A question concerning the developing map of (G,X) manifolds












2












$begingroup$


Let $M$ be a $(G,X)$ manifold, that is we have local charts $(U,varphi_U)$ on $M$ with $varphi_U$ a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $X$ and the transition maps are locally-$G$.



Let $mathfrak{p}:widetilde{M}rightarrow M$ be the universal covering of $M$.



The developing map theorem introduces a local diffeomorphism $dev:widetilde{M}rightarrow X$.



Does the developing map locally commute with the (restricted) covering and local charts, i.e. for $widetilde{U}$ (small enough) $dev|_widetilde{U}=varphi_{U}circmathfrak{p}|_widetilde{U}$ for some $varphi_U$?






dg.differential-geometry







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    4 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$


Let $M$ be a $(G,X)$ manifold, that is we have local charts $(U,varphi_U)$ on $M$ with $varphi_U$ a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $X$ and the transition maps are locally-$G$.



Let $mathfrak{p}:widetilde{M}rightarrow M$ be the universal covering of $M$.



The developing map theorem introduces a local diffeomorphism $dev:widetilde{M}rightarrow X$.



Does the developing map locally commute with the (restricted) covering and local charts, i.e. for $widetilde{U}$ (small enough) $dev|_widetilde{U}=varphi_{U}circmathfrak{p}|_widetilde{U}$ for some $varphi_U$?






dg.differential-geometry







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    4 hours ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let $M$ be a $(G,X)$ manifold, that is we have local charts $(U,varphi_U)$ on $M$ with $varphi_U$ a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $X$ and the transition maps are locally-$G$.



Let $mathfrak{p}:widetilde{M}rightarrow M$ be the universal covering of $M$.



The developing map theorem introduces a local diffeomorphism $dev:widetilde{M}rightarrow X$.



Does the developing map locally commute with the (restricted) covering and local charts, i.e. for $widetilde{U}$ (small enough) $dev|_widetilde{U}=varphi_{U}circmathfrak{p}|_widetilde{U}$ for some $varphi_U$?






dg.differential-geometry







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Let $M$ be a $(G,X)$ manifold, that is we have local charts $(U,varphi_U)$ on $M$ with $varphi_U$ a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $X$ and the transition maps are locally-$G$.



Let $mathfrak{p}:widetilde{M}rightarrow M$ be the universal covering of $M$.



The developing map theorem introduces a local diffeomorphism $dev:widetilde{M}rightarrow X$.



Does the developing map locally commute with the (restricted) covering and local charts, i.e. for $widetilde{U}$ (small enough) $dev|_widetilde{U}=varphi_{U}circmathfrak{p}|_widetilde{U}$ for some $varphi_U$?






dg.differential-geometry




dg.differential-geometry






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









user135350user135350

111




111




New contributor




user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user135350 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    4 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    4 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
$endgroup$
– YCor
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
It's hard to make sense of the question (the last sentence). What's "small enough $tilde{U}$"? what's "for some $varphi_U$" when $varphi_U$ is already introduced?
$endgroup$
– YCor
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.



To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:



$D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.



This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f322330%2fa-question-concerning-the-developing-map-of-g-x-manifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
    The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.



    To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:



    $D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.



    This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
      The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.



      To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:



      $D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.



      This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
        The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.



        To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:



        $D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.



        This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The best way to see this is to read the proof of the existence of the developing map.
        The $(X,G)$ structure on $M$ induces an $(X,G)$-structure on $tilde M$ its universal cover such that for any $tilde xin tilde M$, write $x=p(tilde x)$ where $p$ is the covering map. Consider a chart $xin U$ such that there exists $tilde U$ which contains $tilde x$ such that the restriction of $p$ to $tilde U$, $p_{tilde U}:tilde Urightarrow U$ is an homeomorphism $phi_{tilde U}=phi_Ucirc p_{tilde U}$.



        To construct the developing map, one fixes $tilde x_0in tilde M$ for every $tilde xin hat M$, one considers a path $c:[0,1]rightarrow hat M$ such that $c(0)=tilde x_0$ and $c(1)=tilde x$, then one consider chart $(tilde U_0,tilde phi_0),...(tilde U_n,tildephi_n)$ such that there exists a subdivision $[0=t_0,t_1,...,t_n=1]$ such that $c[t_i,t_{i+1}]subset tilde U_i$ and one sets:



        $D(tilde x)=tilde g_0...g_{n-1}tildephi_n(tilde x)$ where $g_iin G$ such that $tilde phi_icirc{tildephi_{i+1}}^{-1}$ is the restriction of $g_i$ to $tildephi_{i+1}(tilde U_{i+1})$.



        This shows that if we set $U_n=p(tilde U_n)$, we can define the chart $(U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}phi_n)$ of $x$ and the chart $(tilde U_n,g_0...g_{n-1}tilde phi_n)$ which answer your question.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 4 hours ago

























        answered 4 hours ago









        Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide

        2,6621616




        2,6621616






















            user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            user135350 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f322330%2fa-question-concerning-the-developing-map-of-g-x-manifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Loup dans la culture

            Image
            Loups sur une enluminure du Bestiaire d'Aberdeen Le loup est l'animal le plus emblématique de l'histoire de l'Eurasie, il était à l'honneur durant l'Antiquité chez la totalité des anciens peuples européens [ 1 ] . Sommaire 1 Le loup dans la mythologie 2 Les loups dans le folklore 2.1 L'évolution des mentalités 2.2 Le loup dans la psychanalyse 3 Le loup dans les œuvres culturelles 3.1 Le loup dans la littérature 3.1.1 Fables 3.1.2 Poésie 3.1.3 Romans 3.1.4 Littérature jeunesse 3.1.4.1 Quelques titres d'albums contemporains 3.1.5 Bande dessinée 3.2 Le loup à l'écran 3.2.1 Le cinéma et la télévision 3.2.2 Documentaires 3.2.3 Dessins animés 3.2.4 Jeux vidéo 3.3 Le loup en peinture et en sculpture 3.4 Le loup dans les œuvres musicales 4 Le loup et les noms propres 5 Bibliographie 6 Notes et références 7 Voir aussi 7.1 Articles connexes
            Read more

            How to solve the problem of ntp “Unable to contact time server” from KDE?

            Image
            1 0 I want to set date and time automatically but this error appears when I try to .. I'm using openSUSE, I tried different servers but it didn't work either, help please! It doesn't seem to be a network problem: $ ping pool.ntp.org 64 bytes from 41.78.128.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=41 time=260 ms To the question of whether ntpd is installed and running: $ ps -C ntpd PID TTY TIME CMD i.e. there's no ntpd process running. $ rpm -qa | grep ntp yast2-ntp-client-3.1.12-1.7.noarch ntp-4.2.6p5-25.2.1.i586 Further information from the comments: $ sudo ntpdate pool.ntp.org 25 Sep 19:41:51 ntpdate[3162]: no server suitable for synchronization found networking kde opensuse ntp ntpd sh
            Read more

            ASUS Zenbook UX433/UX333 — Configure Touchpad-embedded numpad on Linux

            Image
            0 1 I have an ASUS Zenbook UX433,on which ASUS decided to innovate by embedding a Numpad inside the touchpad (see picture 1). Toggling between classic touchpad mode and numpad (also turns the touchpad LEDs on) can be done through the golden button in the top-right corner of the touchpad. However, on my Manjaro arch Linux config, this behavior does not work by default and I can only use the touchpad, no numpad. Has anyone been able to configure the numpad to work on Linux, or have any idea how this could be achieved? EDIT1: I have had a look at the official Windows drivers for the UX433FA TouchPad, but was not able to make anything of it. I tried installing them on Linux using tools like NDISWrapper, but they do not detect the TouchPad/Numpad hardware, and my understanding of drivers is too limited.
            Read more