from
Array.prototype Person objects inherit from Person.prototype The
Object.prototype is on the top of the prototype inheritance chain:
Date objects, Array objects, and Person objects inherit from
Object.prototype.
As seen here isArray is an function in prototype chain of the Array object.
An alternative as suggested in MDN Array.isArray() alternate if isArray is not present is:
if (!Array.isArray) {
Array.isArray = function(arg) {
return Object.prototype.toString.call(arg) === '[object Array]';
};
}
So the type is determined by the prototype chain instead of what value it returns.
Similarly, as per Tio Zed's answer
const newArray = Array.from(arrEmulation) // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Array.isArray(newArray)
What it really does is just change to prototype from that of object to that of an Array.
Hum... nope. That's not whatArray.isArray
checks. That is a simple polyfill posted on an MDN article, it is in no way how any browser will implement it. Here is what the specs asks though they're not clear as to how the check is made to know if it is an Array exotic Object. And here is a proof that it's not how it is implemented: jsfiddle.net/f6182mkh
– Kaiido
40 mins ago
I edited my answer I just wanted to show that it all depends on prototypes and not the keys they see in the value. BTW thanks for correcting me. Please edit my answer if you still feel something wrong with my answer. @Kaiido
– Black Mamba
34 mins ago
Well even the prototype thing is not correct either: jsfiddle.net/vLrgdp86
– Kaiido
30 mins ago
add a comment |
Javascript is all about prototypal inheritance:
Prototype Inheritance
All JavaScript objects inherit properties and methods from a
prototype:
Date objects inherit from Date.prototype Array objects inherit from
Array.prototype Person objects inherit from Person.prototype The
Object.prototype is on the top of the prototype inheritance chain:
Date objects, Array objects, and Person objects inherit from
Object.prototype.
As seen here isArray is an function in prototype chain of the Array object.
An alternative as suggested in MDN Array.isArray() alternate if isArray is not present is:
if (!Array.isArray) {
Array.isArray = function(arg) {
return Object.prototype.toString.call(arg) === '[object Array]';
};
}
So the type is determined by the prototype chain instead of what value it returns.
Similarly, as per Tio Zed's answer
const newArray = Array.from(arrEmulation) // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Array.isArray(newArray)
What it really does is just change to prototype from that of object to that of an Array.
Javascript is all about prototypal inheritance:
Prototype Inheritance
All JavaScript objects inherit properties and methods from a
prototype:
Date objects inherit from Date.prototype Array objects inherit from
Array.prototype Person objects inherit from Person.prototype The
Object.prototype is on the top of the prototype inheritance chain:
Date objects, Array objects, and Person objects inherit from
Object.prototype.
As seen here isArray is an function in prototype chain of the Array object.
An alternative as suggested in MDN Array.isArray() alternate if isArray is not present is:
if (!Array.isArray) {
Array.isArray = function(arg) {
return Object.prototype.toString.call(arg) === '[object Array]';
};
}
So the type is determined by the prototype chain instead of what value it returns.
Similarly, as per Tio Zed's answer
const newArray = Array.from(arrEmulation) // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Array.isArray(newArray)
What it really does is just change to prototype from that of object to that of an Array.
edited 35 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
Black MambaBlack Mamba
2,76912139
2,76912139
Hum... nope. That's not whatArray.isArray
checks. That is a simple polyfill posted on an MDN article, it is in no way how any browser will implement it. Here is what the specs asks though they're not clear as to how the check is made to know if it is an Array exotic Object. And here is a proof that it's not how it is implemented: jsfiddle.net/f6182mkh
– Kaiido
40 mins ago
I edited my answer I just wanted to show that it all depends on prototypes and not the keys they see in the value. BTW thanks for correcting me. Please edit my answer if you still feel something wrong with my answer. @Kaiido
– Black Mamba
34 mins ago
Well even the prototype thing is not correct either: jsfiddle.net/vLrgdp86
– Kaiido
30 mins ago
add a comment |
Hum... nope. That's not whatArray.isArray
checks. That is a simple polyfill posted on an MDN article, it is in no way how any browser will implement it. Here is what the specs asks though they're not clear as to how the check is made to know if it is an Array exotic Object. And here is a proof that it's not how it is implemented: jsfiddle.net/f6182mkh
– Kaiido
40 mins ago
I edited my answer I just wanted to show that it all depends on prototypes and not the keys they see in the value. BTW thanks for correcting me. Please edit my answer if you still feel something wrong with my answer. @Kaiido
– Black Mamba
34 mins ago
Well even the prototype thing is not correct either: jsfiddle.net/vLrgdp86
– Kaiido
30 mins ago
Hum... nope. That's not what
Array.isArray
checks. That is a simple polyfill posted on an MDN article, it is in no way how any browser will implement it. Here is what the specs asks though they're not clear as to how the check is made to know if it is an Array exotic Object. And here is a proof that it's not how it is implemented: jsfiddle.net/f6182mkh– Kaiido
40 mins ago
Hum... nope. That's not what
Array.isArray
checks. That is a simple polyfill posted on an MDN article, it is in no way how any browser will implement it. Here is what the specs asks though they're not clear as to how the check is made to know if it is an Array exotic Object. And here is a proof that it's not how it is implemented: jsfiddle.net/f6182mkh– Kaiido
40 mins ago
I edited my answer I just wanted to show that it all depends on prototypes and not the keys they see in the value. BTW thanks for correcting me. Please edit my answer if you still feel something wrong with my answer. @Kaiido
– Black Mamba
34 mins ago
I edited my answer I just wanted to show that it all depends on prototypes and not the keys they see in the value. BTW thanks for correcting me. Please edit my answer if you still feel something wrong with my answer. @Kaiido
– Black Mamba
34 mins ago
Well even the prototype thing is not correct either: jsfiddle.net/vLrgdp86
– Kaiido
30 mins ago
Well even the prototype thing is not correct either: jsfiddle.net/vLrgdp86
– Kaiido
30 mins ago
add a comment |
You can convert anything that is close enough to an array by using Array.from().
In your example, we could just call:
const arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, 3:3, 4:4, 5:5, length: 6};
const newArray = Array.from(arrEmulation) // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Array.isArray(newArray) // true
1
I'm not looking at how to convert object to array, but to understand they differences...
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
1
@SmaGal, be fair - do you not say 'convert' in the question title?
– eric99
59 mins ago
@eric99 the down-vote don't come from me. I just explained that I was not looking for that.
– SmaGal
29 mins ago
@SmaGal my comment was a bit tongue-in-cheek. TioZed deserves some credit for his answer, given the question has now morphed into something more specific.
– eric99
23 mins ago
add a comment |
You can convert anything that is close enough to an array by using Array.from().
In your example, we could just call:
const arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, 3:3, 4:4, 5:5, length: 6};
const newArray = Array.from(arrEmulation) // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Array.isArray(newArray) // true
1
I'm not looking at how to convert object to array, but to understand they differences...
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
1
@SmaGal, be fair - do you not say 'convert' in the question title?
– eric99
59 mins ago
@eric99 the down-vote don't come from me. I just explained that I was not looking for that.
– SmaGal
29 mins ago
@SmaGal my comment was a bit tongue-in-cheek. TioZed deserves some credit for his answer, given the question has now morphed into something more specific.
– eric99
23 mins ago
add a comment |
You can convert anything that is close enough to an array by using Array.from().
In your example, we could just call:
const arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, 3:3, 4:4, 5:5, length: 6};
const newArray = Array.from(arrEmulation) // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Array.isArray(newArray) // true
You can convert anything that is close enough to an array by using Array.from().
In your example, we could just call:
const arrEmulation = {0:0, 1:1, 2:2, 3:3, 4:4, 5:5, length: 6};
const newArray = Array.from(arrEmulation) // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Array.isArray(newArray) // true
answered 1 hour ago
Tio ZedTio Zed
404
404
1
I'm not looking at how to convert object to array, but to understand they differences...
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
1
@SmaGal, be fair - do you not say 'convert' in the question title?
– eric99
59 mins ago
@eric99 the down-vote don't come from me. I just explained that I was not looking for that.
– SmaGal
29 mins ago
@SmaGal my comment was a bit tongue-in-cheek. TioZed deserves some credit for his answer, given the question has now morphed into something more specific.
– eric99
23 mins ago
add a comment |
1
I'm not looking at how to convert object to array, but to understand they differences...
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
1
@SmaGal, be fair - do you not say 'convert' in the question title?
– eric99
59 mins ago
@eric99 the down-vote don't come from me. I just explained that I was not looking for that.
– SmaGal
29 mins ago
@SmaGal my comment was a bit tongue-in-cheek. TioZed deserves some credit for his answer, given the question has now morphed into something more specific.
– eric99
23 mins ago
1
1
I'm not looking at how to convert object to array, but to understand they differences...
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
I'm not looking at how to convert object to array, but to understand they differences...
– SmaGal
1 hour ago
1
1
@SmaGal, be fair - do you not say 'convert' in the question title?
– eric99
59 mins ago
@SmaGal, be fair - do you not say 'convert' in the question title?
– eric99
59 mins ago
@eric99 the down-vote don't come from me. I just explained that I was not looking for that.
– SmaGal
29 mins ago
@eric99 the down-vote don't come from me. I just explained that I was not looking for that.
– SmaGal
29 mins ago
@SmaGal my comment was a bit tongue-in-cheek. TioZed deserves some credit for his answer, given the question has now morphed into something more specific.
– eric99
23 mins ago
@SmaGal my comment was a bit tongue-in-cheek. TioZed deserves some credit for his answer, given the question has now morphed into something more specific.
– eric99
23 mins ago
add a comment |
//converting object to array.
var person = {
name: 'manav',
age: '21'
}
var answer = function () {
return Object.keys(person).map(i => person[i])
}
console.log(answer());
simplest way to do it.
add a comment |
//converting object to array.
var person = {
name: 'manav',
age: '21'
}
var answer = function () {
return Object.keys(person).map(i => person[i])
}
console.log(answer());
simplest way to do it.
add a comment |
//converting object to array.
var person = {
name: 'manav',
age: '21'
}
var answer = function () {
return Object.keys(person).map(i => person[i])
}
console.log(answer());
simplest way to do it.
//converting object to array.
var person = {
name: 'manav',
age: '21'
}
var answer = function () {
return Object.keys(person).map(i => person[i])
}
console.log(answer());
simplest way to do it.
answered 41 mins ago
Manav KothariManav Kothari
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
SmaGal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
SmaGal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
SmaGal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
SmaGal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54527480%2fis-there-any-way-to-turn-an-existing-javascript-object-into-an-array-without-cre%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Possible duplicate of How to convert an Object {} to an Array of key-value pairs in JavaScript
– jmargolisvt
2 hours ago
7
I don't believe the suggested duplicate addresses this portion of OP's question: "I just want to understand which are those special things that make possible to interpret an object like an array." OP, perhaps this MIT article might be of use. It's the one referenced in MDN's own
isArray()
documentation... though I'm not sure it really hits the detail you're looking for.– Tyler Roper
2 hours ago
1
@jmargolisvt I don't want to know how to convert an object to array, I want to undesrtand what are the properties or keys that I need to add to an object so they are interpreted like an array.
– SmaGal
2 hours ago
@TylerRoper thanks, I'm going to give it a read...
– SmaGal
2 hours ago
1
Looking at the MDN polyfill (developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…) perhaps you can try getting
Object.prototype.toString.call(arrEmulation)
to return[object Array]
. I'm not sure what the definition of that function is though.– david
1 hour ago