Does YouTube delete video dislikes?












51















On some YouTube videos, particularly highly downvoted ones, I often see comments asserting that their dislikes on the video are being deleted, either by YouTube or the channel itself.



From the Gillette "We Believe" ad:




Fake dislike count: 761k of dislikes.. Real (but censored) dislikes count: 2.6M of dislikes..



Fake likes, and removing dislikes. I will Never buy Gillette again, i hope they go out of business.



I disliked the video. But, it is automatically getting undisliked. YouTube is being dishonest.



Without YouTube's cloak of censorship, this video would have about 3 million dislikes.



Anyone else noticing that the downvotes are diminishing? As I write, the downvotes are 138,153—yet when I first saw this video a few minutes ago, they were at +140,000 downvotes. Is Susan Wojcicki massaging the numbers at Gillette's urging? Inquiring minds want to know.




A post from the Google Product Forums:




What can be done to stop YouTube's moderators from deleting another 3 MILLION dislikes and another 3 MILLION comments they don't agree with for political reasons from this video?




Reddit: YouTube removing dislikes from rewind:




Don’t be dumb... youtube caches dislikes so that there main servers don’t get pounded with millions of people doing this. Dislike once and wait maybe a hour and check later, it will be there.



I just disliked, and it was at the same number they’re definitely deleting shit




Reddit: Blizzard somehow just deleted 100k dislikes from their Diablo announcement video




Bottom line: when there's a lot of automated activity, Google comes in every now and then and scrubs the data of anything that looks suspect. Not shockingly (given that 4chan has been heavily involved in the uproar) there are a lot of bots involved in this process.



People are saying maybe they cleared bots but why didn't the likes go down either, at least by SOME amount.




So my questions are:




  • Is it true that the number of dislikes on a video can and does decrease en masse over time? (It seems to be true.)

  • What might be the cause of this? Can a channel delete dislikes? Does YouTube have an automated algorithm that deletes dislikes that seem to be from bots? Does YouTube remove dislikes if you haven't watched 80% of the video? (Obviously, it's possible that users might decide to all undo their downvotes later, but that seems implausible.)










share|improve this question









New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 18





    Please only answer with actual evidence and not personal theories such as "they do it", "it's an anti-fraud script", "it's eventual consistency", etc. Skeptics is not the place for speculation and personal opinions, but for reporting facts. We delete answers which are not reference based.

    – Sklivvz
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    In none of the linked pages do I see anything actually showing a decreased number (note: the imgur link in the Reddit link does not play). Voting to close as 'no notable claim'.

    – Jan Doggen
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @JanDoggen this is really notable, see: google.com/search?q=diablo+disappearing+dislikes

    – Sklivvz
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    Note that there most probably will be no official detailed answer. Google doesn't want you to game the ranking system (which likes and dislikes are part of), so they will be intentionally vague about its inner workings. Much like SO won't tell how exactly the vote reversing script works.

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    It should be noted that Youtube would be reasonably justified in trying to reject likes/dislikes produced by "bots". Whether this is their only motivation, and whether they are doing a reasonable job of it, however, is impossible to judge from this distance.

    – Daniel R Hicks
    8 hours ago


















51















On some YouTube videos, particularly highly downvoted ones, I often see comments asserting that their dislikes on the video are being deleted, either by YouTube or the channel itself.



From the Gillette "We Believe" ad:




Fake dislike count: 761k of dislikes.. Real (but censored) dislikes count: 2.6M of dislikes..



Fake likes, and removing dislikes. I will Never buy Gillette again, i hope they go out of business.



I disliked the video. But, it is automatically getting undisliked. YouTube is being dishonest.



Without YouTube's cloak of censorship, this video would have about 3 million dislikes.



Anyone else noticing that the downvotes are diminishing? As I write, the downvotes are 138,153—yet when I first saw this video a few minutes ago, they were at +140,000 downvotes. Is Susan Wojcicki massaging the numbers at Gillette's urging? Inquiring minds want to know.




A post from the Google Product Forums:




What can be done to stop YouTube's moderators from deleting another 3 MILLION dislikes and another 3 MILLION comments they don't agree with for political reasons from this video?




Reddit: YouTube removing dislikes from rewind:




Don’t be dumb... youtube caches dislikes so that there main servers don’t get pounded with millions of people doing this. Dislike once and wait maybe a hour and check later, it will be there.



I just disliked, and it was at the same number they’re definitely deleting shit




Reddit: Blizzard somehow just deleted 100k dislikes from their Diablo announcement video




Bottom line: when there's a lot of automated activity, Google comes in every now and then and scrubs the data of anything that looks suspect. Not shockingly (given that 4chan has been heavily involved in the uproar) there are a lot of bots involved in this process.



People are saying maybe they cleared bots but why didn't the likes go down either, at least by SOME amount.




So my questions are:




  • Is it true that the number of dislikes on a video can and does decrease en masse over time? (It seems to be true.)

  • What might be the cause of this? Can a channel delete dislikes? Does YouTube have an automated algorithm that deletes dislikes that seem to be from bots? Does YouTube remove dislikes if you haven't watched 80% of the video? (Obviously, it's possible that users might decide to all undo their downvotes later, but that seems implausible.)










share|improve this question









New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 18





    Please only answer with actual evidence and not personal theories such as "they do it", "it's an anti-fraud script", "it's eventual consistency", etc. Skeptics is not the place for speculation and personal opinions, but for reporting facts. We delete answers which are not reference based.

    – Sklivvz
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    In none of the linked pages do I see anything actually showing a decreased number (note: the imgur link in the Reddit link does not play). Voting to close as 'no notable claim'.

    – Jan Doggen
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @JanDoggen this is really notable, see: google.com/search?q=diablo+disappearing+dislikes

    – Sklivvz
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    Note that there most probably will be no official detailed answer. Google doesn't want you to game the ranking system (which likes and dislikes are part of), so they will be intentionally vague about its inner workings. Much like SO won't tell how exactly the vote reversing script works.

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    It should be noted that Youtube would be reasonably justified in trying to reject likes/dislikes produced by "bots". Whether this is their only motivation, and whether they are doing a reasonable job of it, however, is impossible to judge from this distance.

    – Daniel R Hicks
    8 hours ago
















51












51








51


6






On some YouTube videos, particularly highly downvoted ones, I often see comments asserting that their dislikes on the video are being deleted, either by YouTube or the channel itself.



From the Gillette "We Believe" ad:




Fake dislike count: 761k of dislikes.. Real (but censored) dislikes count: 2.6M of dislikes..



Fake likes, and removing dislikes. I will Never buy Gillette again, i hope they go out of business.



I disliked the video. But, it is automatically getting undisliked. YouTube is being dishonest.



Without YouTube's cloak of censorship, this video would have about 3 million dislikes.



Anyone else noticing that the downvotes are diminishing? As I write, the downvotes are 138,153—yet when I first saw this video a few minutes ago, they were at +140,000 downvotes. Is Susan Wojcicki massaging the numbers at Gillette's urging? Inquiring minds want to know.




A post from the Google Product Forums:




What can be done to stop YouTube's moderators from deleting another 3 MILLION dislikes and another 3 MILLION comments they don't agree with for political reasons from this video?




Reddit: YouTube removing dislikes from rewind:




Don’t be dumb... youtube caches dislikes so that there main servers don’t get pounded with millions of people doing this. Dislike once and wait maybe a hour and check later, it will be there.



I just disliked, and it was at the same number they’re definitely deleting shit




Reddit: Blizzard somehow just deleted 100k dislikes from their Diablo announcement video




Bottom line: when there's a lot of automated activity, Google comes in every now and then and scrubs the data of anything that looks suspect. Not shockingly (given that 4chan has been heavily involved in the uproar) there are a lot of bots involved in this process.



People are saying maybe they cleared bots but why didn't the likes go down either, at least by SOME amount.




So my questions are:




  • Is it true that the number of dislikes on a video can and does decrease en masse over time? (It seems to be true.)

  • What might be the cause of this? Can a channel delete dislikes? Does YouTube have an automated algorithm that deletes dislikes that seem to be from bots? Does YouTube remove dislikes if you haven't watched 80% of the video? (Obviously, it's possible that users might decide to all undo their downvotes later, but that seems implausible.)










share|improve this question









New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












On some YouTube videos, particularly highly downvoted ones, I often see comments asserting that their dislikes on the video are being deleted, either by YouTube or the channel itself.



From the Gillette "We Believe" ad:




Fake dislike count: 761k of dislikes.. Real (but censored) dislikes count: 2.6M of dislikes..



Fake likes, and removing dislikes. I will Never buy Gillette again, i hope they go out of business.



I disliked the video. But, it is automatically getting undisliked. YouTube is being dishonest.



Without YouTube's cloak of censorship, this video would have about 3 million dislikes.



Anyone else noticing that the downvotes are diminishing? As I write, the downvotes are 138,153—yet when I first saw this video a few minutes ago, they were at +140,000 downvotes. Is Susan Wojcicki massaging the numbers at Gillette's urging? Inquiring minds want to know.




A post from the Google Product Forums:




What can be done to stop YouTube's moderators from deleting another 3 MILLION dislikes and another 3 MILLION comments they don't agree with for political reasons from this video?




Reddit: YouTube removing dislikes from rewind:




Don’t be dumb... youtube caches dislikes so that there main servers don’t get pounded with millions of people doing this. Dislike once and wait maybe a hour and check later, it will be there.



I just disliked, and it was at the same number they’re definitely deleting shit




Reddit: Blizzard somehow just deleted 100k dislikes from their Diablo announcement video




Bottom line: when there's a lot of automated activity, Google comes in every now and then and scrubs the data of anything that looks suspect. Not shockingly (given that 4chan has been heavily involved in the uproar) there are a lot of bots involved in this process.



People are saying maybe they cleared bots but why didn't the likes go down either, at least by SOME amount.




So my questions are:




  • Is it true that the number of dislikes on a video can and does decrease en masse over time? (It seems to be true.)

  • What might be the cause of this? Can a channel delete dislikes? Does YouTube have an automated algorithm that deletes dislikes that seem to be from bots? Does YouTube remove dislikes if you haven't watched 80% of the video? (Obviously, it's possible that users might decide to all undo their downvotes later, but that seems implausible.)







internet social-media google






share|improve this question









New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 14 hours ago







MiCl













New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 14 hours ago









MiClMiCl

30737




30737




New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 18





    Please only answer with actual evidence and not personal theories such as "they do it", "it's an anti-fraud script", "it's eventual consistency", etc. Skeptics is not the place for speculation and personal opinions, but for reporting facts. We delete answers which are not reference based.

    – Sklivvz
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    In none of the linked pages do I see anything actually showing a decreased number (note: the imgur link in the Reddit link does not play). Voting to close as 'no notable claim'.

    – Jan Doggen
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @JanDoggen this is really notable, see: google.com/search?q=diablo+disappearing+dislikes

    – Sklivvz
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    Note that there most probably will be no official detailed answer. Google doesn't want you to game the ranking system (which likes and dislikes are part of), so they will be intentionally vague about its inner workings. Much like SO won't tell how exactly the vote reversing script works.

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    It should be noted that Youtube would be reasonably justified in trying to reject likes/dislikes produced by "bots". Whether this is their only motivation, and whether they are doing a reasonable job of it, however, is impossible to judge from this distance.

    – Daniel R Hicks
    8 hours ago
















  • 18





    Please only answer with actual evidence and not personal theories such as "they do it", "it's an anti-fraud script", "it's eventual consistency", etc. Skeptics is not the place for speculation and personal opinions, but for reporting facts. We delete answers which are not reference based.

    – Sklivvz
    13 hours ago






  • 1





    In none of the linked pages do I see anything actually showing a decreased number (note: the imgur link in the Reddit link does not play). Voting to close as 'no notable claim'.

    – Jan Doggen
    13 hours ago






  • 3





    @JanDoggen this is really notable, see: google.com/search?q=diablo+disappearing+dislikes

    – Sklivvz
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    Note that there most probably will be no official detailed answer. Google doesn't want you to game the ranking system (which likes and dislikes are part of), so they will be intentionally vague about its inner workings. Much like SO won't tell how exactly the vote reversing script works.

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    9 hours ago






  • 2





    It should be noted that Youtube would be reasonably justified in trying to reject likes/dislikes produced by "bots". Whether this is their only motivation, and whether they are doing a reasonable job of it, however, is impossible to judge from this distance.

    – Daniel R Hicks
    8 hours ago










18




18





Please only answer with actual evidence and not personal theories such as "they do it", "it's an anti-fraud script", "it's eventual consistency", etc. Skeptics is not the place for speculation and personal opinions, but for reporting facts. We delete answers which are not reference based.

– Sklivvz
13 hours ago





Please only answer with actual evidence and not personal theories such as "they do it", "it's an anti-fraud script", "it's eventual consistency", etc. Skeptics is not the place for speculation and personal opinions, but for reporting facts. We delete answers which are not reference based.

– Sklivvz
13 hours ago




1




1





In none of the linked pages do I see anything actually showing a decreased number (note: the imgur link in the Reddit link does not play). Voting to close as 'no notable claim'.

– Jan Doggen
13 hours ago





In none of the linked pages do I see anything actually showing a decreased number (note: the imgur link in the Reddit link does not play). Voting to close as 'no notable claim'.

– Jan Doggen
13 hours ago




3




3





@JanDoggen this is really notable, see: google.com/search?q=diablo+disappearing+dislikes

– Sklivvz
11 hours ago





@JanDoggen this is really notable, see: google.com/search?q=diablo+disappearing+dislikes

– Sklivvz
11 hours ago




3




3





Note that there most probably will be no official detailed answer. Google doesn't want you to game the ranking system (which likes and dislikes are part of), so they will be intentionally vague about its inner workings. Much like SO won't tell how exactly the vote reversing script works.

– Dmitry Grigoryev
9 hours ago





Note that there most probably will be no official detailed answer. Google doesn't want you to game the ranking system (which likes and dislikes are part of), so they will be intentionally vague about its inner workings. Much like SO won't tell how exactly the vote reversing script works.

– Dmitry Grigoryev
9 hours ago




2




2





It should be noted that Youtube would be reasonably justified in trying to reject likes/dislikes produced by "bots". Whether this is their only motivation, and whether they are doing a reasonable job of it, however, is impossible to judge from this distance.

– Daniel R Hicks
8 hours ago







It should be noted that Youtube would be reasonably justified in trying to reject likes/dislikes produced by "bots". Whether this is their only motivation, and whether they are doing a reasonable job of it, however, is impossible to judge from this distance.

– Daniel R Hicks
8 hours ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















85














YouTube itself says that it can remove dislikes. From Likes and Dislikes report:




You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy. [outdated link]







share|improve this answer
























  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Oddthinking
    1 min ago



















27














Yes, they do. They will also delete likes, as well.



However, the comments quoted and the general complaints on that video about dislikes going away are based on the claim that Gillette is either paying YouTube to delete dislikes, or that Gillette is doing it, itself.



One reason why YouTube deletes some likes and dislikes is because people often use likes, dislikes, followers, etc on social media to boost their own agendas or careers, so faking or manipulating popularity or unpopularity is pretty common.



To this end, there are business set up with individuals manning banks of devices so a person can deliver hundreds of "clicks" for a paying customer, low tech, or can set up automated programs/bots to simulate activity from different users, for the same result.



Low-tech Chinese Click Farm




To give you a general definition of clicks farms, they can be defined as:



An undercover operation in which individuals fraudulently interact with a website to artificially boost the status of a client’s website, product or service.



This basically means that somewhere in the world there are people that work behind closed doors fraudulently promoting other peoples products and services for a fee. Since the definition is fairly broad, this means that the fraudulent activity can take place on almost any platform although the most popular ones are Facebook and Instagram. It doesn’t matter if the group is selling Facebook likes of Twitter followers, they’re all classed as click farms.




PPC Protect: What is a click farm



It is in the interest of social media platforms to identify this kind of fraudulent manipulation to maintain their own integrity. So in this case, where people who don't like Gillette's ads are seeing nefarious manipulation by either Gillette, or YouTube as a paid proxy for Gillette, really it's the opposite - they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity that they identify.



As noted in another answer -




You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy.




YouTube: Likes and Dislikes report



Clicking on the "likes policies" hyperlink takes you to -




Artificial Traffic Spam



Anything that artificially increases the number of views, likes, comments, or other metric either through the use of automatic systems or by serving up videos to unsuspecting viewers, is against our terms. Additionally, content that solely exists to incentivize viewers for engagement (views, likes, comments, etc) is prohibited.




YouTube:Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies






share|improve this answer


























  • You should add sources.

    – Laurel
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    @Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

    – PoloHoleSet
    6 hours ago











  • I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

    – Broots Waymb
    5 hours ago











  • @BrootsWaymb - that's why I commented on that aspect - I was in the comments section of the video yesterday and was astounded by the number of people accusing Gillette of acting in bad faith, putting the blame there and not faulting YouTube/Google, so I felt that was some context that was missing from the original question.

    – PoloHoleSet
    5 hours ago











  • "they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity" - The way you phrased it, it sounds as if you imply the dislikes are "nefarious and fraudulent" and Google removes it. Is that your intention?

    – Fermi paradox
    3 hours ago



















1














It's been previously documented that "glitches" can also alter the like/dislike ratio on a large scale, for example, a Justin Bieber video (including, bizarrely, adding dislikes to likes), so it's entirely possible:



https://heavy.com/social/2013/05/youtube-glitch-removes-dislikes-adds-likes/



Given YouTube control the stats behind the scenes, they can hypothetically do anything on likes/dislikes (similar to the 301 views cap). As for why it might be occurring, one can only speculate just short of an internal leak.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    85














    YouTube itself says that it can remove dislikes. From Likes and Dislikes report:




    You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy. [outdated link]







    share|improve this answer
























    • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

      – Oddthinking
      1 min ago
















    85














    YouTube itself says that it can remove dislikes. From Likes and Dislikes report:




    You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy. [outdated link]







    share|improve this answer
























    • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

      – Oddthinking
      1 min ago














    85












    85








    85







    YouTube itself says that it can remove dislikes. From Likes and Dislikes report:




    You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy. [outdated link]







    share|improve this answer













    YouTube itself says that it can remove dislikes. From Likes and Dislikes report:




    You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy. [outdated link]








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 13 hours ago









    Andrew GrimmAndrew Grimm

    20.7k24102294




    20.7k24102294













    • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

      – Oddthinking
      1 min ago



















    • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

      – Oddthinking
      1 min ago

















    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Oddthinking
    1 min ago





    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Oddthinking
    1 min ago











    27














    Yes, they do. They will also delete likes, as well.



    However, the comments quoted and the general complaints on that video about dislikes going away are based on the claim that Gillette is either paying YouTube to delete dislikes, or that Gillette is doing it, itself.



    One reason why YouTube deletes some likes and dislikes is because people often use likes, dislikes, followers, etc on social media to boost their own agendas or careers, so faking or manipulating popularity or unpopularity is pretty common.



    To this end, there are business set up with individuals manning banks of devices so a person can deliver hundreds of "clicks" for a paying customer, low tech, or can set up automated programs/bots to simulate activity from different users, for the same result.



    Low-tech Chinese Click Farm




    To give you a general definition of clicks farms, they can be defined as:



    An undercover operation in which individuals fraudulently interact with a website to artificially boost the status of a client’s website, product or service.



    This basically means that somewhere in the world there are people that work behind closed doors fraudulently promoting other peoples products and services for a fee. Since the definition is fairly broad, this means that the fraudulent activity can take place on almost any platform although the most popular ones are Facebook and Instagram. It doesn’t matter if the group is selling Facebook likes of Twitter followers, they’re all classed as click farms.




    PPC Protect: What is a click farm



    It is in the interest of social media platforms to identify this kind of fraudulent manipulation to maintain their own integrity. So in this case, where people who don't like Gillette's ads are seeing nefarious manipulation by either Gillette, or YouTube as a paid proxy for Gillette, really it's the opposite - they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity that they identify.



    As noted in another answer -




    You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy.




    YouTube: Likes and Dislikes report



    Clicking on the "likes policies" hyperlink takes you to -




    Artificial Traffic Spam



    Anything that artificially increases the number of views, likes, comments, or other metric either through the use of automatic systems or by serving up videos to unsuspecting viewers, is against our terms. Additionally, content that solely exists to incentivize viewers for engagement (views, likes, comments, etc) is prohibited.




    YouTube:Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies






    share|improve this answer


























    • You should add sources.

      – Laurel
      6 hours ago






    • 2





      @Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

      – PoloHoleSet
      6 hours ago











    • I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

      – Broots Waymb
      5 hours ago











    • @BrootsWaymb - that's why I commented on that aspect - I was in the comments section of the video yesterday and was astounded by the number of people accusing Gillette of acting in bad faith, putting the blame there and not faulting YouTube/Google, so I felt that was some context that was missing from the original question.

      – PoloHoleSet
      5 hours ago











    • "they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity" - The way you phrased it, it sounds as if you imply the dislikes are "nefarious and fraudulent" and Google removes it. Is that your intention?

      – Fermi paradox
      3 hours ago
















    27














    Yes, they do. They will also delete likes, as well.



    However, the comments quoted and the general complaints on that video about dislikes going away are based on the claim that Gillette is either paying YouTube to delete dislikes, or that Gillette is doing it, itself.



    One reason why YouTube deletes some likes and dislikes is because people often use likes, dislikes, followers, etc on social media to boost their own agendas or careers, so faking or manipulating popularity or unpopularity is pretty common.



    To this end, there are business set up with individuals manning banks of devices so a person can deliver hundreds of "clicks" for a paying customer, low tech, or can set up automated programs/bots to simulate activity from different users, for the same result.



    Low-tech Chinese Click Farm




    To give you a general definition of clicks farms, they can be defined as:



    An undercover operation in which individuals fraudulently interact with a website to artificially boost the status of a client’s website, product or service.



    This basically means that somewhere in the world there are people that work behind closed doors fraudulently promoting other peoples products and services for a fee. Since the definition is fairly broad, this means that the fraudulent activity can take place on almost any platform although the most popular ones are Facebook and Instagram. It doesn’t matter if the group is selling Facebook likes of Twitter followers, they’re all classed as click farms.




    PPC Protect: What is a click farm



    It is in the interest of social media platforms to identify this kind of fraudulent manipulation to maintain their own integrity. So in this case, where people who don't like Gillette's ads are seeing nefarious manipulation by either Gillette, or YouTube as a paid proxy for Gillette, really it's the opposite - they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity that they identify.



    As noted in another answer -




    You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy.




    YouTube: Likes and Dislikes report



    Clicking on the "likes policies" hyperlink takes you to -




    Artificial Traffic Spam



    Anything that artificially increases the number of views, likes, comments, or other metric either through the use of automatic systems or by serving up videos to unsuspecting viewers, is against our terms. Additionally, content that solely exists to incentivize viewers for engagement (views, likes, comments, etc) is prohibited.




    YouTube:Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies






    share|improve this answer


























    • You should add sources.

      – Laurel
      6 hours ago






    • 2





      @Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

      – PoloHoleSet
      6 hours ago











    • I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

      – Broots Waymb
      5 hours ago











    • @BrootsWaymb - that's why I commented on that aspect - I was in the comments section of the video yesterday and was astounded by the number of people accusing Gillette of acting in bad faith, putting the blame there and not faulting YouTube/Google, so I felt that was some context that was missing from the original question.

      – PoloHoleSet
      5 hours ago











    • "they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity" - The way you phrased it, it sounds as if you imply the dislikes are "nefarious and fraudulent" and Google removes it. Is that your intention?

      – Fermi paradox
      3 hours ago














    27












    27








    27







    Yes, they do. They will also delete likes, as well.



    However, the comments quoted and the general complaints on that video about dislikes going away are based on the claim that Gillette is either paying YouTube to delete dislikes, or that Gillette is doing it, itself.



    One reason why YouTube deletes some likes and dislikes is because people often use likes, dislikes, followers, etc on social media to boost their own agendas or careers, so faking or manipulating popularity or unpopularity is pretty common.



    To this end, there are business set up with individuals manning banks of devices so a person can deliver hundreds of "clicks" for a paying customer, low tech, or can set up automated programs/bots to simulate activity from different users, for the same result.



    Low-tech Chinese Click Farm




    To give you a general definition of clicks farms, they can be defined as:



    An undercover operation in which individuals fraudulently interact with a website to artificially boost the status of a client’s website, product or service.



    This basically means that somewhere in the world there are people that work behind closed doors fraudulently promoting other peoples products and services for a fee. Since the definition is fairly broad, this means that the fraudulent activity can take place on almost any platform although the most popular ones are Facebook and Instagram. It doesn’t matter if the group is selling Facebook likes of Twitter followers, they’re all classed as click farms.




    PPC Protect: What is a click farm



    It is in the interest of social media platforms to identify this kind of fraudulent manipulation to maintain their own integrity. So in this case, where people who don't like Gillette's ads are seeing nefarious manipulation by either Gillette, or YouTube as a paid proxy for Gillette, really it's the opposite - they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity that they identify.



    As noted in another answer -




    You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy.




    YouTube: Likes and Dislikes report



    Clicking on the "likes policies" hyperlink takes you to -




    Artificial Traffic Spam



    Anything that artificially increases the number of views, likes, comments, or other metric either through the use of automatic systems or by serving up videos to unsuspecting viewers, is against our terms. Additionally, content that solely exists to incentivize viewers for engagement (views, likes, comments, etc) is prohibited.




    YouTube:Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies






    share|improve this answer















    Yes, they do. They will also delete likes, as well.



    However, the comments quoted and the general complaints on that video about dislikes going away are based on the claim that Gillette is either paying YouTube to delete dislikes, or that Gillette is doing it, itself.



    One reason why YouTube deletes some likes and dislikes is because people often use likes, dislikes, followers, etc on social media to boost their own agendas or careers, so faking or manipulating popularity or unpopularity is pretty common.



    To this end, there are business set up with individuals manning banks of devices so a person can deliver hundreds of "clicks" for a paying customer, low tech, or can set up automated programs/bots to simulate activity from different users, for the same result.



    Low-tech Chinese Click Farm




    To give you a general definition of clicks farms, they can be defined as:



    An undercover operation in which individuals fraudulently interact with a website to artificially boost the status of a client’s website, product or service.



    This basically means that somewhere in the world there are people that work behind closed doors fraudulently promoting other peoples products and services for a fee. Since the definition is fairly broad, this means that the fraudulent activity can take place on almost any platform although the most popular ones are Facebook and Instagram. It doesn’t matter if the group is selling Facebook likes of Twitter followers, they’re all classed as click farms.




    PPC Protect: What is a click farm



    It is in the interest of social media platforms to identify this kind of fraudulent manipulation to maintain their own integrity. So in this case, where people who don't like Gillette's ads are seeing nefarious manipulation by either Gillette, or YouTube as a paid proxy for Gillette, really it's the opposite - they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity that they identify.



    As noted in another answer -




    You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy.




    YouTube: Likes and Dislikes report



    Clicking on the "likes policies" hyperlink takes you to -




    Artificial Traffic Spam



    Anything that artificially increases the number of views, likes, comments, or other metric either through the use of automatic systems or by serving up videos to unsuspecting viewers, is against our terms. Additionally, content that solely exists to incentivize viewers for engagement (views, likes, comments, etc) is prohibited.




    YouTube:Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 5 hours ago

























    answered 6 hours ago









    PoloHoleSetPoloHoleSet

    7,49622339




    7,49622339













    • You should add sources.

      – Laurel
      6 hours ago






    • 2





      @Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

      – PoloHoleSet
      6 hours ago











    • I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

      – Broots Waymb
      5 hours ago











    • @BrootsWaymb - that's why I commented on that aspect - I was in the comments section of the video yesterday and was astounded by the number of people accusing Gillette of acting in bad faith, putting the blame there and not faulting YouTube/Google, so I felt that was some context that was missing from the original question.

      – PoloHoleSet
      5 hours ago











    • "they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity" - The way you phrased it, it sounds as if you imply the dislikes are "nefarious and fraudulent" and Google removes it. Is that your intention?

      – Fermi paradox
      3 hours ago



















    • You should add sources.

      – Laurel
      6 hours ago






    • 2





      @Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

      – PoloHoleSet
      6 hours ago











    • I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

      – Broots Waymb
      5 hours ago











    • @BrootsWaymb - that's why I commented on that aspect - I was in the comments section of the video yesterday and was astounded by the number of people accusing Gillette of acting in bad faith, putting the blame there and not faulting YouTube/Google, so I felt that was some context that was missing from the original question.

      – PoloHoleSet
      5 hours ago











    • "they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity" - The way you phrased it, it sounds as if you imply the dislikes are "nefarious and fraudulent" and Google removes it. Is that your intention?

      – Fermi paradox
      3 hours ago

















    You should add sources.

    – Laurel
    6 hours ago





    You should add sources.

    – Laurel
    6 hours ago




    2




    2





    @Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

    – PoloHoleSet
    6 hours ago





    @Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

    – PoloHoleSet
    6 hours ago













    I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

    – Broots Waymb
    5 hours ago





    I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

    – Broots Waymb
    5 hours ago













    @BrootsWaymb - that's why I commented on that aspect - I was in the comments section of the video yesterday and was astounded by the number of people accusing Gillette of acting in bad faith, putting the blame there and not faulting YouTube/Google, so I felt that was some context that was missing from the original question.

    – PoloHoleSet
    5 hours ago





    @BrootsWaymb - that's why I commented on that aspect - I was in the comments section of the video yesterday and was astounded by the number of people accusing Gillette of acting in bad faith, putting the blame there and not faulting YouTube/Google, so I felt that was some context that was missing from the original question.

    – PoloHoleSet
    5 hours ago













    "they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity" - The way you phrased it, it sounds as if you imply the dislikes are "nefarious and fraudulent" and Google removes it. Is that your intention?

    – Fermi paradox
    3 hours ago





    "they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity" - The way you phrased it, it sounds as if you imply the dislikes are "nefarious and fraudulent" and Google removes it. Is that your intention?

    – Fermi paradox
    3 hours ago











    1














    It's been previously documented that "glitches" can also alter the like/dislike ratio on a large scale, for example, a Justin Bieber video (including, bizarrely, adding dislikes to likes), so it's entirely possible:



    https://heavy.com/social/2013/05/youtube-glitch-removes-dislikes-adds-likes/



    Given YouTube control the stats behind the scenes, they can hypothetically do anything on likes/dislikes (similar to the 301 views cap). As for why it might be occurring, one can only speculate just short of an internal leak.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

























      1














      It's been previously documented that "glitches" can also alter the like/dislike ratio on a large scale, for example, a Justin Bieber video (including, bizarrely, adding dislikes to likes), so it's entirely possible:



      https://heavy.com/social/2013/05/youtube-glitch-removes-dislikes-adds-likes/



      Given YouTube control the stats behind the scenes, they can hypothetically do anything on likes/dislikes (similar to the 301 views cap). As for why it might be occurring, one can only speculate just short of an internal leak.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.























        1












        1








        1







        It's been previously documented that "glitches" can also alter the like/dislike ratio on a large scale, for example, a Justin Bieber video (including, bizarrely, adding dislikes to likes), so it's entirely possible:



        https://heavy.com/social/2013/05/youtube-glitch-removes-dislikes-adds-likes/



        Given YouTube control the stats behind the scenes, they can hypothetically do anything on likes/dislikes (similar to the 301 views cap). As for why it might be occurring, one can only speculate just short of an internal leak.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.










        It's been previously documented that "glitches" can also alter the like/dislike ratio on a large scale, for example, a Justin Bieber video (including, bizarrely, adding dislikes to likes), so it's entirely possible:



        https://heavy.com/social/2013/05/youtube-glitch-removes-dislikes-adds-likes/



        Given YouTube control the stats behind the scenes, they can hypothetically do anything on likes/dislikes (similar to the 301 views cap). As for why it might be occurring, one can only speculate just short of an internal leak.







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 5 hours ago









        SSight3SSight3

        1112




        1112




        New contributor




        SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.















            Popular posts from this blog

            Loup dans la culture

            How to solve the problem of ntp “Unable to contact time server” from KDE?

            Connection limited (no internet access)