error: implicit declaration of function ‘config_enabled’
When I try to run make
in Downloads/backports-20151120 on Debian, I get this error:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘config_enabled’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Make fails and says it is treating some warnings as errors.
Edit: following instructions on answer in this thread I can't connect to Wi-Fi, no wlan0 device on iwconfig
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Requested:
$ lspci -knn | grep Net -A3
02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter [168c:003e] (rev ff)
Kernel driver in use: ath10k_pci
Kernel modules: ath10k_pci
03:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL6540 Thunderbolt 3 Bridge (C step) [Alpine Ridge 4C 2016] [8086:15d3] (rev 02)
linux kernel-modules make
New contributor
|
show 5 more comments
When I try to run make
in Downloads/backports-20151120 on Debian, I get this error:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘config_enabled’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Make fails and says it is treating some warnings as errors.
Edit: following instructions on answer in this thread I can't connect to Wi-Fi, no wlan0 device on iwconfig
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Requested:
$ lspci -knn | grep Net -A3
02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter [168c:003e] (rev ff)
Kernel driver in use: ath10k_pci
Kernel modules: ath10k_pci
03:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL6540 Thunderbolt 3 Bridge (C step) [Alpine Ridge 4C 2016] [8086:15d3] (rev 02)
linux kernel-modules make
New contributor
1
But what is/backports-20151120
? Have you contacted whoever wrote whatever it is you are trying to compile?
– terdon♦
3 hours ago
1
The command claimed is not given anywhere in the instructions mentioned.
– JdeBP
3 hours ago
1
mod edited thinking he knew better its $ make within the backports folder
– Naish O'Loughlin
3 hours ago
1
@NaishO'Loughlin Well, to be fair, that's how I interpreted your initial question as well, so it was an honest attempt at cleaning up the markup.
– Kusalananda
2 hours ago
1
It strikes me that using code from 2015 with a newer kernel has all the potential for going wrong. I'm not a Linux user so I can't say much more than "try finding more up to date code".
– Kusalananda
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
When I try to run make
in Downloads/backports-20151120 on Debian, I get this error:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘config_enabled’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Make fails and says it is treating some warnings as errors.
Edit: following instructions on answer in this thread I can't connect to Wi-Fi, no wlan0 device on iwconfig
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Requested:
$ lspci -knn | grep Net -A3
02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter [168c:003e] (rev ff)
Kernel driver in use: ath10k_pci
Kernel modules: ath10k_pci
03:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL6540 Thunderbolt 3 Bridge (C step) [Alpine Ridge 4C 2016] [8086:15d3] (rev 02)
linux kernel-modules make
New contributor
When I try to run make
in Downloads/backports-20151120 on Debian, I get this error:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘config_enabled’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Make fails and says it is treating some warnings as errors.
Edit: following instructions on answer in this thread I can't connect to Wi-Fi, no wlan0 device on iwconfig
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Requested:
$ lspci -knn | grep Net -A3
02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter [168c:003e] (rev ff)
Kernel driver in use: ath10k_pci
Kernel modules: ath10k_pci
03:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL6540 Thunderbolt 3 Bridge (C step) [Alpine Ridge 4C 2016] [8086:15d3] (rev 02)
linux kernel-modules make
linux kernel-modules make
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
Kusalananda
135k17255420
135k17255420
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
Naish O'LoughlinNaish O'Loughlin
12
12
New contributor
New contributor
1
But what is/backports-20151120
? Have you contacted whoever wrote whatever it is you are trying to compile?
– terdon♦
3 hours ago
1
The command claimed is not given anywhere in the instructions mentioned.
– JdeBP
3 hours ago
1
mod edited thinking he knew better its $ make within the backports folder
– Naish O'Loughlin
3 hours ago
1
@NaishO'Loughlin Well, to be fair, that's how I interpreted your initial question as well, so it was an honest attempt at cleaning up the markup.
– Kusalananda
2 hours ago
1
It strikes me that using code from 2015 with a newer kernel has all the potential for going wrong. I'm not a Linux user so I can't say much more than "try finding more up to date code".
– Kusalananda
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
1
But what is/backports-20151120
? Have you contacted whoever wrote whatever it is you are trying to compile?
– terdon♦
3 hours ago
1
The command claimed is not given anywhere in the instructions mentioned.
– JdeBP
3 hours ago
1
mod edited thinking he knew better its $ make within the backports folder
– Naish O'Loughlin
3 hours ago
1
@NaishO'Loughlin Well, to be fair, that's how I interpreted your initial question as well, so it was an honest attempt at cleaning up the markup.
– Kusalananda
2 hours ago
1
It strikes me that using code from 2015 with a newer kernel has all the potential for going wrong. I'm not a Linux user so I can't say much more than "try finding more up to date code".
– Kusalananda
2 hours ago
1
1
But what is
/backports-20151120
? Have you contacted whoever wrote whatever it is you are trying to compile?– terdon♦
3 hours ago
But what is
/backports-20151120
? Have you contacted whoever wrote whatever it is you are trying to compile?– terdon♦
3 hours ago
1
1
The command claimed is not given anywhere in the instructions mentioned.
– JdeBP
3 hours ago
The command claimed is not given anywhere in the instructions mentioned.
– JdeBP
3 hours ago
1
1
mod edited thinking he knew better its $ make within the backports folder
– Naish O'Loughlin
3 hours ago
mod edited thinking he knew better its $ make within the backports folder
– Naish O'Loughlin
3 hours ago
1
1
@NaishO'Loughlin Well, to be fair, that's how I interpreted your initial question as well, so it was an honest attempt at cleaning up the markup.
– Kusalananda
2 hours ago
@NaishO'Loughlin Well, to be fair, that's how I interpreted your initial question as well, so it was an honest attempt at cleaning up the markup.
– Kusalananda
2 hours ago
1
1
It strikes me that using code from 2015 with a newer kernel has all the potential for going wrong. I'm not a Linux user so I can't say much more than "try finding more up to date code".
– Kusalananda
2 hours ago
It strikes me that using code from 2015 with a newer kernel has all the potential for going wrong. I'm not a Linux user so I can't say much more than "try finding more up to date code".
– Kusalananda
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Naish O'Loughlin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505686%2ferror-implicit-declaration-of-function-config-enabled%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Naish O'Loughlin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Naish O'Loughlin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Naish O'Loughlin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Naish O'Loughlin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505686%2ferror-implicit-declaration-of-function-config-enabled%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
But what is
/backports-20151120
? Have you contacted whoever wrote whatever it is you are trying to compile?– terdon♦
3 hours ago
1
The command claimed is not given anywhere in the instructions mentioned.
– JdeBP
3 hours ago
1
mod edited thinking he knew better its $ make within the backports folder
– Naish O'Loughlin
3 hours ago
1
@NaishO'Loughlin Well, to be fair, that's how I interpreted your initial question as well, so it was an honest attempt at cleaning up the markup.
– Kusalananda
2 hours ago
1
It strikes me that using code from 2015 with a newer kernel has all the potential for going wrong. I'm not a Linux user so I can't say much more than "try finding more up to date code".
– Kusalananda
2 hours ago