Make awk produce error on non-numeric












4















I have a program that sums a column in a file:



awk -v col=2 '{sum+=$col}END{print sum}' input-file


However, it has a problem: If you give it a file that doesn't have numeric data, (or if one number is missing) it will interpret it as zero.



I want it to produce an error if one of the fields cannot be parsed as a number.



Here's an example input:



bob 1
dave 2
alice 3.5
foo bar


I want it to produce an error because 'bar' is not a number, rather than ignoring the error.










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    If not a dupe, at least strongly related: Can I determine type of an awk variable?

    – Kusalananda
    21 hours ago











  • by "produce an error", do you mean stop altogether, or skip the line, and/or emit a message?

    – Jeff Schaller
    21 hours ago











  • Stop altogether and emit a message.

    – Nick ODell
    21 hours ago











  • @Kusalananda Thanks, that was really helpful.

    – Nick ODell
    20 hours ago
















4















I have a program that sums a column in a file:



awk -v col=2 '{sum+=$col}END{print sum}' input-file


However, it has a problem: If you give it a file that doesn't have numeric data, (or if one number is missing) it will interpret it as zero.



I want it to produce an error if one of the fields cannot be parsed as a number.



Here's an example input:



bob 1
dave 2
alice 3.5
foo bar


I want it to produce an error because 'bar' is not a number, rather than ignoring the error.










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    If not a dupe, at least strongly related: Can I determine type of an awk variable?

    – Kusalananda
    21 hours ago











  • by "produce an error", do you mean stop altogether, or skip the line, and/or emit a message?

    – Jeff Schaller
    21 hours ago











  • Stop altogether and emit a message.

    – Nick ODell
    21 hours ago











  • @Kusalananda Thanks, that was really helpful.

    – Nick ODell
    20 hours ago














4












4








4








I have a program that sums a column in a file:



awk -v col=2 '{sum+=$col}END{print sum}' input-file


However, it has a problem: If you give it a file that doesn't have numeric data, (or if one number is missing) it will interpret it as zero.



I want it to produce an error if one of the fields cannot be parsed as a number.



Here's an example input:



bob 1
dave 2
alice 3.5
foo bar


I want it to produce an error because 'bar' is not a number, rather than ignoring the error.










share|improve this question














I have a program that sums a column in a file:



awk -v col=2 '{sum+=$col}END{print sum}' input-file


However, it has a problem: If you give it a file that doesn't have numeric data, (or if one number is missing) it will interpret it as zero.



I want it to produce an error if one of the fields cannot be parsed as a number.



Here's an example input:



bob 1
dave 2
alice 3.5
foo bar


I want it to produce an error because 'bar' is not a number, rather than ignoring the error.







awk numeric-data






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 21 hours ago









Nick ODellNick ODell

1,0492920




1,0492920








  • 2





    If not a dupe, at least strongly related: Can I determine type of an awk variable?

    – Kusalananda
    21 hours ago











  • by "produce an error", do you mean stop altogether, or skip the line, and/or emit a message?

    – Jeff Schaller
    21 hours ago











  • Stop altogether and emit a message.

    – Nick ODell
    21 hours ago











  • @Kusalananda Thanks, that was really helpful.

    – Nick ODell
    20 hours ago














  • 2





    If not a dupe, at least strongly related: Can I determine type of an awk variable?

    – Kusalananda
    21 hours ago











  • by "produce an error", do you mean stop altogether, or skip the line, and/or emit a message?

    – Jeff Schaller
    21 hours ago











  • Stop altogether and emit a message.

    – Nick ODell
    21 hours ago











  • @Kusalananda Thanks, that was really helpful.

    – Nick ODell
    20 hours ago








2




2





If not a dupe, at least strongly related: Can I determine type of an awk variable?

– Kusalananda
21 hours ago





If not a dupe, at least strongly related: Can I determine type of an awk variable?

– Kusalananda
21 hours ago













by "produce an error", do you mean stop altogether, or skip the line, and/or emit a message?

– Jeff Schaller
21 hours ago





by "produce an error", do you mean stop altogether, or skip the line, and/or emit a message?

– Jeff Schaller
21 hours ago













Stop altogether and emit a message.

– Nick ODell
21 hours ago





Stop altogether and emit a message.

– Nick ODell
21 hours ago













@Kusalananda Thanks, that was really helpful.

– Nick ODell
20 hours ago





@Kusalananda Thanks, that was really helpful.

– Nick ODell
20 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















7














A reasonable way to test would be to compare the field using tests similar to strtod, which is the method that awk uses to convert strings to numbers:



$2 !~ / *[+-]?[[:digit:]]/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


The above differs from strtod in that it does not consider INFINITY or NAN to be "numbers". The leading space requirement could be relaxed under awk's default field-splitting behavior -- meaning the fields would never contain leading space:



$2 !~ /[+-]?[[:digit:]]/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


A further refinement, thanks to Stéphane's comment and answer here:



$2 !~ /^[+-]?([[:digit:]]*.?[[:digit:]]*([eE][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?|0[xX][[:xdigit:]]*.?[[:xdigit:]]*([pP][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?)$/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


Broken out for slightly better legibility, that regex is:



/^[+-]?([[:digit:]]*.?[[:digit:]]*([eE][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?|
0[xX][[:xdigit:]]*.?[[:xdigit:]]*([pP][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?)$/


... where the intention is to allow a possible leading + or -, then either a floating point number or hexadecimal number. The floating point number has optional leading digits, an option separator (here fixed to be a period .), followed by some number of digits, optionally followed by an exponent. The hex number must start with 0x or 0X, followed by hex digits, a separator, more hex digits, and optionally followed by a "power" (exponent). The entire second field must match one of those formats (as anchored by ^ and $). Omitted here, for the purposes of this question, are the NAN and INFINITY options.



Another option would be to force a numeric conversion, then compare it to zero and then further compare the original input to something that would convert to zero; more specifically, does it start with an optional + or -, then is it followed by zeros, or followed by a period and zeros:



{ number=0 + $2;
if (!number && $2 !~ /^[+-]?(0+)|.0+/)
print "NAN: "$2;
}





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    You'd need to anchor the regexp (with ^), otherwise, it's just a test whether the second field contains a decimal digit. You'd also need to take care of numbers like .123. There's also whether you want to honour user's decimal radix (comma vs period). The last one would let strings like ., +, +.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    16 hours ago











  • Great points, Stéphane; thank you. I will correct the simpler aspects shortly.

    – Jeff Schaller
    14 hours ago











  • notice that when converting strings to numbers awk will ignore any trailing junk (see my answer) and /^[+-]?0*.?0*$/ is far from being a thorough pattern matching strings that will be completely parsed to 0 by strtod (what about 0e13, .0e-0, 0x0, 0x.0p+13, etc?)

    – Uncle Billy
    12 hours ago













  • Point well taken, @UncleBilly, as also noted by Stéphane above. I'm working on the "zero" regex right now...

    – Jeff Schaller
    12 hours ago



















5














I ended up with this:



awk -v col=$col '
typeof($col) != "strnum" {
print "Error on line " NR ": " $col " is not numeric"
noprint=1
exit 1
}
{
sum+=$col
}
END {
if(!noprint)
print sum
}' $file


This uses typeof, which is a GNU awk extension. typeof($col) returns 'strnum' if $col is a valid number, and 'string' or 'unassigned' if it is not.



See Can I determine type of an awk variable?






share|improve this answer































    1















    If you give it a file that doesn't have numeric data,




    $col ~ /[^-.[:digit:]]/ {print "Error, non-numeric :"; print $col; exit 1};


    Explanation just use a RegEx to check for the presence of characters which are not digits nor floating point, sign, etc.




    (or if one number is missing)




    add



    || ($col == "")


    or



    || (length($col) == 0)


    to the rule.



    Or you could use a comparison to NF if it's the last column like in your example.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    DrYak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




























      1














      awk -v col=2 '
      $col+0==0 && $col!~/^[+-]?0/ { print "bad number " $col > "/dev/stderr" }
      {sum+=$col}
      END{print sum}' input-file


      It's up to you to complicate it if you want it to also handle .0 or .0e+33 as valid representations of 0; notice that awk will ignore trailing junk when converting strings to numbers ("1.4e1e3"+0, "1.4e1.e7"+0 or "14+13"+0 will be all equal to 14).






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "106"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494889%2fmake-awk-produce-error-on-non-numeric%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        7














        A reasonable way to test would be to compare the field using tests similar to strtod, which is the method that awk uses to convert strings to numbers:



        $2 !~ / *[+-]?[[:digit:]]/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


        The above differs from strtod in that it does not consider INFINITY or NAN to be "numbers". The leading space requirement could be relaxed under awk's default field-splitting behavior -- meaning the fields would never contain leading space:



        $2 !~ /[+-]?[[:digit:]]/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


        A further refinement, thanks to Stéphane's comment and answer here:



        $2 !~ /^[+-]?([[:digit:]]*.?[[:digit:]]*([eE][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?|0[xX][[:xdigit:]]*.?[[:xdigit:]]*([pP][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?)$/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


        Broken out for slightly better legibility, that regex is:



        /^[+-]?([[:digit:]]*.?[[:digit:]]*([eE][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?|
        0[xX][[:xdigit:]]*.?[[:xdigit:]]*([pP][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?)$/


        ... where the intention is to allow a possible leading + or -, then either a floating point number or hexadecimal number. The floating point number has optional leading digits, an option separator (here fixed to be a period .), followed by some number of digits, optionally followed by an exponent. The hex number must start with 0x or 0X, followed by hex digits, a separator, more hex digits, and optionally followed by a "power" (exponent). The entire second field must match one of those formats (as anchored by ^ and $). Omitted here, for the purposes of this question, are the NAN and INFINITY options.



        Another option would be to force a numeric conversion, then compare it to zero and then further compare the original input to something that would convert to zero; more specifically, does it start with an optional + or -, then is it followed by zeros, or followed by a period and zeros:



        { number=0 + $2;
        if (!number && $2 !~ /^[+-]?(0+)|.0+/)
        print "NAN: "$2;
        }





        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          You'd need to anchor the regexp (with ^), otherwise, it's just a test whether the second field contains a decimal digit. You'd also need to take care of numbers like .123. There's also whether you want to honour user's decimal radix (comma vs period). The last one would let strings like ., +, +.

          – Stéphane Chazelas
          16 hours ago











        • Great points, Stéphane; thank you. I will correct the simpler aspects shortly.

          – Jeff Schaller
          14 hours ago











        • notice that when converting strings to numbers awk will ignore any trailing junk (see my answer) and /^[+-]?0*.?0*$/ is far from being a thorough pattern matching strings that will be completely parsed to 0 by strtod (what about 0e13, .0e-0, 0x0, 0x.0p+13, etc?)

          – Uncle Billy
          12 hours ago













        • Point well taken, @UncleBilly, as also noted by Stéphane above. I'm working on the "zero" regex right now...

          – Jeff Schaller
          12 hours ago
















        7














        A reasonable way to test would be to compare the field using tests similar to strtod, which is the method that awk uses to convert strings to numbers:



        $2 !~ / *[+-]?[[:digit:]]/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


        The above differs from strtod in that it does not consider INFINITY or NAN to be "numbers". The leading space requirement could be relaxed under awk's default field-splitting behavior -- meaning the fields would never contain leading space:



        $2 !~ /[+-]?[[:digit:]]/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


        A further refinement, thanks to Stéphane's comment and answer here:



        $2 !~ /^[+-]?([[:digit:]]*.?[[:digit:]]*([eE][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?|0[xX][[:xdigit:]]*.?[[:xdigit:]]*([pP][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?)$/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


        Broken out for slightly better legibility, that regex is:



        /^[+-]?([[:digit:]]*.?[[:digit:]]*([eE][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?|
        0[xX][[:xdigit:]]*.?[[:xdigit:]]*([pP][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?)$/


        ... where the intention is to allow a possible leading + or -, then either a floating point number or hexadecimal number. The floating point number has optional leading digits, an option separator (here fixed to be a period .), followed by some number of digits, optionally followed by an exponent. The hex number must start with 0x or 0X, followed by hex digits, a separator, more hex digits, and optionally followed by a "power" (exponent). The entire second field must match one of those formats (as anchored by ^ and $). Omitted here, for the purposes of this question, are the NAN and INFINITY options.



        Another option would be to force a numeric conversion, then compare it to zero and then further compare the original input to something that would convert to zero; more specifically, does it start with an optional + or -, then is it followed by zeros, or followed by a period and zeros:



        { number=0 + $2;
        if (!number && $2 !~ /^[+-]?(0+)|.0+/)
        print "NAN: "$2;
        }





        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          You'd need to anchor the regexp (with ^), otherwise, it's just a test whether the second field contains a decimal digit. You'd also need to take care of numbers like .123. There's also whether you want to honour user's decimal radix (comma vs period). The last one would let strings like ., +, +.

          – Stéphane Chazelas
          16 hours ago











        • Great points, Stéphane; thank you. I will correct the simpler aspects shortly.

          – Jeff Schaller
          14 hours ago











        • notice that when converting strings to numbers awk will ignore any trailing junk (see my answer) and /^[+-]?0*.?0*$/ is far from being a thorough pattern matching strings that will be completely parsed to 0 by strtod (what about 0e13, .0e-0, 0x0, 0x.0p+13, etc?)

          – Uncle Billy
          12 hours ago













        • Point well taken, @UncleBilly, as also noted by Stéphane above. I'm working on the "zero" regex right now...

          – Jeff Schaller
          12 hours ago














        7












        7








        7







        A reasonable way to test would be to compare the field using tests similar to strtod, which is the method that awk uses to convert strings to numbers:



        $2 !~ / *[+-]?[[:digit:]]/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


        The above differs from strtod in that it does not consider INFINITY or NAN to be "numbers". The leading space requirement could be relaxed under awk's default field-splitting behavior -- meaning the fields would never contain leading space:



        $2 !~ /[+-]?[[:digit:]]/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


        A further refinement, thanks to Stéphane's comment and answer here:



        $2 !~ /^[+-]?([[:digit:]]*.?[[:digit:]]*([eE][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?|0[xX][[:xdigit:]]*.?[[:xdigit:]]*([pP][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?)$/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


        Broken out for slightly better legibility, that regex is:



        /^[+-]?([[:digit:]]*.?[[:digit:]]*([eE][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?|
        0[xX][[:xdigit:]]*.?[[:xdigit:]]*([pP][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?)$/


        ... where the intention is to allow a possible leading + or -, then either a floating point number or hexadecimal number. The floating point number has optional leading digits, an option separator (here fixed to be a period .), followed by some number of digits, optionally followed by an exponent. The hex number must start with 0x or 0X, followed by hex digits, a separator, more hex digits, and optionally followed by a "power" (exponent). The entire second field must match one of those formats (as anchored by ^ and $). Omitted here, for the purposes of this question, are the NAN and INFINITY options.



        Another option would be to force a numeric conversion, then compare it to zero and then further compare the original input to something that would convert to zero; more specifically, does it start with an optional + or -, then is it followed by zeros, or followed by a period and zeros:



        { number=0 + $2;
        if (!number && $2 !~ /^[+-]?(0+)|.0+/)
        print "NAN: "$2;
        }





        share|improve this answer















        A reasonable way to test would be to compare the field using tests similar to strtod, which is the method that awk uses to convert strings to numbers:



        $2 !~ / *[+-]?[[:digit:]]/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


        The above differs from strtod in that it does not consider INFINITY or NAN to be "numbers". The leading space requirement could be relaxed under awk's default field-splitting behavior -- meaning the fields would never contain leading space:



        $2 !~ /[+-]?[[:digit:]]/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


        A further refinement, thanks to Stéphane's comment and answer here:



        $2 !~ /^[+-]?([[:digit:]]*.?[[:digit:]]*([eE][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?|0[xX][[:xdigit:]]*.?[[:xdigit:]]*([pP][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?)$/ { print "NAN: " $2; exit 1; }


        Broken out for slightly better legibility, that regex is:



        /^[+-]?([[:digit:]]*.?[[:digit:]]*([eE][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?|
        0[xX][[:xdigit:]]*.?[[:xdigit:]]*([pP][-+]?[[:digit:]]+)?)$/


        ... where the intention is to allow a possible leading + or -, then either a floating point number or hexadecimal number. The floating point number has optional leading digits, an option separator (here fixed to be a period .), followed by some number of digits, optionally followed by an exponent. The hex number must start with 0x or 0X, followed by hex digits, a separator, more hex digits, and optionally followed by a "power" (exponent). The entire second field must match one of those formats (as anchored by ^ and $). Omitted here, for the purposes of this question, are the NAN and INFINITY options.



        Another option would be to force a numeric conversion, then compare it to zero and then further compare the original input to something that would convert to zero; more specifically, does it start with an optional + or -, then is it followed by zeros, or followed by a period and zeros:



        { number=0 + $2;
        if (!number && $2 !~ /^[+-]?(0+)|.0+/)
        print "NAN: "$2;
        }






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 12 hours ago

























        answered 21 hours ago









        Jeff SchallerJeff Schaller

        39.4k1054125




        39.4k1054125








        • 1





          You'd need to anchor the regexp (with ^), otherwise, it's just a test whether the second field contains a decimal digit. You'd also need to take care of numbers like .123. There's also whether you want to honour user's decimal radix (comma vs period). The last one would let strings like ., +, +.

          – Stéphane Chazelas
          16 hours ago











        • Great points, Stéphane; thank you. I will correct the simpler aspects shortly.

          – Jeff Schaller
          14 hours ago











        • notice that when converting strings to numbers awk will ignore any trailing junk (see my answer) and /^[+-]?0*.?0*$/ is far from being a thorough pattern matching strings that will be completely parsed to 0 by strtod (what about 0e13, .0e-0, 0x0, 0x.0p+13, etc?)

          – Uncle Billy
          12 hours ago













        • Point well taken, @UncleBilly, as also noted by Stéphane above. I'm working on the "zero" regex right now...

          – Jeff Schaller
          12 hours ago














        • 1





          You'd need to anchor the regexp (with ^), otherwise, it's just a test whether the second field contains a decimal digit. You'd also need to take care of numbers like .123. There's also whether you want to honour user's decimal radix (comma vs period). The last one would let strings like ., +, +.

          – Stéphane Chazelas
          16 hours ago











        • Great points, Stéphane; thank you. I will correct the simpler aspects shortly.

          – Jeff Schaller
          14 hours ago











        • notice that when converting strings to numbers awk will ignore any trailing junk (see my answer) and /^[+-]?0*.?0*$/ is far from being a thorough pattern matching strings that will be completely parsed to 0 by strtod (what about 0e13, .0e-0, 0x0, 0x.0p+13, etc?)

          – Uncle Billy
          12 hours ago













        • Point well taken, @UncleBilly, as also noted by Stéphane above. I'm working on the "zero" regex right now...

          – Jeff Schaller
          12 hours ago








        1




        1





        You'd need to anchor the regexp (with ^), otherwise, it's just a test whether the second field contains a decimal digit. You'd also need to take care of numbers like .123. There's also whether you want to honour user's decimal radix (comma vs period). The last one would let strings like ., +, +.

        – Stéphane Chazelas
        16 hours ago





        You'd need to anchor the regexp (with ^), otherwise, it's just a test whether the second field contains a decimal digit. You'd also need to take care of numbers like .123. There's also whether you want to honour user's decimal radix (comma vs period). The last one would let strings like ., +, +.

        – Stéphane Chazelas
        16 hours ago













        Great points, Stéphane; thank you. I will correct the simpler aspects shortly.

        – Jeff Schaller
        14 hours ago





        Great points, Stéphane; thank you. I will correct the simpler aspects shortly.

        – Jeff Schaller
        14 hours ago













        notice that when converting strings to numbers awk will ignore any trailing junk (see my answer) and /^[+-]?0*.?0*$/ is far from being a thorough pattern matching strings that will be completely parsed to 0 by strtod (what about 0e13, .0e-0, 0x0, 0x.0p+13, etc?)

        – Uncle Billy
        12 hours ago







        notice that when converting strings to numbers awk will ignore any trailing junk (see my answer) and /^[+-]?0*.?0*$/ is far from being a thorough pattern matching strings that will be completely parsed to 0 by strtod (what about 0e13, .0e-0, 0x0, 0x.0p+13, etc?)

        – Uncle Billy
        12 hours ago















        Point well taken, @UncleBilly, as also noted by Stéphane above. I'm working on the "zero" regex right now...

        – Jeff Schaller
        12 hours ago





        Point well taken, @UncleBilly, as also noted by Stéphane above. I'm working on the "zero" regex right now...

        – Jeff Schaller
        12 hours ago













        5














        I ended up with this:



        awk -v col=$col '
        typeof($col) != "strnum" {
        print "Error on line " NR ": " $col " is not numeric"
        noprint=1
        exit 1
        }
        {
        sum+=$col
        }
        END {
        if(!noprint)
        print sum
        }' $file


        This uses typeof, which is a GNU awk extension. typeof($col) returns 'strnum' if $col is a valid number, and 'string' or 'unassigned' if it is not.



        See Can I determine type of an awk variable?






        share|improve this answer




























          5














          I ended up with this:



          awk -v col=$col '
          typeof($col) != "strnum" {
          print "Error on line " NR ": " $col " is not numeric"
          noprint=1
          exit 1
          }
          {
          sum+=$col
          }
          END {
          if(!noprint)
          print sum
          }' $file


          This uses typeof, which is a GNU awk extension. typeof($col) returns 'strnum' if $col is a valid number, and 'string' or 'unassigned' if it is not.



          See Can I determine type of an awk variable?






          share|improve this answer


























            5












            5








            5







            I ended up with this:



            awk -v col=$col '
            typeof($col) != "strnum" {
            print "Error on line " NR ": " $col " is not numeric"
            noprint=1
            exit 1
            }
            {
            sum+=$col
            }
            END {
            if(!noprint)
            print sum
            }' $file


            This uses typeof, which is a GNU awk extension. typeof($col) returns 'strnum' if $col is a valid number, and 'string' or 'unassigned' if it is not.



            See Can I determine type of an awk variable?






            share|improve this answer













            I ended up with this:



            awk -v col=$col '
            typeof($col) != "strnum" {
            print "Error on line " NR ": " $col " is not numeric"
            noprint=1
            exit 1
            }
            {
            sum+=$col
            }
            END {
            if(!noprint)
            print sum
            }' $file


            This uses typeof, which is a GNU awk extension. typeof($col) returns 'strnum' if $col is a valid number, and 'string' or 'unassigned' if it is not.



            See Can I determine type of an awk variable?







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 20 hours ago









            Nick ODellNick ODell

            1,0492920




            1,0492920























                1















                If you give it a file that doesn't have numeric data,




                $col ~ /[^-.[:digit:]]/ {print "Error, non-numeric :"; print $col; exit 1};


                Explanation just use a RegEx to check for the presence of characters which are not digits nor floating point, sign, etc.




                (or if one number is missing)




                add



                || ($col == "")


                or



                || (length($col) == 0)


                to the rule.



                Or you could use a comparison to NF if it's the last column like in your example.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                DrYak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                  1















                  If you give it a file that doesn't have numeric data,




                  $col ~ /[^-.[:digit:]]/ {print "Error, non-numeric :"; print $col; exit 1};


                  Explanation just use a RegEx to check for the presence of characters which are not digits nor floating point, sign, etc.




                  (or if one number is missing)




                  add



                  || ($col == "")


                  or



                  || (length($col) == 0)


                  to the rule.



                  Or you could use a comparison to NF if it's the last column like in your example.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  DrYak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.























                    1












                    1








                    1








                    If you give it a file that doesn't have numeric data,




                    $col ~ /[^-.[:digit:]]/ {print "Error, non-numeric :"; print $col; exit 1};


                    Explanation just use a RegEx to check for the presence of characters which are not digits nor floating point, sign, etc.




                    (or if one number is missing)




                    add



                    || ($col == "")


                    or



                    || (length($col) == 0)


                    to the rule.



                    Or you could use a comparison to NF if it's the last column like in your example.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    DrYak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.











                    If you give it a file that doesn't have numeric data,




                    $col ~ /[^-.[:digit:]]/ {print "Error, non-numeric :"; print $col; exit 1};


                    Explanation just use a RegEx to check for the presence of characters which are not digits nor floating point, sign, etc.




                    (or if one number is missing)




                    add



                    || ($col == "")


                    or



                    || (length($col) == 0)


                    to the rule.



                    Or you could use a comparison to NF if it's the last column like in your example.







                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    DrYak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer






                    New contributor




                    DrYak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered 21 hours ago









                    DrYakDrYak

                    1915




                    1915




                    New contributor




                    DrYak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    DrYak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    DrYak is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.























                        1














                        awk -v col=2 '
                        $col+0==0 && $col!~/^[+-]?0/ { print "bad number " $col > "/dev/stderr" }
                        {sum+=$col}
                        END{print sum}' input-file


                        It's up to you to complicate it if you want it to also handle .0 or .0e+33 as valid representations of 0; notice that awk will ignore trailing junk when converting strings to numbers ("1.4e1e3"+0, "1.4e1.e7"+0 or "14+13"+0 will be all equal to 14).






                        share|improve this answer




























                          1














                          awk -v col=2 '
                          $col+0==0 && $col!~/^[+-]?0/ { print "bad number " $col > "/dev/stderr" }
                          {sum+=$col}
                          END{print sum}' input-file


                          It's up to you to complicate it if you want it to also handle .0 or .0e+33 as valid representations of 0; notice that awk will ignore trailing junk when converting strings to numbers ("1.4e1e3"+0, "1.4e1.e7"+0 or "14+13"+0 will be all equal to 14).






                          share|improve this answer


























                            1












                            1








                            1







                            awk -v col=2 '
                            $col+0==0 && $col!~/^[+-]?0/ { print "bad number " $col > "/dev/stderr" }
                            {sum+=$col}
                            END{print sum}' input-file


                            It's up to you to complicate it if you want it to also handle .0 or .0e+33 as valid representations of 0; notice that awk will ignore trailing junk when converting strings to numbers ("1.4e1e3"+0, "1.4e1.e7"+0 or "14+13"+0 will be all equal to 14).






                            share|improve this answer













                            awk -v col=2 '
                            $col+0==0 && $col!~/^[+-]?0/ { print "bad number " $col > "/dev/stderr" }
                            {sum+=$col}
                            END{print sum}' input-file


                            It's up to you to complicate it if you want it to also handle .0 or .0e+33 as valid representations of 0; notice that awk will ignore trailing junk when converting strings to numbers ("1.4e1e3"+0, "1.4e1.e7"+0 or "14+13"+0 will be all equal to 14).







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 12 hours ago









                            Uncle BillyUncle Billy

                            4115




                            4115






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494889%2fmake-awk-produce-error-on-non-numeric%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Loup dans la culture

                                How to solve the problem of ntp “Unable to contact time server” from KDE?

                                Connection limited (no internet access)