Clara went back in time to save all the Doctors
If Clara went back in time to save all the Doctor's past incarnations through Trenzalore's TARDIS, why doesn't Matt Smith's Doctor recognise her when they first meet from all of their past encounters across time and space?
doctor-who time-travel
New contributor
add a comment |
If Clara went back in time to save all the Doctor's past incarnations through Trenzalore's TARDIS, why doesn't Matt Smith's Doctor recognise her when they first meet from all of their past encounters across time and space?
doctor-who time-travel
New contributor
5
Because retcons don't actually ripple backwards in time
– Valorum
8 hours ago
4
Because wibbly wobbly timey wimey.
– Mike Scott
8 hours ago
add a comment |
If Clara went back in time to save all the Doctor's past incarnations through Trenzalore's TARDIS, why doesn't Matt Smith's Doctor recognise her when they first meet from all of their past encounters across time and space?
doctor-who time-travel
New contributor
If Clara went back in time to save all the Doctor's past incarnations through Trenzalore's TARDIS, why doesn't Matt Smith's Doctor recognise her when they first meet from all of their past encounters across time and space?
doctor-who time-travel
doctor-who time-travel
New contributor
New contributor
edited 6 hours ago
Nemon27
1,267421
1,267421
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
Rebecca JeromeRebecca Jerome
512
512
New contributor
New contributor
5
Because retcons don't actually ripple backwards in time
– Valorum
8 hours ago
4
Because wibbly wobbly timey wimey.
– Mike Scott
8 hours ago
add a comment |
5
Because retcons don't actually ripple backwards in time
– Valorum
8 hours ago
4
Because wibbly wobbly timey wimey.
– Mike Scott
8 hours ago
5
5
Because retcons don't actually ripple backwards in time
– Valorum
8 hours ago
Because retcons don't actually ripple backwards in time
– Valorum
8 hours ago
4
4
Because wibbly wobbly timey wimey.
– Mike Scott
8 hours ago
Because wibbly wobbly timey wimey.
– Mike Scott
8 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The usual reason that the current Doctor doesn't remember some events that have happened to past Doctors is to do with time streams. This is the excuse used when a current Doctor event directly interferes with a past Doctor event. For example, the Doctor doesn't remember
he saved Gallifrey rather than destroy it
until the events responsible for that were present in his time stream. From the TV episode The Day of the Doctor
WARRIOR: I won't remember this, will I?
DOCTOR: The time streams are out of sync. You can't retain it, no.
WARRIOR: So I won't remember that I tried to save Gallifrey rather than burn it. I'll have to live with that. But for now, for this moment, I am the Doctor again. Thank you.
Only the Doctor performing actions responsible for altering their own past can retain memories of those events.
The events that lead up to Clara going back to save his past incarnations, and the Doctor recognising her, begin with Asylum of the Daleks or there abouts (he realises who she is in The Snowmen). As such, even though he had met her previously (it's shown that he met her face to face while stealing the TARDIS), he doesn't remember her because she isn't in the time stream of events that leads to her entering his past until 11's tenure as the Doctor.
Presumably, the Doctor now does remember all of the times Clara had saved him/her in the past and that he/she met her, as the time streams have lined up now. Until that point when the time streams synched up though, any memory of her couldn't be retained.
add a comment |
From "The Name of The Doctor", in the montage that shows Clara saving several past Doctors:
CLARA [Narration]: I just know I'm running. Sometimes it's like I've lived a thousand lives in a thousand places. I'm born, I live, I die. And always, there's the Doctor. Always I'm running to save the Doctor again and again and again. Oi! And he hardly ever hears me. But I've always been there.
As I understood, Clara always saved the Doctor in his/her past incarnations, but kind of in a "behind the scenes" way. He hardly ever heard her, or saw her. In said montage, Clara was retconned with not very well done effects in past instances when The Doctor was in mortal danger, making it look like she saved him all along, without the Doctor knowing.
We see the first time he turns to see her is in "The Snowmen", and the Eleventh Doctor didn't even make the connection until he saw her grave saying Clara Oswin Oswald.
Oswin Oswald was the girl in the Dalek Asylum, and the Doctor never even saw her, he just heard her voice. That's when he finally put 2 and 2 together and set to solve the mistery of the "Impossible Girl", putting the time loop into motion.
add a comment |
The disconnect is between "she went back in time to save the Doctor" and "the Doctor had past encounters with her". The second does not actually follow from the first: she could have saved him without him ever seeing her, at least not to remember. A close analogy from real life would be EMT's/emergency room doctors: most people whose lives they save wouldn't give them a second look if they met in the grocery store.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Rebecca Jerome is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203689%2fclara-went-back-in-time-to-save-all-the-doctors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The usual reason that the current Doctor doesn't remember some events that have happened to past Doctors is to do with time streams. This is the excuse used when a current Doctor event directly interferes with a past Doctor event. For example, the Doctor doesn't remember
he saved Gallifrey rather than destroy it
until the events responsible for that were present in his time stream. From the TV episode The Day of the Doctor
WARRIOR: I won't remember this, will I?
DOCTOR: The time streams are out of sync. You can't retain it, no.
WARRIOR: So I won't remember that I tried to save Gallifrey rather than burn it. I'll have to live with that. But for now, for this moment, I am the Doctor again. Thank you.
Only the Doctor performing actions responsible for altering their own past can retain memories of those events.
The events that lead up to Clara going back to save his past incarnations, and the Doctor recognising her, begin with Asylum of the Daleks or there abouts (he realises who she is in The Snowmen). As such, even though he had met her previously (it's shown that he met her face to face while stealing the TARDIS), he doesn't remember her because she isn't in the time stream of events that leads to her entering his past until 11's tenure as the Doctor.
Presumably, the Doctor now does remember all of the times Clara had saved him/her in the past and that he/she met her, as the time streams have lined up now. Until that point when the time streams synched up though, any memory of her couldn't be retained.
add a comment |
The usual reason that the current Doctor doesn't remember some events that have happened to past Doctors is to do with time streams. This is the excuse used when a current Doctor event directly interferes with a past Doctor event. For example, the Doctor doesn't remember
he saved Gallifrey rather than destroy it
until the events responsible for that were present in his time stream. From the TV episode The Day of the Doctor
WARRIOR: I won't remember this, will I?
DOCTOR: The time streams are out of sync. You can't retain it, no.
WARRIOR: So I won't remember that I tried to save Gallifrey rather than burn it. I'll have to live with that. But for now, for this moment, I am the Doctor again. Thank you.
Only the Doctor performing actions responsible for altering their own past can retain memories of those events.
The events that lead up to Clara going back to save his past incarnations, and the Doctor recognising her, begin with Asylum of the Daleks or there abouts (he realises who she is in The Snowmen). As such, even though he had met her previously (it's shown that he met her face to face while stealing the TARDIS), he doesn't remember her because she isn't in the time stream of events that leads to her entering his past until 11's tenure as the Doctor.
Presumably, the Doctor now does remember all of the times Clara had saved him/her in the past and that he/she met her, as the time streams have lined up now. Until that point when the time streams synched up though, any memory of her couldn't be retained.
add a comment |
The usual reason that the current Doctor doesn't remember some events that have happened to past Doctors is to do with time streams. This is the excuse used when a current Doctor event directly interferes with a past Doctor event. For example, the Doctor doesn't remember
he saved Gallifrey rather than destroy it
until the events responsible for that were present in his time stream. From the TV episode The Day of the Doctor
WARRIOR: I won't remember this, will I?
DOCTOR: The time streams are out of sync. You can't retain it, no.
WARRIOR: So I won't remember that I tried to save Gallifrey rather than burn it. I'll have to live with that. But for now, for this moment, I am the Doctor again. Thank you.
Only the Doctor performing actions responsible for altering their own past can retain memories of those events.
The events that lead up to Clara going back to save his past incarnations, and the Doctor recognising her, begin with Asylum of the Daleks or there abouts (he realises who she is in The Snowmen). As such, even though he had met her previously (it's shown that he met her face to face while stealing the TARDIS), he doesn't remember her because she isn't in the time stream of events that leads to her entering his past until 11's tenure as the Doctor.
Presumably, the Doctor now does remember all of the times Clara had saved him/her in the past and that he/she met her, as the time streams have lined up now. Until that point when the time streams synched up though, any memory of her couldn't be retained.
The usual reason that the current Doctor doesn't remember some events that have happened to past Doctors is to do with time streams. This is the excuse used when a current Doctor event directly interferes with a past Doctor event. For example, the Doctor doesn't remember
he saved Gallifrey rather than destroy it
until the events responsible for that were present in his time stream. From the TV episode The Day of the Doctor
WARRIOR: I won't remember this, will I?
DOCTOR: The time streams are out of sync. You can't retain it, no.
WARRIOR: So I won't remember that I tried to save Gallifrey rather than burn it. I'll have to live with that. But for now, for this moment, I am the Doctor again. Thank you.
Only the Doctor performing actions responsible for altering their own past can retain memories of those events.
The events that lead up to Clara going back to save his past incarnations, and the Doctor recognising her, begin with Asylum of the Daleks or there abouts (he realises who she is in The Snowmen). As such, even though he had met her previously (it's shown that he met her face to face while stealing the TARDIS), he doesn't remember her because she isn't in the time stream of events that leads to her entering his past until 11's tenure as the Doctor.
Presumably, the Doctor now does remember all of the times Clara had saved him/her in the past and that he/she met her, as the time streams have lined up now. Until that point when the time streams synched up though, any memory of her couldn't be retained.
edited 6 hours ago
Rand al'Thor♦
96.6k41461643
96.6k41461643
answered 7 hours ago
Nemon27Nemon27
1,267421
1,267421
add a comment |
add a comment |
From "The Name of The Doctor", in the montage that shows Clara saving several past Doctors:
CLARA [Narration]: I just know I'm running. Sometimes it's like I've lived a thousand lives in a thousand places. I'm born, I live, I die. And always, there's the Doctor. Always I'm running to save the Doctor again and again and again. Oi! And he hardly ever hears me. But I've always been there.
As I understood, Clara always saved the Doctor in his/her past incarnations, but kind of in a "behind the scenes" way. He hardly ever heard her, or saw her. In said montage, Clara was retconned with not very well done effects in past instances when The Doctor was in mortal danger, making it look like she saved him all along, without the Doctor knowing.
We see the first time he turns to see her is in "The Snowmen", and the Eleventh Doctor didn't even make the connection until he saw her grave saying Clara Oswin Oswald.
Oswin Oswald was the girl in the Dalek Asylum, and the Doctor never even saw her, he just heard her voice. That's when he finally put 2 and 2 together and set to solve the mistery of the "Impossible Girl", putting the time loop into motion.
add a comment |
From "The Name of The Doctor", in the montage that shows Clara saving several past Doctors:
CLARA [Narration]: I just know I'm running. Sometimes it's like I've lived a thousand lives in a thousand places. I'm born, I live, I die. And always, there's the Doctor. Always I'm running to save the Doctor again and again and again. Oi! And he hardly ever hears me. But I've always been there.
As I understood, Clara always saved the Doctor in his/her past incarnations, but kind of in a "behind the scenes" way. He hardly ever heard her, or saw her. In said montage, Clara was retconned with not very well done effects in past instances when The Doctor was in mortal danger, making it look like she saved him all along, without the Doctor knowing.
We see the first time he turns to see her is in "The Snowmen", and the Eleventh Doctor didn't even make the connection until he saw her grave saying Clara Oswin Oswald.
Oswin Oswald was the girl in the Dalek Asylum, and the Doctor never even saw her, he just heard her voice. That's when he finally put 2 and 2 together and set to solve the mistery of the "Impossible Girl", putting the time loop into motion.
add a comment |
From "The Name of The Doctor", in the montage that shows Clara saving several past Doctors:
CLARA [Narration]: I just know I'm running. Sometimes it's like I've lived a thousand lives in a thousand places. I'm born, I live, I die. And always, there's the Doctor. Always I'm running to save the Doctor again and again and again. Oi! And he hardly ever hears me. But I've always been there.
As I understood, Clara always saved the Doctor in his/her past incarnations, but kind of in a "behind the scenes" way. He hardly ever heard her, or saw her. In said montage, Clara was retconned with not very well done effects in past instances when The Doctor was in mortal danger, making it look like she saved him all along, without the Doctor knowing.
We see the first time he turns to see her is in "The Snowmen", and the Eleventh Doctor didn't even make the connection until he saw her grave saying Clara Oswin Oswald.
Oswin Oswald was the girl in the Dalek Asylum, and the Doctor never even saw her, he just heard her voice. That's when he finally put 2 and 2 together and set to solve the mistery of the "Impossible Girl", putting the time loop into motion.
From "The Name of The Doctor", in the montage that shows Clara saving several past Doctors:
CLARA [Narration]: I just know I'm running. Sometimes it's like I've lived a thousand lives in a thousand places. I'm born, I live, I die. And always, there's the Doctor. Always I'm running to save the Doctor again and again and again. Oi! And he hardly ever hears me. But I've always been there.
As I understood, Clara always saved the Doctor in his/her past incarnations, but kind of in a "behind the scenes" way. He hardly ever heard her, or saw her. In said montage, Clara was retconned with not very well done effects in past instances when The Doctor was in mortal danger, making it look like she saved him all along, without the Doctor knowing.
We see the first time he turns to see her is in "The Snowmen", and the Eleventh Doctor didn't even make the connection until he saw her grave saying Clara Oswin Oswald.
Oswin Oswald was the girl in the Dalek Asylum, and the Doctor never even saw her, he just heard her voice. That's when he finally put 2 and 2 together and set to solve the mistery of the "Impossible Girl", putting the time loop into motion.
answered 6 hours ago
tilley31tilley31
4,51912249
4,51912249
add a comment |
add a comment |
The disconnect is between "she went back in time to save the Doctor" and "the Doctor had past encounters with her". The second does not actually follow from the first: she could have saved him without him ever seeing her, at least not to remember. A close analogy from real life would be EMT's/emergency room doctors: most people whose lives they save wouldn't give them a second look if they met in the grocery store.
add a comment |
The disconnect is between "she went back in time to save the Doctor" and "the Doctor had past encounters with her". The second does not actually follow from the first: she could have saved him without him ever seeing her, at least not to remember. A close analogy from real life would be EMT's/emergency room doctors: most people whose lives they save wouldn't give them a second look if they met in the grocery store.
add a comment |
The disconnect is between "she went back in time to save the Doctor" and "the Doctor had past encounters with her". The second does not actually follow from the first: she could have saved him without him ever seeing her, at least not to remember. A close analogy from real life would be EMT's/emergency room doctors: most people whose lives they save wouldn't give them a second look if they met in the grocery store.
The disconnect is between "she went back in time to save the Doctor" and "the Doctor had past encounters with her". The second does not actually follow from the first: she could have saved him without him ever seeing her, at least not to remember. A close analogy from real life would be EMT's/emergency room doctors: most people whose lives they save wouldn't give them a second look if they met in the grocery store.
answered 8 hours ago
MarthaMartha
11k64585
11k64585
add a comment |
add a comment |
Rebecca Jerome is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rebecca Jerome is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rebecca Jerome is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rebecca Jerome is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203689%2fclara-went-back-in-time-to-save-all-the-doctors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
Because retcons don't actually ripple backwards in time
– Valorum
8 hours ago
4
Because wibbly wobbly timey wimey.
– Mike Scott
8 hours ago