This Alpine town?
https://wallpapershome.com/nature/alps-switzerland-europe-mountains-trees-sky-clouds-8k-16935.html
It would seem to be by this photographer, F. Mittermeier
where-on-earth locate-this
asked 9 hours ago
FattieFattie
4,44811963
add a comment |
https://wallpapershome.com/nature/alps-switzerland-europe-mountains-trees-sky-clouds-8k-16935.html
It would seem to be by this photographer, F. Mittermeier
where-on-earth locate-this
asked 9 hours ago
FattieFattie
4,44811963
add a comment |
https://wallpapershome.com/nature/alps-switzerland-europe-mountains-trees-sky-clouds-8k-16935.html
It would seem to be by this photographer, F. Mittermeier
where-on-earth locate-this
asked 9 hours ago
FattieFattie
4,44811963
https://wallpapershome.com/nature/alps-switzerland-europe-mountains-trees-sky-clouds-8k-16935.html
It would seem to be by this photographer, F. Mittermeier
where-on-earth locate-this
where-on-earth locate-this
asked 9 hours ago
FattieFattie
4,44811963
asked 9 hours ago
FattieFattie
4,44811963
asked 9 hours ago
FattieFattie
4,44811963
asked 9 hours ago
FattieFattie
4,44811963
asked 9 hours ago
FattieFattie
4,44811963
4,44811963
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It is not Switzerland, as the page you are linking to claims, but the picture is from Berchtesgaden in Germany. The largest peak in the background to the right is the Watzmann.
At least most of it. There has been done some really strange manipulations of the image and I am not 100% sure if it is not at least partially a collage put together from different pictures, perhaps also different locations. The sky looks unreal enough to perhaps be computer generated.
Looking at some of the details in the image, e.g. the top of the three church towers to the right have been removed:
answered 8 hours ago
Tor-Einar JarnbjoTor-Einar Jarnbjo
34k485124
Could you please cite the source of the second image?
– Nate Eldredge
8 hours ago
@NateEldredge No, sorry, I can't find it anymore.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
2
@Willeke I am honestly not sure where Nate and you are trying to get. If the problem ist that I have used a tiny, low-quality, water-marked crop of an image without quoting a source just to show how the church towers really look like, I have now removed the image.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
1
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berchtesgaden#/media/… for the missing three towers.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
3
@JörgWMittag Let's debunk this for a moment. CC BY-SA 2.0 license states: "[…] where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply […]". Further, "Fair Use" ("copying of copyrighted material for a limited and transformative purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize […] a copyrighted work") would qualify as an exception in this case, rendering application of the CC BY-SA license moot by its own definition. The OPs crop would be allowed under the exception, as it is an extract of the original image for the purpose of comment.
– Guido
5 hours ago
|
show 17 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133601%2fthis-alpine-town%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It is not Switzerland, as the page you are linking to claims, but the picture is from Berchtesgaden in Germany. The largest peak in the background to the right is the Watzmann.
At least most of it. There has been done some really strange manipulations of the image and I am not 100% sure if it is not at least partially a collage put together from different pictures, perhaps also different locations. The sky looks unreal enough to perhaps be computer generated.
Looking at some of the details in the image, e.g. the top of the three church towers to the right have been removed:
answered 8 hours ago
Tor-Einar JarnbjoTor-Einar Jarnbjo
34k485124
Could you please cite the source of the second image?
– Nate Eldredge
8 hours ago
@NateEldredge No, sorry, I can't find it anymore.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
2
@Willeke I am honestly not sure where Nate and you are trying to get. If the problem ist that I have used a tiny, low-quality, water-marked crop of an image without quoting a source just to show how the church towers really look like, I have now removed the image.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
1
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berchtesgaden#/media/… for the missing three towers.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
3
@JörgWMittag Let's debunk this for a moment. CC BY-SA 2.0 license states: "[…] where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply […]". Further, "Fair Use" ("copying of copyrighted material for a limited and transformative purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize […] a copyrighted work") would qualify as an exception in this case, rendering application of the CC BY-SA license moot by its own definition. The OPs crop would be allowed under the exception, as it is an extract of the original image for the purpose of comment.
– Guido
5 hours ago
|
show 17 more comments
It is not Switzerland, as the page you are linking to claims, but the picture is from Berchtesgaden in Germany. The largest peak in the background to the right is the Watzmann.
At least most of it. There has been done some really strange manipulations of the image and I am not 100% sure if it is not at least partially a collage put together from different pictures, perhaps also different locations. The sky looks unreal enough to perhaps be computer generated.
Looking at some of the details in the image, e.g. the top of the three church towers to the right have been removed:
answered 8 hours ago
Tor-Einar JarnbjoTor-Einar Jarnbjo
34k485124
Could you please cite the source of the second image?
– Nate Eldredge
8 hours ago
@NateEldredge No, sorry, I can't find it anymore.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
2
@Willeke I am honestly not sure where Nate and you are trying to get. If the problem ist that I have used a tiny, low-quality, water-marked crop of an image without quoting a source just to show how the church towers really look like, I have now removed the image.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
1
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berchtesgaden#/media/… for the missing three towers.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
3
@JörgWMittag Let's debunk this for a moment. CC BY-SA 2.0 license states: "[…] where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply […]". Further, "Fair Use" ("copying of copyrighted material for a limited and transformative purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize […] a copyrighted work") would qualify as an exception in this case, rendering application of the CC BY-SA license moot by its own definition. The OPs crop would be allowed under the exception, as it is an extract of the original image for the purpose of comment.
– Guido
5 hours ago
|
show 17 more comments
It is not Switzerland, as the page you are linking to claims, but the picture is from Berchtesgaden in Germany. The largest peak in the background to the right is the Watzmann.
At least most of it. There has been done some really strange manipulations of the image and I am not 100% sure if it is not at least partially a collage put together from different pictures, perhaps also different locations. The sky looks unreal enough to perhaps be computer generated.
Looking at some of the details in the image, e.g. the top of the three church towers to the right have been removed:
answered 8 hours ago
Tor-Einar JarnbjoTor-Einar Jarnbjo
34k485124
It is not Switzerland, as the page you are linking to claims, but the picture is from Berchtesgaden in Germany. The largest peak in the background to the right is the Watzmann.
At least most of it. There has been done some really strange manipulations of the image and I am not 100% sure if it is not at least partially a collage put together from different pictures, perhaps also different locations. The sky looks unreal enough to perhaps be computer generated.
Looking at some of the details in the image, e.g. the top of the three church towers to the right have been removed:
answered 8 hours ago
Tor-Einar JarnbjoTor-Einar Jarnbjo
34k485124
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
Tor-Einar JarnbjoTor-Einar Jarnbjo
34k485124
answered 8 hours ago
Tor-Einar JarnbjoTor-Einar Jarnbjo
34k485124
answered 8 hours ago
Tor-Einar JarnbjoTor-Einar Jarnbjo
34k485124
34k485124
Could you please cite the source of the second image?
– Nate Eldredge
8 hours ago
@NateEldredge No, sorry, I can't find it anymore.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
2
@Willeke I am honestly not sure where Nate and you are trying to get. If the problem ist that I have used a tiny, low-quality, water-marked crop of an image without quoting a source just to show how the church towers really look like, I have now removed the image.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
1
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berchtesgaden#/media/… for the missing three towers.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
3
@JörgWMittag Let's debunk this for a moment. CC BY-SA 2.0 license states: "[…] where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply […]". Further, "Fair Use" ("copying of copyrighted material for a limited and transformative purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize […] a copyrighted work") would qualify as an exception in this case, rendering application of the CC BY-SA license moot by its own definition. The OPs crop would be allowed under the exception, as it is an extract of the original image for the purpose of comment.
– Guido
5 hours ago
|
show 17 more comments
Could you please cite the source of the second image?
– Nate Eldredge
8 hours ago
@NateEldredge No, sorry, I can't find it anymore.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
2
@Willeke I am honestly not sure where Nate and you are trying to get. If the problem ist that I have used a tiny, low-quality, water-marked crop of an image without quoting a source just to show how the church towers really look like, I have now removed the image.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
1
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berchtesgaden#/media/… for the missing three towers.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
3
@JörgWMittag Let's debunk this for a moment. CC BY-SA 2.0 license states: "[…] where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply […]". Further, "Fair Use" ("copying of copyrighted material for a limited and transformative purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize […] a copyrighted work") would qualify as an exception in this case, rendering application of the CC BY-SA license moot by its own definition. The OPs crop would be allowed under the exception, as it is an extract of the original image for the purpose of comment.
– Guido
5 hours ago
Could you please cite the source of the second image?
– Nate Eldredge
8 hours ago
Could you please cite the source of the second image?
– Nate Eldredge
8 hours ago
@NateEldredge No, sorry, I can't find it anymore.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
@NateEldredge No, sorry, I can't find it anymore.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
2
2
@Willeke I am honestly not sure where Nate and you are trying to get. If the problem ist that I have used a tiny, low-quality, water-marked crop of an image without quoting a source just to show how the church towers really look like, I have now removed the image.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
@Willeke I am honestly not sure where Nate and you are trying to get. If the problem ist that I have used a tiny, low-quality, water-marked crop of an image without quoting a source just to show how the church towers really look like, I have now removed the image.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
8 hours ago
1
1
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berchtesgaden#/media/… for the missing three towers.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berchtesgaden#/media/… for the missing three towers.
– alephzero
6 hours ago
3
3
@JörgWMittag Let's debunk this for a moment. CC BY-SA 2.0 license states: "[…] where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply […]". Further, "Fair Use" ("copying of copyrighted material for a limited and transformative purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize […] a copyrighted work") would qualify as an exception in this case, rendering application of the CC BY-SA license moot by its own definition. The OPs crop would be allowed under the exception, as it is an extract of the original image for the purpose of comment.
– Guido
5 hours ago
@JörgWMittag Let's debunk this for a moment. CC BY-SA 2.0 license states: "[…] where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply […]". Further, "Fair Use" ("copying of copyrighted material for a limited and transformative purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize […] a copyrighted work") would qualify as an exception in this case, rendering application of the CC BY-SA license moot by its own definition. The OPs crop would be allowed under the exception, as it is an extract of the original image for the purpose of comment.
– Guido
5 hours ago
|
show 17 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133601%2fthis-alpine-town%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
