Difference between `nmap local-IP-address` and `nmap localhost`












4















The following IP address is for my network interface



$ nmap 192.168.0.142

Starting Nmap 7.60 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2019-03-09 11:33 EST
Nmap scan report for ocean (192.168.0.142)
Host is up (0.00047s latency).
Not shown: 996 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
22/tcp open ssh
80/tcp open http
111/tcp open rpcbind
3306/tcp open mysql

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.97 seconds


Are those services shown below but not above exactly those that are closed to the outside but open within my local machine?



Are the services whose security that I should worry about exactly those listed above?



Thanks.



$ nmap localhost

Starting Nmap 7.60 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2019-03-09 11:34 EST
Nmap scan report for localhost (127.0.0.1)
Host is up (0.00046s latency).
Other addresses for localhost (not scanned):
Not shown: 993 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
22/tcp open ssh
80/tcp open http
111/tcp open rpcbind
631/tcp open ipp
3306/tcp open mysql
5432/tcp open postgresql
9050/tcp open tor-socks

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.16 seconds









share|improve this question



























    4















    The following IP address is for my network interface



    $ nmap 192.168.0.142

    Starting Nmap 7.60 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2019-03-09 11:33 EST
    Nmap scan report for ocean (192.168.0.142)
    Host is up (0.00047s latency).
    Not shown: 996 closed ports
    PORT STATE SERVICE
    22/tcp open ssh
    80/tcp open http
    111/tcp open rpcbind
    3306/tcp open mysql

    Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.97 seconds


    Are those services shown below but not above exactly those that are closed to the outside but open within my local machine?



    Are the services whose security that I should worry about exactly those listed above?



    Thanks.



    $ nmap localhost

    Starting Nmap 7.60 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2019-03-09 11:34 EST
    Nmap scan report for localhost (127.0.0.1)
    Host is up (0.00046s latency).
    Other addresses for localhost (not scanned):
    Not shown: 993 closed ports
    PORT STATE SERVICE
    22/tcp open ssh
    80/tcp open http
    111/tcp open rpcbind
    631/tcp open ipp
    3306/tcp open mysql
    5432/tcp open postgresql
    9050/tcp open tor-socks

    Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.16 seconds









    share|improve this question

























      4












      4








      4








      The following IP address is for my network interface



      $ nmap 192.168.0.142

      Starting Nmap 7.60 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2019-03-09 11:33 EST
      Nmap scan report for ocean (192.168.0.142)
      Host is up (0.00047s latency).
      Not shown: 996 closed ports
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      22/tcp open ssh
      80/tcp open http
      111/tcp open rpcbind
      3306/tcp open mysql

      Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.97 seconds


      Are those services shown below but not above exactly those that are closed to the outside but open within my local machine?



      Are the services whose security that I should worry about exactly those listed above?



      Thanks.



      $ nmap localhost

      Starting Nmap 7.60 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2019-03-09 11:34 EST
      Nmap scan report for localhost (127.0.0.1)
      Host is up (0.00046s latency).
      Other addresses for localhost (not scanned):
      Not shown: 993 closed ports
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      22/tcp open ssh
      80/tcp open http
      111/tcp open rpcbind
      631/tcp open ipp
      3306/tcp open mysql
      5432/tcp open postgresql
      9050/tcp open tor-socks

      Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.16 seconds









      share|improve this question














      The following IP address is for my network interface



      $ nmap 192.168.0.142

      Starting Nmap 7.60 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2019-03-09 11:33 EST
      Nmap scan report for ocean (192.168.0.142)
      Host is up (0.00047s latency).
      Not shown: 996 closed ports
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      22/tcp open ssh
      80/tcp open http
      111/tcp open rpcbind
      3306/tcp open mysql

      Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.97 seconds


      Are those services shown below but not above exactly those that are closed to the outside but open within my local machine?



      Are the services whose security that I should worry about exactly those listed above?



      Thanks.



      $ nmap localhost

      Starting Nmap 7.60 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2019-03-09 11:34 EST
      Nmap scan report for localhost (127.0.0.1)
      Host is up (0.00046s latency).
      Other addresses for localhost (not scanned):
      Not shown: 993 closed ports
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      22/tcp open ssh
      80/tcp open http
      111/tcp open rpcbind
      631/tcp open ipp
      3306/tcp open mysql
      5432/tcp open postgresql
      9050/tcp open tor-socks

      Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.16 seconds






      services nmap






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 10 hours ago









      TimTim

      27.5k78264476




      27.5k78264476






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          If you have services that are only bound to the localhost/127.0.0.1 address, they will only show in a 127.0.0.1 nmap scan, and not in others scans to IP addresses on the same host.



          Such is the case usually, for security reasons, of binding to 127.0.0.1, MySQL, postgresql and mongo DBs for only localhost use, redis and others.



          Conversely, you can find sometimes other ports on non-localhost IPs, especially when you have vhosts in webservers bound to non-localhost IP addresses, and to only listen on those addresses.



          On your specific 192.168.0.142 case, I would enquire wether that MySQL could not also be bound to 127.0.0.1.



          PS A very old adage that I was taught when as a trainee, was: "More important than using the tools, is understanding how they work/the data we are given."



          Concerning @roaima answer, as an example mentioned on this answer, the default port of a widely used DB, mongodb, is not on the list of ports scanned by default by nmap.



          TLDR It is not a rule that scanning different IP addresses of the same equipment, that all the scanning data/open ports will be the same.



          Alas, by network design most often than not, we do not want them to be the same. For instance in firewalls/switching equipment, we define interfaces/VLANs on a specific control network that users cannot reach for having the web management/ssh services active, and only on those interfaces. e.g. normal users cannot reach those services, they can only be reached by a VPN and/or a control room. (this is a more extreme example. I have worked in organisations where the SSH service of VMs is only present via a control network too).






          share|improve this answer


























          • And even if the same port is open on different interfaces, it may not be the same service. I.e. port 443 on a public-facing interface may run your public website, 443 on an internal-facing interface may run the Git server that you use to deploy your website.

            – Jörg W Mittag
            9 hours ago











          • @JörgWMittag Good point.

            – Rui F Ribeiro
            9 hours ago



















          3














          Almost, but not quite.



          By default nmap scans only 1000 ports for any given protocol (tcp, udp, whatever). So your port scans are subject to that filter. You'll see from the documentation that you can define the set of ports to be scanned with the -p option, and that -p- means scan ports 1-65535. (Strangely, out 0 is still omitted; you have to specify it explicitly if you want to include it.)






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks. Does -p0,1-65535 scan all possible ports (for any given protocol (tcp, udp, whatever))?

            – Tim
            10 hours ago













          • The documentation I linked in my answer shows -p0- is sufficient.

            – roaima
            3 hours ago





















          3














          Also, you appear to only have scanned TCP and not UDP :-). So there might also be UDP services you want to worry about.



          UDP scanning has some issues that do not apply to TCP scanning. In either case, I would start by querying the OS instead: How do I list all sockets which are open to remote machines?



          Port scanning is still useful as a confirmation though. Port scanning from a different host is a particularly good idea if you have set up a firewall, to confirm that the firewall is doing what you want.






          share|improve this answer


























          • And then the IPsec services ;) the possibilities, my God :) .... +1 (I am joking with serious things. Many people want true and tried recipes for some activities, and the reality is that were wont be a unique way of doing that for two different networks)

            – Rui F Ribeiro
            9 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505335%2fdifference-between-nmap-local-ip-address-and-nmap-localhost%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          If you have services that are only bound to the localhost/127.0.0.1 address, they will only show in a 127.0.0.1 nmap scan, and not in others scans to IP addresses on the same host.



          Such is the case usually, for security reasons, of binding to 127.0.0.1, MySQL, postgresql and mongo DBs for only localhost use, redis and others.



          Conversely, you can find sometimes other ports on non-localhost IPs, especially when you have vhosts in webservers bound to non-localhost IP addresses, and to only listen on those addresses.



          On your specific 192.168.0.142 case, I would enquire wether that MySQL could not also be bound to 127.0.0.1.



          PS A very old adage that I was taught when as a trainee, was: "More important than using the tools, is understanding how they work/the data we are given."



          Concerning @roaima answer, as an example mentioned on this answer, the default port of a widely used DB, mongodb, is not on the list of ports scanned by default by nmap.



          TLDR It is not a rule that scanning different IP addresses of the same equipment, that all the scanning data/open ports will be the same.



          Alas, by network design most often than not, we do not want them to be the same. For instance in firewalls/switching equipment, we define interfaces/VLANs on a specific control network that users cannot reach for having the web management/ssh services active, and only on those interfaces. e.g. normal users cannot reach those services, they can only be reached by a VPN and/or a control room. (this is a more extreme example. I have worked in organisations where the SSH service of VMs is only present via a control network too).






          share|improve this answer


























          • And even if the same port is open on different interfaces, it may not be the same service. I.e. port 443 on a public-facing interface may run your public website, 443 on an internal-facing interface may run the Git server that you use to deploy your website.

            – Jörg W Mittag
            9 hours ago











          • @JörgWMittag Good point.

            – Rui F Ribeiro
            9 hours ago
















          4














          If you have services that are only bound to the localhost/127.0.0.1 address, they will only show in a 127.0.0.1 nmap scan, and not in others scans to IP addresses on the same host.



          Such is the case usually, for security reasons, of binding to 127.0.0.1, MySQL, postgresql and mongo DBs for only localhost use, redis and others.



          Conversely, you can find sometimes other ports on non-localhost IPs, especially when you have vhosts in webservers bound to non-localhost IP addresses, and to only listen on those addresses.



          On your specific 192.168.0.142 case, I would enquire wether that MySQL could not also be bound to 127.0.0.1.



          PS A very old adage that I was taught when as a trainee, was: "More important than using the tools, is understanding how they work/the data we are given."



          Concerning @roaima answer, as an example mentioned on this answer, the default port of a widely used DB, mongodb, is not on the list of ports scanned by default by nmap.



          TLDR It is not a rule that scanning different IP addresses of the same equipment, that all the scanning data/open ports will be the same.



          Alas, by network design most often than not, we do not want them to be the same. For instance in firewalls/switching equipment, we define interfaces/VLANs on a specific control network that users cannot reach for having the web management/ssh services active, and only on those interfaces. e.g. normal users cannot reach those services, they can only be reached by a VPN and/or a control room. (this is a more extreme example. I have worked in organisations where the SSH service of VMs is only present via a control network too).






          share|improve this answer


























          • And even if the same port is open on different interfaces, it may not be the same service. I.e. port 443 on a public-facing interface may run your public website, 443 on an internal-facing interface may run the Git server that you use to deploy your website.

            – Jörg W Mittag
            9 hours ago











          • @JörgWMittag Good point.

            – Rui F Ribeiro
            9 hours ago














          4












          4








          4







          If you have services that are only bound to the localhost/127.0.0.1 address, they will only show in a 127.0.0.1 nmap scan, and not in others scans to IP addresses on the same host.



          Such is the case usually, for security reasons, of binding to 127.0.0.1, MySQL, postgresql and mongo DBs for only localhost use, redis and others.



          Conversely, you can find sometimes other ports on non-localhost IPs, especially when you have vhosts in webservers bound to non-localhost IP addresses, and to only listen on those addresses.



          On your specific 192.168.0.142 case, I would enquire wether that MySQL could not also be bound to 127.0.0.1.



          PS A very old adage that I was taught when as a trainee, was: "More important than using the tools, is understanding how they work/the data we are given."



          Concerning @roaima answer, as an example mentioned on this answer, the default port of a widely used DB, mongodb, is not on the list of ports scanned by default by nmap.



          TLDR It is not a rule that scanning different IP addresses of the same equipment, that all the scanning data/open ports will be the same.



          Alas, by network design most often than not, we do not want them to be the same. For instance in firewalls/switching equipment, we define interfaces/VLANs on a specific control network that users cannot reach for having the web management/ssh services active, and only on those interfaces. e.g. normal users cannot reach those services, they can only be reached by a VPN and/or a control room. (this is a more extreme example. I have worked in organisations where the SSH service of VMs is only present via a control network too).






          share|improve this answer















          If you have services that are only bound to the localhost/127.0.0.1 address, they will only show in a 127.0.0.1 nmap scan, and not in others scans to IP addresses on the same host.



          Such is the case usually, for security reasons, of binding to 127.0.0.1, MySQL, postgresql and mongo DBs for only localhost use, redis and others.



          Conversely, you can find sometimes other ports on non-localhost IPs, especially when you have vhosts in webservers bound to non-localhost IP addresses, and to only listen on those addresses.



          On your specific 192.168.0.142 case, I would enquire wether that MySQL could not also be bound to 127.0.0.1.



          PS A very old adage that I was taught when as a trainee, was: "More important than using the tools, is understanding how they work/the data we are given."



          Concerning @roaima answer, as an example mentioned on this answer, the default port of a widely used DB, mongodb, is not on the list of ports scanned by default by nmap.



          TLDR It is not a rule that scanning different IP addresses of the same equipment, that all the scanning data/open ports will be the same.



          Alas, by network design most often than not, we do not want them to be the same. For instance in firewalls/switching equipment, we define interfaces/VLANs on a specific control network that users cannot reach for having the web management/ssh services active, and only on those interfaces. e.g. normal users cannot reach those services, they can only be reached by a VPN and/or a control room. (this is a more extreme example. I have worked in organisations where the SSH service of VMs is only present via a control network too).







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 9 hours ago

























          answered 10 hours ago









          Rui F RibeiroRui F Ribeiro

          41.3k1481140




          41.3k1481140













          • And even if the same port is open on different interfaces, it may not be the same service. I.e. port 443 on a public-facing interface may run your public website, 443 on an internal-facing interface may run the Git server that you use to deploy your website.

            – Jörg W Mittag
            9 hours ago











          • @JörgWMittag Good point.

            – Rui F Ribeiro
            9 hours ago



















          • And even if the same port is open on different interfaces, it may not be the same service. I.e. port 443 on a public-facing interface may run your public website, 443 on an internal-facing interface may run the Git server that you use to deploy your website.

            – Jörg W Mittag
            9 hours ago











          • @JörgWMittag Good point.

            – Rui F Ribeiro
            9 hours ago

















          And even if the same port is open on different interfaces, it may not be the same service. I.e. port 443 on a public-facing interface may run your public website, 443 on an internal-facing interface may run the Git server that you use to deploy your website.

          – Jörg W Mittag
          9 hours ago





          And even if the same port is open on different interfaces, it may not be the same service. I.e. port 443 on a public-facing interface may run your public website, 443 on an internal-facing interface may run the Git server that you use to deploy your website.

          – Jörg W Mittag
          9 hours ago













          @JörgWMittag Good point.

          – Rui F Ribeiro
          9 hours ago





          @JörgWMittag Good point.

          – Rui F Ribeiro
          9 hours ago













          3














          Almost, but not quite.



          By default nmap scans only 1000 ports for any given protocol (tcp, udp, whatever). So your port scans are subject to that filter. You'll see from the documentation that you can define the set of ports to be scanned with the -p option, and that -p- means scan ports 1-65535. (Strangely, out 0 is still omitted; you have to specify it explicitly if you want to include it.)






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks. Does -p0,1-65535 scan all possible ports (for any given protocol (tcp, udp, whatever))?

            – Tim
            10 hours ago













          • The documentation I linked in my answer shows -p0- is sufficient.

            – roaima
            3 hours ago


















          3














          Almost, but not quite.



          By default nmap scans only 1000 ports for any given protocol (tcp, udp, whatever). So your port scans are subject to that filter. You'll see from the documentation that you can define the set of ports to be scanned with the -p option, and that -p- means scan ports 1-65535. (Strangely, out 0 is still omitted; you have to specify it explicitly if you want to include it.)






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks. Does -p0,1-65535 scan all possible ports (for any given protocol (tcp, udp, whatever))?

            – Tim
            10 hours ago













          • The documentation I linked in my answer shows -p0- is sufficient.

            – roaima
            3 hours ago
















          3












          3








          3







          Almost, but not quite.



          By default nmap scans only 1000 ports for any given protocol (tcp, udp, whatever). So your port scans are subject to that filter. You'll see from the documentation that you can define the set of ports to be scanned with the -p option, and that -p- means scan ports 1-65535. (Strangely, out 0 is still omitted; you have to specify it explicitly if you want to include it.)






          share|improve this answer













          Almost, but not quite.



          By default nmap scans only 1000 ports for any given protocol (tcp, udp, whatever). So your port scans are subject to that filter. You'll see from the documentation that you can define the set of ports to be scanned with the -p option, and that -p- means scan ports 1-65535. (Strangely, out 0 is still omitted; you have to specify it explicitly if you want to include it.)







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 10 hours ago









          roaimaroaima

          45.4k757123




          45.4k757123













          • Thanks. Does -p0,1-65535 scan all possible ports (for any given protocol (tcp, udp, whatever))?

            – Tim
            10 hours ago













          • The documentation I linked in my answer shows -p0- is sufficient.

            – roaima
            3 hours ago





















          • Thanks. Does -p0,1-65535 scan all possible ports (for any given protocol (tcp, udp, whatever))?

            – Tim
            10 hours ago













          • The documentation I linked in my answer shows -p0- is sufficient.

            – roaima
            3 hours ago



















          Thanks. Does -p0,1-65535 scan all possible ports (for any given protocol (tcp, udp, whatever))?

          – Tim
          10 hours ago







          Thanks. Does -p0,1-65535 scan all possible ports (for any given protocol (tcp, udp, whatever))?

          – Tim
          10 hours ago















          The documentation I linked in my answer shows -p0- is sufficient.

          – roaima
          3 hours ago







          The documentation I linked in my answer shows -p0- is sufficient.

          – roaima
          3 hours ago













          3














          Also, you appear to only have scanned TCP and not UDP :-). So there might also be UDP services you want to worry about.



          UDP scanning has some issues that do not apply to TCP scanning. In either case, I would start by querying the OS instead: How do I list all sockets which are open to remote machines?



          Port scanning is still useful as a confirmation though. Port scanning from a different host is a particularly good idea if you have set up a firewall, to confirm that the firewall is doing what you want.






          share|improve this answer


























          • And then the IPsec services ;) the possibilities, my God :) .... +1 (I am joking with serious things. Many people want true and tried recipes for some activities, and the reality is that were wont be a unique way of doing that for two different networks)

            – Rui F Ribeiro
            9 hours ago


















          3














          Also, you appear to only have scanned TCP and not UDP :-). So there might also be UDP services you want to worry about.



          UDP scanning has some issues that do not apply to TCP scanning. In either case, I would start by querying the OS instead: How do I list all sockets which are open to remote machines?



          Port scanning is still useful as a confirmation though. Port scanning from a different host is a particularly good idea if you have set up a firewall, to confirm that the firewall is doing what you want.






          share|improve this answer


























          • And then the IPsec services ;) the possibilities, my God :) .... +1 (I am joking with serious things. Many people want true and tried recipes for some activities, and the reality is that were wont be a unique way of doing that for two different networks)

            – Rui F Ribeiro
            9 hours ago
















          3












          3








          3







          Also, you appear to only have scanned TCP and not UDP :-). So there might also be UDP services you want to worry about.



          UDP scanning has some issues that do not apply to TCP scanning. In either case, I would start by querying the OS instead: How do I list all sockets which are open to remote machines?



          Port scanning is still useful as a confirmation though. Port scanning from a different host is a particularly good idea if you have set up a firewall, to confirm that the firewall is doing what you want.






          share|improve this answer















          Also, you appear to only have scanned TCP and not UDP :-). So there might also be UDP services you want to worry about.



          UDP scanning has some issues that do not apply to TCP scanning. In either case, I would start by querying the OS instead: How do I list all sockets which are open to remote machines?



          Port scanning is still useful as a confirmation though. Port scanning from a different host is a particularly good idea if you have set up a firewall, to confirm that the firewall is doing what you want.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 8 hours ago

























          answered 9 hours ago









          sourcejedisourcejedi

          24.9k441107




          24.9k441107













          • And then the IPsec services ;) the possibilities, my God :) .... +1 (I am joking with serious things. Many people want true and tried recipes for some activities, and the reality is that were wont be a unique way of doing that for two different networks)

            – Rui F Ribeiro
            9 hours ago





















          • And then the IPsec services ;) the possibilities, my God :) .... +1 (I am joking with serious things. Many people want true and tried recipes for some activities, and the reality is that were wont be a unique way of doing that for two different networks)

            – Rui F Ribeiro
            9 hours ago



















          And then the IPsec services ;) the possibilities, my God :) .... +1 (I am joking with serious things. Many people want true and tried recipes for some activities, and the reality is that were wont be a unique way of doing that for two different networks)

          – Rui F Ribeiro
          9 hours ago







          And then the IPsec services ;) the possibilities, my God :) .... +1 (I am joking with serious things. Many people want true and tried recipes for some activities, and the reality is that were wont be a unique way of doing that for two different networks)

          – Rui F Ribeiro
          9 hours ago




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505335%2fdifference-between-nmap-local-ip-address-and-nmap-localhost%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Loup dans la culture

          How to solve the problem of ntp “Unable to contact time server” from KDE?

          ASUS Zenbook UX433/UX333 — Configure Touchpad-embedded numpad on Linux