Arch ufw enabling
1
To enable UFW in Debian I do:
ufw --force enable
I understand from the Arch documentation that do so in Arch I should do instead:
systemctl start ufw
systemctl enable ufw
By "enabling" I mean "Ensuring UFW will run after each system boot".
Is my way of doing so in Arch totally resembles the way to do so in Debian?
arch-linux ufw
asked 6 hours ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
add a comment |
1
To enable UFW in Debian I do:
ufw --force enable
I understand from the Arch documentation that do so in Arch I should do instead:
systemctl start ufw
systemctl enable ufw
By "enabling" I mean "Ensuring UFW will run after each system boot".
Is my way of doing so in Arch totally resembles the way to do so in Debian?
arch-linux ufw
asked 6 hours ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
"The next line is only needed once the first time you install the package:# ufw enable" wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Uncomplicated_Firewall
– sourcejedi
6 hours ago
Why not use iptables? UFW is just a way to make iptables simpler and uses more overhead, I know the increase is really unnoticeable. Yet, I get more throughput with just iptables than with UFW. It is a small difference, but it is there.
– Michael Prokopec
7 mins ago
add a comment |
1
1
1
To enable UFW in Debian I do:
ufw --force enable
I understand from the Arch documentation that do so in Arch I should do instead:
systemctl start ufw
systemctl enable ufw
By "enabling" I mean "Ensuring UFW will run after each system boot".
Is my way of doing so in Arch totally resembles the way to do so in Debian?
arch-linux ufw
asked 6 hours ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
To enable UFW in Debian I do:
ufw --force enable
I understand from the Arch documentation that do so in Arch I should do instead:
systemctl start ufw
systemctl enable ufw
By "enabling" I mean "Ensuring UFW will run after each system boot".
Is my way of doing so in Arch totally resembles the way to do so in Debian?
arch-linux ufw
arch-linux ufw
asked 6 hours ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
asked 6 hours ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
asked 6 hours ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
asked 6 hours ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
asked 6 hours ago
JohnDoeaJohnDoea
931132
931132
"The next line is only needed once the first time you install the package:# ufw enable" wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Uncomplicated_Firewall
– sourcejedi
6 hours ago
Why not use iptables? UFW is just a way to make iptables simpler and uses more overhead, I know the increase is really unnoticeable. Yet, I get more throughput with just iptables than with UFW. It is a small difference, but it is there.
– Michael Prokopec
7 mins ago
add a comment |
"The next line is only needed once the first time you install the package:# ufw enable" wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Uncomplicated_Firewall
– sourcejedi
6 hours ago
Why not use iptables? UFW is just a way to make iptables simpler and uses more overhead, I know the increase is really unnoticeable. Yet, I get more throughput with just iptables than with UFW. It is a small difference, but it is there.
– Michael Prokopec
7 mins ago
"The next line is only needed once the first time you install the package:
# ufw enable" wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Uncomplicated_Firewall– sourcejedi
6 hours ago
"The next line is only needed once the first time you install the package:
# ufw enable" wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Uncomplicated_Firewall– sourcejedi
6 hours ago
Why not use iptables? UFW is just a way to make iptables simpler and uses more overhead, I know the increase is really unnoticeable. Yet, I get more throughput with just iptables than with UFW. It is a small difference, but it is there.
– Michael Prokopec
7 mins ago
Why not use iptables? UFW is just a way to make iptables simpler and uses more overhead, I know the increase is really unnoticeable. Yet, I get more throughput with just iptables than with UFW. It is a small difference, but it is there.
– Michael Prokopec
7 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
0
It's simply ufw enable - after enabling the service.
answered 6 hours ago
Ashley PrimoAshley Primo
11
New contributor
Ashley Primo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f495355%2farch-ufw-enabling%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
0
It's simply ufw enable - after enabling the service.
answered 6 hours ago
Ashley PrimoAshley Primo
11
New contributor
Ashley Primo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
0
It's simply ufw enable - after enabling the service.
answered 6 hours ago
Ashley PrimoAshley Primo
11
New contributor
Ashley Primo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
0
0
0
It's simply ufw enable - after enabling the service.
answered 6 hours ago
Ashley PrimoAshley Primo
11
New contributor
Ashley Primo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
It's simply ufw enable - after enabling the service.
answered 6 hours ago
Ashley PrimoAshley Primo
11
New contributor
Ashley Primo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 6 hours ago
Ashley PrimoAshley Primo
11
New contributor
Ashley Primo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 6 hours ago
Ashley PrimoAshley Primo
11
answered 6 hours ago
Ashley PrimoAshley Primo
11
11
New contributor
Ashley Primo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Ashley Primo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Ashley Primo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f495355%2farch-ufw-enabling%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
"The next line is only needed once the first time you install the package:
# ufw enable" wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Uncomplicated_Firewall– sourcejedi
6 hours ago
Why not use iptables? UFW is just a way to make iptables simpler and uses more overhead, I know the increase is really unnoticeable. Yet, I get more throughput with just iptables than with UFW. It is a small difference, but it is there.
– Michael Prokopec
7 mins ago