Find maximum of the output from reduce












2












$begingroup$


I am trying to reduce a function in two variables($n_1$ and $n_2$) whose domain is the set of Integers. I get a long list of pairs of values for these two variables(instead of a range). This could be because the range of $n_2$ changes for each $n_1$. I just want the maximum value of $n_1$ and $n_2$. Can you please guide me?



   driftParamSet = 1.9 - 0.2 Subscript[n, 2] + Subscript[n, 1] (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 Subscript[n, 1])/(1. Subscript[n, 1] + 1.5 Subscript[n, 2]));

   drift[Gamma] = 17;

   Reduce[driftParamSet> -drift[Gamma] && Subscript[n, 1]>= 0 && Subscript[n, 2]>= 0,{Subscript[n, 1],Subscript[n, 2]}, Integers];


Current output:
$n_1=0land n_2=1left|n_1=0land n_2=2right|n_1=0land n_2=3|n_1=0land n_2=4
\......\left|n_1=0land n_2=90right|n_1=0land n_2=91|\.....\
left(n_1=92land n_2=2right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=0right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=1right)lor left(n_1=94land n_2=0right)$



Expected output:



$n_1$=94 and $n_2=$91






equation-solving functions







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Several symbols in your code are undefined. Please provide the definitions to aid the reader in answering your question.
    $endgroup$
    – bbgodfrey
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @bbgodfrey, sorry about that. I have updated the question now.
    $endgroup$
    – gaganso
    1 hour ago
















2












$begingroup$


I am trying to reduce a function in two variables($n_1$ and $n_2$) whose domain is the set of Integers. I get a long list of pairs of values for these two variables(instead of a range). This could be because the range of $n_2$ changes for each $n_1$. I just want the maximum value of $n_1$ and $n_2$. Can you please guide me?



   driftParamSet = 1.9 - 0.2 Subscript[n, 2] + Subscript[n, 1] (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 Subscript[n, 1])/(1. Subscript[n, 1] + 1.5 Subscript[n, 2]));

   drift[Gamma] = 17;

   Reduce[driftParamSet> -drift[Gamma] && Subscript[n, 1]>= 0 && Subscript[n, 2]>= 0,{Subscript[n, 1],Subscript[n, 2]}, Integers];


Current output:
$n_1=0land n_2=1left|n_1=0land n_2=2right|n_1=0land n_2=3|n_1=0land n_2=4
\......\left|n_1=0land n_2=90right|n_1=0land n_2=91|\.....\
left(n_1=92land n_2=2right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=0right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=1right)lor left(n_1=94land n_2=0right)$



Expected output:



$n_1$=94 and $n_2=$91






equation-solving functions







share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Several symbols in your code are undefined. Please provide the definitions to aid the reader in answering your question.
    $endgroup$
    – bbgodfrey
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @bbgodfrey, sorry about that. I have updated the question now.
    $endgroup$
    – gaganso
    1 hour ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I am trying to reduce a function in two variables($n_1$ and $n_2$) whose domain is the set of Integers. I get a long list of pairs of values for these two variables(instead of a range). This could be because the range of $n_2$ changes for each $n_1$. I just want the maximum value of $n_1$ and $n_2$. Can you please guide me?



   driftParamSet = 1.9 - 0.2 Subscript[n, 2] + Subscript[n, 1] (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 Subscript[n, 1])/(1. Subscript[n, 1] + 1.5 Subscript[n, 2]));

   drift[Gamma] = 17;

   Reduce[driftParamSet> -drift[Gamma] && Subscript[n, 1]>= 0 && Subscript[n, 2]>= 0,{Subscript[n, 1],Subscript[n, 2]}, Integers];


Current output:
$n_1=0land n_2=1left|n_1=0land n_2=2right|n_1=0land n_2=3|n_1=0land n_2=4
\......\left|n_1=0land n_2=90right|n_1=0land n_2=91|\.....\
left(n_1=92land n_2=2right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=0right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=1right)lor left(n_1=94land n_2=0right)$



Expected output:



$n_1$=94 and $n_2=$91






equation-solving functions







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am trying to reduce a function in two variables($n_1$ and $n_2$) whose domain is the set of Integers. I get a long list of pairs of values for these two variables(instead of a range). This could be because the range of $n_2$ changes for each $n_1$. I just want the maximum value of $n_1$ and $n_2$. Can you please guide me?



   driftParamSet = 1.9 - 0.2 Subscript[n, 2] + Subscript[n, 1] (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 Subscript[n, 1])/(1. Subscript[n, 1] + 1.5 Subscript[n, 2]));

   drift[Gamma] = 17;

   Reduce[driftParamSet> -drift[Gamma] && Subscript[n, 1]>= 0 && Subscript[n, 2]>= 0,{Subscript[n, 1],Subscript[n, 2]}, Integers];


Current output:
$n_1=0land n_2=1left|n_1=0land n_2=2right|n_1=0land n_2=3|n_1=0land n_2=4
\......\left|n_1=0land n_2=90right|n_1=0land n_2=91|\.....\
left(n_1=92land n_2=2right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=0right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=1right)lor left(n_1=94land n_2=0right)$



Expected output:



$n_1$=94 and $n_2=$91






equation-solving functions




equation-solving functions






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







gaganso

















asked 2 hours ago









gagansogaganso

1207




1207








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Several symbols in your code are undefined. Please provide the definitions to aid the reader in answering your question.
    $endgroup$
    – bbgodfrey
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @bbgodfrey, sorry about that. I have updated the question now.
    $endgroup$
    – gaganso
    1 hour ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Several symbols in your code are undefined. Please provide the definitions to aid the reader in answering your question.
    $endgroup$
    – bbgodfrey
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @bbgodfrey, sorry about that. I have updated the question now.
    $endgroup$
    – gaganso
    1 hour ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Several symbols in your code are undefined. Please provide the definitions to aid the reader in answering your question.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Several symbols in your code are undefined. Please provide the definitions to aid the reader in answering your question.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@bbgodfrey, sorry about that. I have updated the question now.
$endgroup$
– gaganso
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@bbgodfrey, sorry about that. I have updated the question now.
$endgroup$
– gaganso
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Let the large result of Reduce be rs. Then the maximum of each quantity is determined by



Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 1], z_] -> z, Infinity]

(* 94 *)

Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 2], z_] -> z, Infinity]

(* 94 *)


not 91 as speculated in the question. The corresponding terms in rs can be obtained by



Position[rs, 94, Infinity]

(* {{94, 2, 2}, {4559, 1, 2}} *)



rs[[94]]

(* Subscript[n, 1] == 0 && Subscript[n, 2] == 94 *)



rs[[4559]]

(* Subscript[n, 1] == 94 && Subscript[n, 2] == 0 *)





share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
    $endgroup$
    – gaganso
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @gaganso Precisely so.
    $endgroup$
    – bbgodfrey
    1 hour ago



















3












$begingroup$

An alternative is to use Solve after Rationalizeing input expressions:



driftParamSet = Rationalize[1.9 - 0.2 n2 + 

  n1 (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 n1)/(1. n1 + 1.5 n2)), 10^-16]

driftγ = 17;

solutions = Solve[driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0, {n1, n2}, Integers];



Max /@ Transpose[{n1, n2} /. solutions]



{94, 94}




Yet another approach is using ArgMax:



Extract[ArgMax[{#, driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0}, {n1, n2}, Integers]& /@ 

  {n1, n2}, {{1, 1}, {-1, -1}}]



{94, 94}







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192764%2ffind-maximum-of-the-output-from-reduce%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Let the large result of Reduce be rs. Then the maximum of each quantity is determined by



    Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 1], z_] -> z, Infinity]
    
(* 94 *)
    
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 2], z_] -> z, Infinity]
    
(* 94 *)


    not 91 as speculated in the question. The corresponding terms in rs can be obtained by



    Position[rs, 94, Infinity]
    
(* {{94, 2, 2}, {4559, 1, 2}} *)
    

    
rs[[94]]
    
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 0 && Subscript[n, 2] == 94 *)
    

    
rs[[4559]]
    
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 94 && Subscript[n, 2] == 0 *)





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
      $endgroup$
      – gaganso
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @gaganso Precisely so.
      $endgroup$
      – bbgodfrey
      1 hour ago
















    3












    $begingroup$

    Let the large result of Reduce be rs. Then the maximum of each quantity is determined by



    Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 1], z_] -> z, Infinity]
    
(* 94 *)
    
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 2], z_] -> z, Infinity]
    
(* 94 *)


    not 91 as speculated in the question. The corresponding terms in rs can be obtained by



    Position[rs, 94, Infinity]
    
(* {{94, 2, 2}, {4559, 1, 2}} *)
    

    
rs[[94]]
    
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 0 && Subscript[n, 2] == 94 *)
    

    
rs[[4559]]
    
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 94 && Subscript[n, 2] == 0 *)





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
      $endgroup$
      – gaganso
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @gaganso Precisely so.
      $endgroup$
      – bbgodfrey
      1 hour ago














    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Let the large result of Reduce be rs. Then the maximum of each quantity is determined by



    Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 1], z_] -> z, Infinity]
    
(* 94 *)
    
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 2], z_] -> z, Infinity]
    
(* 94 *)


    not 91 as speculated in the question. The corresponding terms in rs can be obtained by



    Position[rs, 94, Infinity]
    
(* {{94, 2, 2}, {4559, 1, 2}} *)
    

    
rs[[94]]
    
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 0 && Subscript[n, 2] == 94 *)
    

    
rs[[4559]]
    
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 94 && Subscript[n, 2] == 0 *)





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Let the large result of Reduce be rs. Then the maximum of each quantity is determined by



    Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 1], z_] -> z, Infinity]
    
(* 94 *)
    
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 2], z_] -> z, Infinity]
    
(* 94 *)


    not 91 as speculated in the question. The corresponding terms in rs can be obtained by



    Position[rs, 94, Infinity]
    
(* {{94, 2, 2}, {4559, 1, 2}} *)
    

    
rs[[94]]
    
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 0 && Subscript[n, 2] == 94 *)
    

    
rs[[4559]]
    
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 94 && Subscript[n, 2] == 0 *)






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 1 hour ago

























    answered 1 hour ago









    bbgodfreybbgodfrey

    44.8k958110




    44.8k958110












    • $begingroup$
      thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
      $endgroup$
      – gaganso
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @gaganso Precisely so.
      $endgroup$
      – bbgodfrey
      1 hour ago


















    • $begingroup$
      thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
      $endgroup$
      – gaganso
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @gaganso Precisely so.
      $endgroup$
      – bbgodfrey
      1 hour ago
















    $begingroup$
    thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
    $endgroup$
    – gaganso
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
    $endgroup$
    – gaganso
    1 hour ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @gaganso Precisely so.
    $endgroup$
    – bbgodfrey
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    @gaganso Precisely so.
    $endgroup$
    – bbgodfrey
    1 hour ago











    3












    $begingroup$

    An alternative is to use Solve after Rationalizeing input expressions:



    driftParamSet = Rationalize[1.9 - 0.2 n2 + 
    
  n1 (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 n1)/(1. n1 + 1.5 n2)), 10^-16]
    
driftγ = 17;
    
solutions = Solve[driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0, {n1, n2}, Integers];
    

    
Max /@ Transpose[{n1, n2} /. solutions]



    {94, 94}




    Yet another approach is using ArgMax:



    Extract[ArgMax[{#, driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0}, {n1, n2}, Integers]& /@ 
    
  {n1, n2}, {{1, 1}, {-1, -1}}]



    {94, 94}







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      An alternative is to use Solve after Rationalizeing input expressions:



      driftParamSet = Rationalize[1.9 - 0.2 n2 + 
      
  n1 (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 n1)/(1. n1 + 1.5 n2)), 10^-16]
      
driftγ = 17;
      
solutions = Solve[driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0, {n1, n2}, Integers];
      

      
Max /@ Transpose[{n1, n2} /. solutions]



      {94, 94}




      Yet another approach is using ArgMax:



      Extract[ArgMax[{#, driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0}, {n1, n2}, Integers]& /@ 
      
  {n1, n2}, {{1, 1}, {-1, -1}}]



      {94, 94}







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        An alternative is to use Solve after Rationalizeing input expressions:



        driftParamSet = Rationalize[1.9 - 0.2 n2 + 
        
  n1 (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 n1)/(1. n1 + 1.5 n2)), 10^-16]
        
driftγ = 17;
        
solutions = Solve[driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0, {n1, n2}, Integers];
        

        
Max /@ Transpose[{n1, n2} /. solutions]



        {94, 94}




        Yet another approach is using ArgMax:



        Extract[ArgMax[{#, driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0}, {n1, n2}, Integers]& /@ 
        
  {n1, n2}, {{1, 1}, {-1, -1}}]



        {94, 94}







        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        An alternative is to use Solve after Rationalizeing input expressions:



        driftParamSet = Rationalize[1.9 - 0.2 n2 + 
        
  n1 (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 n1)/(1. n1 + 1.5 n2)), 10^-16]
        
driftγ = 17;
        
solutions = Solve[driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0, {n1, n2}, Integers];
        

        
Max /@ Transpose[{n1, n2} /. solutions]



        {94, 94}




        Yet another approach is using ArgMax:



        Extract[ArgMax[{#, driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0}, {n1, n2}, Integers]& /@ 
        
  {n1, n2}, {{1, 1}, {-1, -1}}]



        {94, 94}








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 44 mins ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        kglrkglr

        187k10203421




        187k10203421






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192764%2ffind-maximum-of-the-output-from-reduce%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Loup dans la culture

            Image
            Loups sur une enluminure du Bestiaire d'Aberdeen Le loup est l'animal le plus emblématique de l'histoire de l'Eurasie, il était à l'honneur durant l'Antiquité chez la totalité des anciens peuples européens [ 1 ] . Sommaire 1 Le loup dans la mythologie 2 Les loups dans le folklore 2.1 L'évolution des mentalités 2.2 Le loup dans la psychanalyse 3 Le loup dans les œuvres culturelles 3.1 Le loup dans la littérature 3.1.1 Fables 3.1.2 Poésie 3.1.3 Romans 3.1.4 Littérature jeunesse 3.1.4.1 Quelques titres d'albums contemporains 3.1.5 Bande dessinée 3.2 Le loup à l'écran 3.2.1 Le cinéma et la télévision 3.2.2 Documentaires 3.2.3 Dessins animés 3.2.4 Jeux vidéo 3.3 Le loup en peinture et en sculpture 3.4 Le loup dans les œuvres musicales 4 Le loup et les noms propres 5 Bibliographie 6 Notes et références 7 Voir aussi 7.1 Articles connexes
            Read more

            How to solve the problem of ntp “Unable to contact time server” from KDE?

            Image
            1 0 I want to set date and time automatically but this error appears when I try to .. I'm using openSUSE, I tried different servers but it didn't work either, help please! It doesn't seem to be a network problem: $ ping pool.ntp.org 64 bytes from 41.78.128.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=41 time=260 ms To the question of whether ntpd is installed and running: $ ps -C ntpd PID TTY TIME CMD i.e. there's no ntpd process running. $ rpm -qa | grep ntp yast2-ntp-client-3.1.12-1.7.noarch ntp-4.2.6p5-25.2.1.i586 Further information from the comments: $ sudo ntpdate pool.ntp.org 25 Sep 19:41:51 ntpdate[3162]: no server suitable for synchronization found networking kde opensuse ntp ntpd sh
            Read more

            ASUS Zenbook UX433/UX333 — Configure Touchpad-embedded numpad on Linux

            Image
            0 1 I have an ASUS Zenbook UX433,on which ASUS decided to innovate by embedding a Numpad inside the touchpad (see picture 1). Toggling between classic touchpad mode and numpad (also turns the touchpad LEDs on) can be done through the golden button in the top-right corner of the touchpad. However, on my Manjaro arch Linux config, this behavior does not work by default and I can only use the touchpad, no numpad. Has anyone been able to configure the numpad to work on Linux, or have any idea how this could be achieved? EDIT1: I have had a look at the official Windows drivers for the UX433FA TouchPad, but was not able to make anything of it. I tried installing them on Linux using tools like NDISWrapper, but they do not detect the TouchPad/Numpad hardware, and my understanding of drivers is too limited.
            Read more